Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural Mozambique
In the context of the prevalent neo-liberal discourse on rural development through improved markets, involvement of companies and a strong reliance on foreign investors this article examines the vulnerable position of smallholder irrigators and their water rights. Through the parallel analysis of th...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Water Alternatives Association
2013-02-01
|
Series: | Water Alternatives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue1/202-a6-1-7/file |
id |
doaj-da2e39b1229349c1bfb0cfa6a23b91eb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-da2e39b1229349c1bfb0cfa6a23b91eb2020-11-24T21:33:05ZengWater Alternatives AssociationWater Alternatives1965-01751965-01752013-02-0161125141Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural MozambiqueGert Jan Veldwisch0Wouter Beekman1Alex Bolding2Irrigation and Water Engineering Group of Wageningen University, Wageningen, the NetherlandsResilience BV, Wageningen, the NetherlandsIrrigation and Water Engineering Group of Wageningen University, Wageningen, the NetherlandsIn the context of the prevalent neo-liberal discourse on rural development through improved markets, involvement of companies and a strong reliance on foreign investors this article examines the vulnerable position of smallholder irrigators and their water rights. Through the parallel analysis of three contrasting cases of smallholder irrigation in Mozambique and a comparison with formal Mozambican law, it is shown that a big gap exists between formal water rights and water rights in practice. For each case, it is shown how land and water rights are connected and how a successful defence of land rights provides a good basis for a defence of smallholder water rights. Furthermore, as productivity and efficiency arguments are prominent and influential, those smallholders who are able to turn their use into the production of economic value manage best to materialise their claims on both land and water. The paper concludes with recommendations to strengthen the position of smallholders in response to increasing threats of land and water grabbing.http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue1/202-a6-1-7/fileIrrigationsmallholder productionwater rightsland and water grabbingMozambique |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gert Jan Veldwisch Wouter Beekman Alex Bolding |
spellingShingle |
Gert Jan Veldwisch Wouter Beekman Alex Bolding Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural Mozambique Water Alternatives Irrigation smallholder production water rights land and water grabbing Mozambique |
author_facet |
Gert Jan Veldwisch Wouter Beekman Alex Bolding |
author_sort |
Gert Jan Veldwisch |
title |
Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural Mozambique |
title_short |
Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural Mozambique |
title_full |
Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural Mozambique |
title_fullStr |
Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural Mozambique |
title_full_unstemmed |
Smallholder Irrigators, Water Rights and Investments in Agriculture: Three Cases from Rural Mozambique |
title_sort |
smallholder irrigators, water rights and investments in agriculture: three cases from rural mozambique |
publisher |
Water Alternatives Association |
series |
Water Alternatives |
issn |
1965-0175 1965-0175 |
publishDate |
2013-02-01 |
description |
In the context of the prevalent neo-liberal discourse on rural development through improved markets, involvement of companies and a strong reliance on foreign investors this article examines the vulnerable position of smallholder irrigators and their water rights. Through the parallel analysis of three contrasting cases of smallholder irrigation in Mozambique and a comparison with formal Mozambican law, it is shown that a big gap exists between formal water rights and water rights in practice. For each case, it is shown how land and water rights are connected and how a successful defence of land rights provides a good basis for a defence of smallholder water rights. Furthermore, as productivity and efficiency arguments are prominent and influential, those smallholders who are able to turn their use into the production of economic value manage best to materialise their claims on both land and water. The paper concludes with recommendations to strengthen the position of smallholders in response to increasing threats of land and water grabbing. |
topic |
Irrigation smallholder production water rights land and water grabbing Mozambique |
url |
http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue1/202-a6-1-7/file |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gertjanveldwisch smallholderirrigatorswaterrightsandinvestmentsinagriculturethreecasesfromruralmozambique AT wouterbeekman smallholderirrigatorswaterrightsandinvestmentsinagriculturethreecasesfromruralmozambique AT alexbolding smallholderirrigatorswaterrightsandinvestmentsinagriculturethreecasesfromruralmozambique |
_version_ |
1725954922905600000 |