Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables
We report on a mixed-method, comparative study investigating whether there is a difference between privacy concerns expressed about pet wearables as opposed to human wearables – and more importantly, why. We extracted the privacy concerns found in product reviews (N=8,038) of pet wearables (activity...
Main Authors: | van der Linden Dirk, Edwards Matthew, Hadar Irit, Zamansky Anna |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2020-0009 |
Similar Items
-
FacePET: Enhancing Bystanders’ Facial Privacy with Smart Wearables/Internet of Things
by: Alfredo J. Perez, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Extended Abstracts of the Fourth Privacy Enhancing Technologies Convention (PET-CON 2009.1)
Published: (2012) -
Evaluating End Users’ Online Privacy Preferences and Identifying PET Design Requirements: A Literature Review
by: Kolivodiakos, Paraskevas
Published: (2018) -
Individual versus Organizational Computer Security and Privacy Concerns in Journalism
by: McGregor Susan E., et al.
Published: (2016-10-01) -
Security, Privacy, and Usability in Continuous Authentication: A Survey
by: Ahmed Fraz Baig, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)