Variations and voids: the regulation of human cloning around the world

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>No two countries have adopted identical regulatory measures on cloning. Understanding the complexity of these regulatory variations is essential. It highlights the challenges associated with the regulation of a controversial and rapi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caulfield Timothy, Pattinson Shaun D
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2004-12-01
Series:BMC Medical Ethics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/5/9
id doaj-d9ea7fe0ce0442aca7642e5966a8f7d3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d9ea7fe0ce0442aca7642e5966a8f7d32020-11-25T02:58:05ZengBMCBMC Medical Ethics1472-69392004-12-0151910.1186/1472-6939-5-9Variations and voids: the regulation of human cloning around the worldCaulfield TimothyPattinson Shaun D<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>No two countries have adopted identical regulatory measures on cloning. Understanding the complexity of these regulatory variations is essential. It highlights the challenges associated with the regulation of a controversial and rapidly evolving area of science and sheds light on a regulatory framework that can accommodate this reality.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using the most reliable information available, we have performed a survey of the regulatory position of thirty countries around the world regarding the creation and use of cloned embryos (see Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). We have relied on original and translated legislation, as well as published sources and personal communications. We have examined the regulation of both reproductive cloning (RC) and non-reproductive cloning (NRC).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>While most of the countries studied have enacted national legislation, the absence of legislation in seven of these countries should not be equated with the absence of regulation. Senator Morin was not correct in stating that the majority of recent legislation bans both RC and NRC. Recent regulatory moves are united only with regard to the banning of RC. While NRC is not permitted in seventeen of the countries examined, it could be permitted in up to thirteen countries.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>There is little consensus on the various approaches to cloning laws and policies, and the regulatory position in many countries remains uncertain.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/5/9
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Caulfield Timothy
Pattinson Shaun D
spellingShingle Caulfield Timothy
Pattinson Shaun D
Variations and voids: the regulation of human cloning around the world
BMC Medical Ethics
author_facet Caulfield Timothy
Pattinson Shaun D
author_sort Caulfield Timothy
title Variations and voids: the regulation of human cloning around the world
title_short Variations and voids: the regulation of human cloning around the world
title_full Variations and voids: the regulation of human cloning around the world
title_fullStr Variations and voids: the regulation of human cloning around the world
title_full_unstemmed Variations and voids: the regulation of human cloning around the world
title_sort variations and voids: the regulation of human cloning around the world
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Ethics
issn 1472-6939
publishDate 2004-12-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>No two countries have adopted identical regulatory measures on cloning. Understanding the complexity of these regulatory variations is essential. It highlights the challenges associated with the regulation of a controversial and rapidly evolving area of science and sheds light on a regulatory framework that can accommodate this reality.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using the most reliable information available, we have performed a survey of the regulatory position of thirty countries around the world regarding the creation and use of cloned embryos (see Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). We have relied on original and translated legislation, as well as published sources and personal communications. We have examined the regulation of both reproductive cloning (RC) and non-reproductive cloning (NRC).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>While most of the countries studied have enacted national legislation, the absence of legislation in seven of these countries should not be equated with the absence of regulation. Senator Morin was not correct in stating that the majority of recent legislation bans both RC and NRC. Recent regulatory moves are united only with regard to the banning of RC. While NRC is not permitted in seventeen of the countries examined, it could be permitted in up to thirteen countries.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>There is little consensus on the various approaches to cloning laws and policies, and the regulatory position in many countries remains uncertain.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/5/9
work_keys_str_mv AT caulfieldtimothy variationsandvoidstheregulationofhumancloningaroundtheworld
AT pattinsonshaund variationsandvoidstheregulationofhumancloningaroundtheworld
_version_ 1724708647425015808