Efficacy of volumetric analysis of aorta as surveillance tool after EVAR

Summary: Objective: Compared to the diameter measurement, volume measurement of the aneurysm can be an alternative option for accurate evaluation. This study was undertaken to analyze the relationship between the diameter and the volume measurement of the aorta after EVAR. Methods: From January 201...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheng Quan, Youn Kyung Oh, Sun Cheol Park, Yong Sung Won, Sang Seob Yun, Young Ju Suh, Jang Yong Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-07-01
Series:Asian Journal of Surgery
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958418306456
id doaj-d9b00e2b6faa400e80b0ace25a0cab13
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d9b00e2b6faa400e80b0ace25a0cab132020-11-25T01:09:10ZengElsevierAsian Journal of Surgery1015-95842019-07-01427746754Efficacy of volumetric analysis of aorta as surveillance tool after EVARCheng Quan0Youn Kyung Oh1Sun Cheol Park2Yong Sung Won3Sang Seob Yun4Young Ju Suh5Jang Yong Kim6Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, South KoreaDepartment of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, South KoreaDivision of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, South KoreaDivision of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, South KoreaDivision of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, South KoreaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, South KoreaDivision of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, South Korea; Corresponding author. Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpodaero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea. Fax: +82 2 595 2822.Summary: Objective: Compared to the diameter measurement, volume measurement of the aneurysm can be an alternative option for accurate evaluation. This study was undertaken to analyze the relationship between the diameter and the volume measurement of the aorta after EVAR. Methods: From January 2012 to December 2016, 82 patients underwent EVAR in our institution. The infrarenal aorta after EVAR was evaluated with regard to maximal aortic diameter (DMAX) and aortic volume. The relationship between the DMAX and the aortic volume measurement after EVAR were analyzed. Results: The rate of enlargement of aortic volume with endoleak over time was 0.02 cm3/month. The rate of enlargement of DMAX with endoleak over time was 0.007 mm/month. The mean rate of enlargement of aortic volume was significantly different from the mean enlargement rate of DMAX (p = 0.02). A ≥12% of increase rate of aortic volume was equivalent to an increase of ≥5 mm in the DMAX after EVAR.Significantly more endoleak occurred in the DMAX-enlargement group than no-enlargement group (100% vs. 26.76%, p < 0.001). Significantly more patients need secondary intervention and treatment of endoleak in the DMAX-enlargement group (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). Significantly more endoleak occurred in the aortic volume–enlargement group than no-enlargement group (90.91% vs. 16.67%, p < 0.001). Significantly more patients needed secondary intervention and treatment for endoleak in the aortic volume–enlargement group (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Volumetric analysis can predict successful EVAR more accurate than diameter measurement. A ≥12% increase in aortic volume was equivalent to a ≥5 mm increase in aortic diameter. Keywords: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), Sac enlargement, Diameter measurements, Volume measurements, Post-EVAR surveillancehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958418306456
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cheng Quan
Youn Kyung Oh
Sun Cheol Park
Yong Sung Won
Sang Seob Yun
Young Ju Suh
Jang Yong Kim
spellingShingle Cheng Quan
Youn Kyung Oh
Sun Cheol Park
Yong Sung Won
Sang Seob Yun
Young Ju Suh
Jang Yong Kim
Efficacy of volumetric analysis of aorta as surveillance tool after EVAR
Asian Journal of Surgery
author_facet Cheng Quan
Youn Kyung Oh
Sun Cheol Park
Yong Sung Won
Sang Seob Yun
Young Ju Suh
Jang Yong Kim
author_sort Cheng Quan
title Efficacy of volumetric analysis of aorta as surveillance tool after EVAR
title_short Efficacy of volumetric analysis of aorta as surveillance tool after EVAR
title_full Efficacy of volumetric analysis of aorta as surveillance tool after EVAR
title_fullStr Efficacy of volumetric analysis of aorta as surveillance tool after EVAR
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of volumetric analysis of aorta as surveillance tool after EVAR
title_sort efficacy of volumetric analysis of aorta as surveillance tool after evar
publisher Elsevier
series Asian Journal of Surgery
issn 1015-9584
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Summary: Objective: Compared to the diameter measurement, volume measurement of the aneurysm can be an alternative option for accurate evaluation. This study was undertaken to analyze the relationship between the diameter and the volume measurement of the aorta after EVAR. Methods: From January 2012 to December 2016, 82 patients underwent EVAR in our institution. The infrarenal aorta after EVAR was evaluated with regard to maximal aortic diameter (DMAX) and aortic volume. The relationship between the DMAX and the aortic volume measurement after EVAR were analyzed. Results: The rate of enlargement of aortic volume with endoleak over time was 0.02 cm3/month. The rate of enlargement of DMAX with endoleak over time was 0.007 mm/month. The mean rate of enlargement of aortic volume was significantly different from the mean enlargement rate of DMAX (p = 0.02). A ≥12% of increase rate of aortic volume was equivalent to an increase of ≥5 mm in the DMAX after EVAR.Significantly more endoleak occurred in the DMAX-enlargement group than no-enlargement group (100% vs. 26.76%, p < 0.001). Significantly more patients need secondary intervention and treatment of endoleak in the DMAX-enlargement group (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). Significantly more endoleak occurred in the aortic volume–enlargement group than no-enlargement group (90.91% vs. 16.67%, p < 0.001). Significantly more patients needed secondary intervention and treatment for endoleak in the aortic volume–enlargement group (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Volumetric analysis can predict successful EVAR more accurate than diameter measurement. A ≥12% increase in aortic volume was equivalent to a ≥5 mm increase in aortic diameter. Keywords: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), Sac enlargement, Diameter measurements, Volume measurements, Post-EVAR surveillance
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958418306456
work_keys_str_mv AT chengquan efficacyofvolumetricanalysisofaortaassurveillancetoolafterevar
AT younkyungoh efficacyofvolumetricanalysisofaortaassurveillancetoolafterevar
AT suncheolpark efficacyofvolumetricanalysisofaortaassurveillancetoolafterevar
AT yongsungwon efficacyofvolumetricanalysisofaortaassurveillancetoolafterevar
AT sangseobyun efficacyofvolumetricanalysisofaortaassurveillancetoolafterevar
AT youngjusuh efficacyofvolumetricanalysisofaortaassurveillancetoolafterevar
AT jangyongkim efficacyofvolumetricanalysisofaortaassurveillancetoolafterevar
_version_ 1725179670732734464