Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables

We report on a mixed-method, comparative study investigating whether there is a difference between privacy concerns expressed about pet wearables as opposed to human wearables – and more importantly, why. We extracted the privacy concerns found in product reviews (N=8,038) of pet wearables (activity...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: van der Linden Dirk, Edwards Matthew, Hadar Irit, Zamansky Anna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2020-01-01
Series:Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2020-0009
id doaj-d9a93fc3f31e4cf4b74e134228ba8da4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d9a93fc3f31e4cf4b74e134228ba8da42021-09-05T14:01:10ZengSciendoProceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies2299-09842020-01-012020114316410.2478/popets-2020-0009popets-2020-0009Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearablesvan der Linden Dirk0Edwards Matthew1Hadar Irit2Zamansky Anna3Bristol Cyber Security Group, University of BristolBristol Cyber Security Group, University of BristolDepartment of Information Systems, University of HaifaDepartment of Information Systems, University of HaifaWe report on a mixed-method, comparative study investigating whether there is a difference between privacy concerns expressed about pet wearables as opposed to human wearables – and more importantly, why. We extracted the privacy concerns found in product reviews (N=8,038) of pet wearables (activity, location, and dual-function trackers), contrasting the (lack of) concerns and misuse to a curated set of reviews for similar human-oriented wearables (N=20,431). Our findings indicate that, while overall very few privacy concerns are expressed in product reviews, for pet wearables they are expressed even less, even though consumers use these devices in a manner which impacts both personal and bystander privacy. An additional survey of pet owners (N=201) eliciting what factors would cause them to not purchase (or stop using) pet wearables indicated comparably few privacy concerns, strengthening the representativeness of our findings. A thematic analysis reveals that the lack of privacy concerns may be explained by, among other factors, emotional drivers to purchase the device, and prioritization of (desired) functionality to support those emotional drivers over privacy requirements. Moreover, we found that pet wearables are used in different ways than originally intended, which raise novel privacy implications to be dealt with. We propose that in order to move towards more privacy-conscious use of pet wearables, a combination of understanding consumer rationale and behavior as well as ensuring data protection legislation is adequate to real-world use is needed.https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2020-0009human factorsusability and user-centered design for petsmachine learning and privacymobile devices and privacy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author van der Linden Dirk
Edwards Matthew
Hadar Irit
Zamansky Anna
spellingShingle van der Linden Dirk
Edwards Matthew
Hadar Irit
Zamansky Anna
Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables
Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
human factors
usability and user-centered design for pets
machine learning and privacy
mobile devices and privacy
author_facet van der Linden Dirk
Edwards Matthew
Hadar Irit
Zamansky Anna
author_sort van der Linden Dirk
title Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables
title_short Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables
title_full Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables
title_fullStr Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables
title_full_unstemmed Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables
title_sort pets without pets: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables
publisher Sciendo
series Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
issn 2299-0984
publishDate 2020-01-01
description We report on a mixed-method, comparative study investigating whether there is a difference between privacy concerns expressed about pet wearables as opposed to human wearables – and more importantly, why. We extracted the privacy concerns found in product reviews (N=8,038) of pet wearables (activity, location, and dual-function trackers), contrasting the (lack of) concerns and misuse to a curated set of reviews for similar human-oriented wearables (N=20,431). Our findings indicate that, while overall very few privacy concerns are expressed in product reviews, for pet wearables they are expressed even less, even though consumers use these devices in a manner which impacts both personal and bystander privacy. An additional survey of pet owners (N=201) eliciting what factors would cause them to not purchase (or stop using) pet wearables indicated comparably few privacy concerns, strengthening the representativeness of our findings. A thematic analysis reveals that the lack of privacy concerns may be explained by, among other factors, emotional drivers to purchase the device, and prioritization of (desired) functionality to support those emotional drivers over privacy requirements. Moreover, we found that pet wearables are used in different ways than originally intended, which raise novel privacy implications to be dealt with. We propose that in order to move towards more privacy-conscious use of pet wearables, a combination of understanding consumer rationale and behavior as well as ensuring data protection legislation is adequate to real-world use is needed.
topic human factors
usability and user-centered design for pets
machine learning and privacy
mobile devices and privacy
url https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2020-0009
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderlindendirk petswithoutpetsonpetownersunderestimationofprivacyconcernsinpetwearables
AT edwardsmatthew petswithoutpetsonpetownersunderestimationofprivacyconcernsinpetwearables
AT hadaririt petswithoutpetsonpetownersunderestimationofprivacyconcernsinpetwearables
AT zamanskyanna petswithoutpetsonpetownersunderestimationofprivacyconcernsinpetwearables
_version_ 1717810647078535168