Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural Mozambique

In the context of the prevalent neo-liberal discourse on rural development through improved markets, involvement of companies and a strong reliance on foreign investors this article examines the vulnerable position of smallholder irrigators and their water rights. Through the parallel analysis of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gert Jan Veldwisch, Wouter Beekman, Alex Bolding
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Water Alternatives Association 2013-02-01
Series:Water Alternatives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue1/202-a6-1-7/file
id doaj-da2e39b1229349c1bfb0cfa6a23b91eb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-da2e39b1229349c1bfb0cfa6a23b91eb2020-11-24T21:33:05ZengWater Alternatives AssociationWater Alternatives1965-01751965-01752013-02-0161125141Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural MozambiqueGert Jan Veldwisch0Wouter Beekman1Alex Bolding2Irrigation and Water Engineering Group of Wageningen University, Wageningen, the NetherlandsResilience BV, Wageningen, the NetherlandsIrrigation and Water Engineering Group of Wageningen University, Wageningen, the NetherlandsIn the context of the prevalent neo-liberal discourse on rural development through improved markets, involvement of companies and a strong reliance on foreign investors this article examines the vulnerable position of smallholder irrigators and their water rights. Through the parallel analysis of three contrasting cases of smallholder irrigation in Mozambique and a comparison with formal Mozambican law, it is shown that a big gap exists between formal water rights and water rights in practice. For each case, it is shown how land and water rights are connected and how a successful defence of land rights provides a good basis for a defence of smallholder water rights. Furthermore, as productivity and efficiency arguments are prominent and influential, those smallholders who are able to turn their use into the production of economic value manage best to materialise their claims on both land and water. The paper concludes with recommendations to strengthen the position of smallholders in response to increasing threats of land and water grabbing.http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue1/202-a6-1-7/fileIrrigationsmallholder productionwater rightsland and water grabbingMozambique
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gert Jan Veldwisch
Wouter Beekman
Alex Bolding
spellingShingle Gert Jan Veldwisch
Wouter Beekman
Alex Bolding
Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural Mozambique
Water Alternatives
Irrigation
smallholder production
water rights
land and water grabbing
Mozambique
author_facet Gert Jan Veldwisch
Wouter Beekman
Alex Bolding
author_sort Gert Jan Veldwisch
title Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural Mozambique
title_short Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural Mozambique
title_full Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural Mozambique
title_fullStr Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural Mozambique
title_full_unstemmed Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural Mozambique
title_sort smallholder irrigators, water rights and investments in agriculture: three cases from rural mozambique
publisher Water Alternatives Association
series Water Alternatives
issn 1965-0175
1965-0175
publishDate 2013-02-01
description In the context of the prevalent neo-liberal discourse on rural development through improved markets, involvement of companies and a strong reliance on foreign investors this article examines the vulnerable position of smallholder irrigators and their water rights. Through the parallel analysis of three contrasting cases of smallholder irrigation in Mozambique and a comparison with formal Mozambican law, it is shown that a big gap exists between formal water rights and water rights in practice. For each case, it is shown how land and water rights are connected and how a successful defence of land rights provides a good basis for a defence of smallholder water rights. Furthermore, as productivity and efficiency arguments are prominent and influential, those smallholders who are able to turn their use into the production of economic value manage best to materialise their claims on both land and water. The paper concludes with recommendations to strengthen the position of smallholders in response to increasing threats of land and water grabbing.
topic Irrigation
smallholder production
water rights
land and water grabbing
Mozambique
url http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue1/202-a6-1-7/file
work_keys_str_mv AT gertjanveldwisch smallholderirrigatorswaterrightsandinvestmentsinagriculturethreecasesfromruralmozambique
AT wouterbeekman smallholderirrigatorswaterrightsandinvestmentsinagriculturethreecasesfromruralmozambique
AT alexbolding smallholderirrigatorswaterrightsandinvestmentsinagriculturethreecasesfromruralmozambique
_version_ 1725954922905600000