Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables
We report on a mixed-method, comparative study investigating whether there is a difference between privacy concerns expressed about pet wearables as opposed to human wearables – and more importantly, why. We extracted the privacy concerns found in product reviews (N=8,038) of pet wearables (activity...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2020-0009 |
id |
doaj-d9a93fc3f31e4cf4b74e134228ba8da4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d9a93fc3f31e4cf4b74e134228ba8da42021-09-05T14:01:10ZengSciendoProceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies2299-09842020-01-012020114316410.2478/popets-2020-0009popets-2020-0009Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearablesvan der Linden Dirk0Edwards Matthew1Hadar Irit2Zamansky Anna3Bristol Cyber Security Group, University of BristolBristol Cyber Security Group, University of BristolDepartment of Information Systems, University of HaifaDepartment of Information Systems, University of HaifaWe report on a mixed-method, comparative study investigating whether there is a difference between privacy concerns expressed about pet wearables as opposed to human wearables – and more importantly, why. We extracted the privacy concerns found in product reviews (N=8,038) of pet wearables (activity, location, and dual-function trackers), contrasting the (lack of) concerns and misuse to a curated set of reviews for similar human-oriented wearables (N=20,431). Our findings indicate that, while overall very few privacy concerns are expressed in product reviews, for pet wearables they are expressed even less, even though consumers use these devices in a manner which impacts both personal and bystander privacy. An additional survey of pet owners (N=201) eliciting what factors would cause them to not purchase (or stop using) pet wearables indicated comparably few privacy concerns, strengthening the representativeness of our findings. A thematic analysis reveals that the lack of privacy concerns may be explained by, among other factors, emotional drivers to purchase the device, and prioritization of (desired) functionality to support those emotional drivers over privacy requirements. Moreover, we found that pet wearables are used in different ways than originally intended, which raise novel privacy implications to be dealt with. We propose that in order to move towards more privacy-conscious use of pet wearables, a combination of understanding consumer rationale and behavior as well as ensuring data protection legislation is adequate to real-world use is needed.https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2020-0009human factorsusability and user-centered design for petsmachine learning and privacymobile devices and privacy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
van der Linden Dirk Edwards Matthew Hadar Irit Zamansky Anna |
spellingShingle |
van der Linden Dirk Edwards Matthew Hadar Irit Zamansky Anna Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies human factors usability and user-centered design for pets machine learning and privacy mobile devices and privacy |
author_facet |
van der Linden Dirk Edwards Matthew Hadar Irit Zamansky Anna |
author_sort |
van der Linden Dirk |
title |
Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables |
title_short |
Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables |
title_full |
Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables |
title_fullStr |
Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pets without PETs: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables |
title_sort |
pets without pets: on pet owners’ under-estimation of privacy concerns in pet wearables |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies |
issn |
2299-0984 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
We report on a mixed-method, comparative study investigating whether there is a difference between privacy concerns expressed about pet wearables as opposed to human wearables – and more importantly, why. We extracted the privacy concerns found in product reviews (N=8,038) of pet wearables (activity, location, and dual-function trackers), contrasting the (lack of) concerns and misuse to a curated set of reviews for similar human-oriented wearables (N=20,431). Our findings indicate that, while overall very few privacy concerns are expressed in product reviews, for pet wearables they are expressed even less, even though consumers use these devices in a manner which impacts both personal and bystander privacy. An additional survey of pet owners (N=201) eliciting what factors would cause them to not purchase (or stop using) pet wearables indicated comparably few privacy concerns, strengthening the representativeness of our findings. A thematic analysis reveals that the lack of privacy concerns may be explained by, among other factors, emotional drivers to purchase the device, and prioritization of (desired) functionality to support those emotional drivers over privacy requirements. Moreover, we found that pet wearables are used in different ways than originally intended, which raise novel privacy implications to be dealt with. We propose that in order to move towards more privacy-conscious use of pet wearables, a combination of understanding consumer rationale and behavior as well as ensuring data protection legislation is adequate to real-world use is needed. |
topic |
human factors usability and user-centered design for pets machine learning and privacy mobile devices and privacy |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2020-0009 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vanderlindendirk petswithoutpetsonpetownersunderestimationofprivacyconcernsinpetwearables AT edwardsmatthew petswithoutpetsonpetownersunderestimationofprivacyconcernsinpetwearables AT hadaririt petswithoutpetsonpetownersunderestimationofprivacyconcernsinpetwearables AT zamanskyanna petswithoutpetsonpetownersunderestimationofprivacyconcernsinpetwearables |
_version_ |
1717810647078535168 |