The Evolution and Role of the Bursal Acromial Reconstruction

Background: Massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs) remain a challenging clinical problem with numerous described treatment options. Bursal acromial reconstruction (BAR) represents a promising and evolving technique for a subset of patients with irreparable RCTs. Indications: BAR is indicated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel M. Curtis MD, W. Michael Pullen MD, Kevin Helenius PA, Michael T. Freehill MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-03-01
Series:Video Journal of Sports Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254211001367
id doaj-d9d45d03c07d49a5a4d11608d61750c4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d9d45d03c07d49a5a4d11608d61750c42021-08-09T07:03:57ZengSAGE PublishingVideo Journal of Sports Medicine2635-02542021-03-01110.1177/26350254211001367The Evolution and Role of the Bursal Acromial ReconstructionDaniel M. Curtis MD0W. Michael Pullen MD1Kevin Helenius PA2Michael T. Freehill MD3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, USABackground: Massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs) remain a challenging clinical problem with numerous described treatment options. Bursal acromial reconstruction (BAR) represents a promising and evolving technique for a subset of patients with irreparable RCTs. Indications: BAR is indicated for patients with massive, irreparable RCTs with a primary complaint of pain, well-compensated shoulder function, and minimal radiographic degenerative changes of the glenohumeral joint as an alternative to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty or superior capsular reconstruction. Technique Description: Positioning per surgeon preference and diagnostic arthroscopy is performed. Subacromial decompression with a minimal and gentle acromioplasty is performed, followed by assessment of RCT repairability. If the tear is deemed irreparable, acromial measurements in the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior dimensions are obtained. Two pieces of acellular dermal allograft are cut to the acromial dimensions and affixed together using fibrin glue. The reactive side (facing the acromion), medial, and anterior sides of the graft are labeled. Two suture tapes are passed through the corners of the graft and self-locked and run diagonally in a cruciate configuration using an antegrade suture passer. Medial and lateral #2 fiberwire sutures are placed in a luggage-tag configuration. Neviaser (posterior), middle, and anterior acromioclavicular joint portals are created for medial sided suture passage. Medial graft sutures are shuttled through the respective medial portals and the graft is pulled into the subacromial space. The lateral sutures are then removed from percutaneous posterolateral, middle lateral, and anterolateral portals along the acromial edge. Medial sutures are retrieved using a suture grasper subcutaneously on top of the acromion through the percutaneous lateral portals. The sutures are tied through the lateral portals, starting with the medial-lateral sutures, and the knots are buried. Postoperatively, patients are progressed through passive, active-assisted, and active range of motion between weeks 2 and 6 and strengthening is progressed at 6 weeks. Results: Clinical results are lacking in the literature, but anecdotal results in our institution have demonstrated promising early outcomes. Discussion/Conclusion: BAR represents a promising alternative in the array of surgical options for treatment of irreparable RCTs.https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254211001367
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel M. Curtis MD
W. Michael Pullen MD
Kevin Helenius PA
Michael T. Freehill MD
spellingShingle Daniel M. Curtis MD
W. Michael Pullen MD
Kevin Helenius PA
Michael T. Freehill MD
The Evolution and Role of the Bursal Acromial Reconstruction
Video Journal of Sports Medicine
author_facet Daniel M. Curtis MD
W. Michael Pullen MD
Kevin Helenius PA
Michael T. Freehill MD
author_sort Daniel M. Curtis MD
title The Evolution and Role of the Bursal Acromial Reconstruction
title_short The Evolution and Role of the Bursal Acromial Reconstruction
title_full The Evolution and Role of the Bursal Acromial Reconstruction
title_fullStr The Evolution and Role of the Bursal Acromial Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed The Evolution and Role of the Bursal Acromial Reconstruction
title_sort evolution and role of the bursal acromial reconstruction
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Video Journal of Sports Medicine
issn 2635-0254
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Background: Massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs) remain a challenging clinical problem with numerous described treatment options. Bursal acromial reconstruction (BAR) represents a promising and evolving technique for a subset of patients with irreparable RCTs. Indications: BAR is indicated for patients with massive, irreparable RCTs with a primary complaint of pain, well-compensated shoulder function, and minimal radiographic degenerative changes of the glenohumeral joint as an alternative to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty or superior capsular reconstruction. Technique Description: Positioning per surgeon preference and diagnostic arthroscopy is performed. Subacromial decompression with a minimal and gentle acromioplasty is performed, followed by assessment of RCT repairability. If the tear is deemed irreparable, acromial measurements in the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior dimensions are obtained. Two pieces of acellular dermal allograft are cut to the acromial dimensions and affixed together using fibrin glue. The reactive side (facing the acromion), medial, and anterior sides of the graft are labeled. Two suture tapes are passed through the corners of the graft and self-locked and run diagonally in a cruciate configuration using an antegrade suture passer. Medial and lateral #2 fiberwire sutures are placed in a luggage-tag configuration. Neviaser (posterior), middle, and anterior acromioclavicular joint portals are created for medial sided suture passage. Medial graft sutures are shuttled through the respective medial portals and the graft is pulled into the subacromial space. The lateral sutures are then removed from percutaneous posterolateral, middle lateral, and anterolateral portals along the acromial edge. Medial sutures are retrieved using a suture grasper subcutaneously on top of the acromion through the percutaneous lateral portals. The sutures are tied through the lateral portals, starting with the medial-lateral sutures, and the knots are buried. Postoperatively, patients are progressed through passive, active-assisted, and active range of motion between weeks 2 and 6 and strengthening is progressed at 6 weeks. Results: Clinical results are lacking in the literature, but anecdotal results in our institution have demonstrated promising early outcomes. Discussion/Conclusion: BAR represents a promising alternative in the array of surgical options for treatment of irreparable RCTs.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254211001367
work_keys_str_mv AT danielmcurtismd theevolutionandroleofthebursalacromialreconstruction
AT wmichaelpullenmd theevolutionandroleofthebursalacromialreconstruction
AT kevinheleniuspa theevolutionandroleofthebursalacromialreconstruction
AT michaeltfreehillmd theevolutionandroleofthebursalacromialreconstruction
AT danielmcurtismd evolutionandroleofthebursalacromialreconstruction
AT wmichaelpullenmd evolutionandroleofthebursalacromialreconstruction
AT kevinheleniuspa evolutionandroleofthebursalacromialreconstruction
AT michaeltfreehillmd evolutionandroleofthebursalacromialreconstruction
_version_ 1721215145642819584