Cost-minimization analysis in a blind randomized trial on small-incision versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a societal perspective: sick leave outweighs efforts in hospital savings
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>After its introduction, laparoscopic cholecystectomy rapidly expanded around the world and was accepted the procedure of choice by consensus. However, analysis of evidence shows no difference regarding primary outcome measures betwee...
Main Authors: | Gooszen Hein G, de Jonge Trudy, Keus Frederik, Buskens Erik, van Laarhoven Cornelis JHM |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2009-09-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Online Access: | http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/10/1/80 |
Similar Items
-
Assessing factors influencing return back to work after cholecystectomy: a qualitative research
by: Gooszen Hein G, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01) -
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs Conventional Cholecystectomy in Developing Country
by: P B Thapa, et al.
Published: (2010-09-01) -
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Duplication
by: Esin Kabul Gürbulak, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Evidence at a glance: error matrix approach for overviewing available evidence
by: Gluud Christian, et al.
Published: (2010-10-01) -
Predictors of adverse postoperative course of cholecystectomy in mini-incision access and laparoscopic cholecystectomy
by: V. N. Klimenko, et al.
Published: (2014-04-01)