Audit of head injury management in Accident and Emergency at two hospitals: implications for NICE CT guidelines

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) has produced guidelines on the early management of head injury. This study audits the process of the management of patients with head injury presenting at Accident and Emergency (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tennant Alan, Kent Ruth M, Miller Lucy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2004-05-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/4/7
id doaj-d9b853f577214206bf06cb35e3ec2fbf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d9b853f577214206bf06cb35e3ec2fbf2020-11-24T21:40:07ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632004-05-0141710.1186/1472-6963-4-7Audit of head injury management in Accident and Emergency at two hospitals: implications for NICE CT guidelinesTennant AlanKent Ruth MMiller Lucy<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) has produced guidelines on the early management of head injury. This study audits the process of the management of patients with head injury presenting at Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments and examines the impact upon resources of introducing NICE guidelines for eligibility of a CT scan.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A retrospective audit of consecutive patients of any age, presenting at A&E with a complaint of head injury during one month in two northern District General Hospitals forming part of a single NHS Trust.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>419 patients presented with a median age of 15.5 years, and 61% were male. 58% had a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) recorded and 33 (8%) were admitted. Only four of the ten indicators for a CT scan were routinely assessed, but data were complete for only one (age), and largely absent for another (vomiting). Using just three (incomplete) indicators showed a likely 4 fold increase in the need for a CT scan.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The majority of patients who present with a head injury to Accident and Emergency departments are discharged home. Current assessment processes and associated data collection routines do not provide the information necessary to implement NICE guidelines for CT brain scans. The development of such clinical audit systems in a busy A&E department is likely to require considerable investment in technology and/or staff. The resource implications for radiology are likely to be substantial.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/4/7
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tennant Alan
Kent Ruth M
Miller Lucy
spellingShingle Tennant Alan
Kent Ruth M
Miller Lucy
Audit of head injury management in Accident and Emergency at two hospitals: implications for NICE CT guidelines
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet Tennant Alan
Kent Ruth M
Miller Lucy
author_sort Tennant Alan
title Audit of head injury management in Accident and Emergency at two hospitals: implications for NICE CT guidelines
title_short Audit of head injury management in Accident and Emergency at two hospitals: implications for NICE CT guidelines
title_full Audit of head injury management in Accident and Emergency at two hospitals: implications for NICE CT guidelines
title_fullStr Audit of head injury management in Accident and Emergency at two hospitals: implications for NICE CT guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Audit of head injury management in Accident and Emergency at two hospitals: implications for NICE CT guidelines
title_sort audit of head injury management in accident and emergency at two hospitals: implications for nice ct guidelines
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2004-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) has produced guidelines on the early management of head injury. This study audits the process of the management of patients with head injury presenting at Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments and examines the impact upon resources of introducing NICE guidelines for eligibility of a CT scan.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A retrospective audit of consecutive patients of any age, presenting at A&E with a complaint of head injury during one month in two northern District General Hospitals forming part of a single NHS Trust.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>419 patients presented with a median age of 15.5 years, and 61% were male. 58% had a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) recorded and 33 (8%) were admitted. Only four of the ten indicators for a CT scan were routinely assessed, but data were complete for only one (age), and largely absent for another (vomiting). Using just three (incomplete) indicators showed a likely 4 fold increase in the need for a CT scan.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The majority of patients who present with a head injury to Accident and Emergency departments are discharged home. Current assessment processes and associated data collection routines do not provide the information necessary to implement NICE guidelines for CT brain scans. The development of such clinical audit systems in a busy A&E department is likely to require considerable investment in technology and/or staff. The resource implications for radiology are likely to be substantial.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/4/7
work_keys_str_mv AT tennantalan auditofheadinjurymanagementinaccidentandemergencyattwohospitalsimplicationsfornicectguidelines
AT kentruthm auditofheadinjurymanagementinaccidentandemergencyattwohospitalsimplicationsfornicectguidelines
AT millerlucy auditofheadinjurymanagementinaccidentandemergencyattwohospitalsimplicationsfornicectguidelines
_version_ 1725928116918943744