Konflik Penambangan Batugamping Kecamatan Ponjong dalam Tinjauan Arena Bourdieu

Limestone mining is a problem in the karst area because it causes environmental degradation, social change from the agrarian to industrial, and conflicts among stakeholders. Therefore, the limestone mining is not only identified as the environmental damage problems but also environmental management...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hilary Reinhart
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Diponegoro University 2017-03-01
Series:Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jwl/article/view/880
id doaj-d9eb8d2a11d745bf806954e2e692fcf7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d9eb8d2a11d745bf806954e2e692fcf72020-11-24T23:05:09ZengDiponegoro UniversityJurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan2338-16042407-87512017-03-0151455810.14710/jwl.5.1.45-58723Konflik Penambangan Batugamping Kecamatan Ponjong dalam Tinjauan Arena BourdieuHilary Reinhart0Magister Pengelolaan Lingkungan, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Bulaksumur, YogyakartaLimestone mining is a problem in the karst area because it causes environmental degradation, social change from the agrarian to industrial, and conflicts among stakeholders. Therefore, the limestone mining is not only identified as the environmental damage problems but also environmental management problems. The article aimed to explain an overview of the mining conflicts in the karst region. On the other hand, this study also provided a new approach in understanding the conflicts of mining. The study was conducted using qualitative descriptive analysis. Analyses were performed using stakeholder mapping and potential conflicts between stakeholders. The mapping results were contextualized using field and capital approach of Pierre Bourdieu theory. The approach used to understand the direction of conflicts and capital contestation of each author. The capital analysis showed that the government, namely the Energy and Mineral Resources in various levels of bureaucracy has the dominant capital in the arena of limestone mining in Ponjong District because it has a complete capital and outperforms of the other actors. It concludes that the differences types of capital affect the actors to take the position in an arena and each actor who has a robust capital sought to accumulate the capital to attain the main capital.http://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jwl/article/view/880fieldcapitalconflictstakeholdersBourdieu Theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hilary Reinhart
spellingShingle Hilary Reinhart
Konflik Penambangan Batugamping Kecamatan Ponjong dalam Tinjauan Arena Bourdieu
Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan
field
capital
conflict
stakeholders
Bourdieu Theory
author_facet Hilary Reinhart
author_sort Hilary Reinhart
title Konflik Penambangan Batugamping Kecamatan Ponjong dalam Tinjauan Arena Bourdieu
title_short Konflik Penambangan Batugamping Kecamatan Ponjong dalam Tinjauan Arena Bourdieu
title_full Konflik Penambangan Batugamping Kecamatan Ponjong dalam Tinjauan Arena Bourdieu
title_fullStr Konflik Penambangan Batugamping Kecamatan Ponjong dalam Tinjauan Arena Bourdieu
title_full_unstemmed Konflik Penambangan Batugamping Kecamatan Ponjong dalam Tinjauan Arena Bourdieu
title_sort konflik penambangan batugamping kecamatan ponjong dalam tinjauan arena bourdieu
publisher Diponegoro University
series Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan
issn 2338-1604
2407-8751
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Limestone mining is a problem in the karst area because it causes environmental degradation, social change from the agrarian to industrial, and conflicts among stakeholders. Therefore, the limestone mining is not only identified as the environmental damage problems but also environmental management problems. The article aimed to explain an overview of the mining conflicts in the karst region. On the other hand, this study also provided a new approach in understanding the conflicts of mining. The study was conducted using qualitative descriptive analysis. Analyses were performed using stakeholder mapping and potential conflicts between stakeholders. The mapping results were contextualized using field and capital approach of Pierre Bourdieu theory. The approach used to understand the direction of conflicts and capital contestation of each author. The capital analysis showed that the government, namely the Energy and Mineral Resources in various levels of bureaucracy has the dominant capital in the arena of limestone mining in Ponjong District because it has a complete capital and outperforms of the other actors. It concludes that the differences types of capital affect the actors to take the position in an arena and each actor who has a robust capital sought to accumulate the capital to attain the main capital.
topic field
capital
conflict
stakeholders
Bourdieu Theory
url http://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jwl/article/view/880
work_keys_str_mv AT hilaryreinhart konflikpenambanganbatugampingkecamatanponjongdalamtinjauanarenabourdieu
_version_ 1725627236011212800