Shaftesbury as Popperian: critical rationalism before its time? Part I

Shaftesbury has assigned humor an unparalleled role within philosophy, which maybe encapsulated in the following tenets: (1) ridicule is the test of truth; (2) humor andgood humor have a habilitating function with regard to truth; (3) the most effectivecriticism is humorous; and (4) humor is the mar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lydia Amir
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego 2016-01-01
Series:Analiza i Egzystencja
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wnus.edu.pl/aie/pl/issue/88/article/2713/
id doaj-d9ce1836643e4d708d0f84a1517c5de2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d9ce1836643e4d708d0f84a1517c5de22020-11-25T01:40:08ZdeuWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu SzczecińskiegoAnaliza i Egzystencja 1734-99232016-01-013510.18276/aie.2016.35-01Shaftesbury as Popperian: critical rationalism before its time? Part ILydia Amir0College of Management Academic Studies, Rishon LeZion, IsraelShaftesbury has assigned humor an unparalleled role within philosophy, which maybe encapsulated in the following tenets: (1) ridicule is the test of truth; (2) humor andgood humor have a habilitating function with regard to truth; (3) the most effectivecriticism is humorous; and (4) humor is the mark of rationality. In the present article,I introduce Shaftesbury’s views on ridicule, good humor and humor in order to assessboth the originality and viability of Shaftesbury’s contribution. I argue, first, thatShaftesbury’s views on ridicule as a test of truth and on good-humor as habilitatingtruth are thoroughly original, but cannot be implemented without adhering to hismetaphysics and epistemology. Second, Shaftesbury’s views on humor are only partiallyoriginal, though these can be implemented independently of metaphysical andepistemological assumptions for the greatest benefit of philosophers in general andcritical rationalists in particular. I conclude that not only does Shaftesbury anticipatethe view that critical thinking is the core of rationality, the main principle of the viewknown as critical rationalism associated with the renown 20th century philosopherof science and social philosopher, Karl Popper, but he also offers a viable meansto enhance criticism as rationality by taking into consideration the psychologicalresistance to criticism that Popper acknowledges but refuses to address.https://wnus.edu.pl/aie/pl/issue/88/article/2713/humor, critical rationalism, Shaftesbury
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lydia Amir
spellingShingle Lydia Amir
Shaftesbury as Popperian: critical rationalism before its time? Part I
Analiza i Egzystencja
humor, critical rationalism, Shaftesbury
author_facet Lydia Amir
author_sort Lydia Amir
title Shaftesbury as Popperian: critical rationalism before its time? Part I
title_short Shaftesbury as Popperian: critical rationalism before its time? Part I
title_full Shaftesbury as Popperian: critical rationalism before its time? Part I
title_fullStr Shaftesbury as Popperian: critical rationalism before its time? Part I
title_full_unstemmed Shaftesbury as Popperian: critical rationalism before its time? Part I
title_sort shaftesbury as popperian: critical rationalism before its time? part i
publisher Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
series Analiza i Egzystencja
issn 1734-9923
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Shaftesbury has assigned humor an unparalleled role within philosophy, which maybe encapsulated in the following tenets: (1) ridicule is the test of truth; (2) humor andgood humor have a habilitating function with regard to truth; (3) the most effectivecriticism is humorous; and (4) humor is the mark of rationality. In the present article,I introduce Shaftesbury’s views on ridicule, good humor and humor in order to assessboth the originality and viability of Shaftesbury’s contribution. I argue, first, thatShaftesbury’s views on ridicule as a test of truth and on good-humor as habilitatingtruth are thoroughly original, but cannot be implemented without adhering to hismetaphysics and epistemology. Second, Shaftesbury’s views on humor are only partiallyoriginal, though these can be implemented independently of metaphysical andepistemological assumptions for the greatest benefit of philosophers in general andcritical rationalists in particular. I conclude that not only does Shaftesbury anticipatethe view that critical thinking is the core of rationality, the main principle of the viewknown as critical rationalism associated with the renown 20th century philosopherof science and social philosopher, Karl Popper, but he also offers a viable meansto enhance criticism as rationality by taking into consideration the psychologicalresistance to criticism that Popper acknowledges but refuses to address.
topic humor, critical rationalism, Shaftesbury
url https://wnus.edu.pl/aie/pl/issue/88/article/2713/
work_keys_str_mv AT lydiaamir shaftesburyaspopperiancriticalrationalismbeforeitstimeparti
_version_ 1725046885969821696