Comparison of HemoCue<sup>® </sup>hemoglobin-meter and automated hematology analyzer in measurement of hemoglobin levels in pregnant women at Khartoum hospital, Sudan

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Assessment of hemoglobin is one of the most reliable indicators for anemia, and is widely used to screen for anemia among pregnant women. The HemoCue<sup>® </sup>has been widely used for as a point-of-care device for hemo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adam Ishag, Ahmed Samah, Mahmoud Mahmoud H, Yassin Mohammed I
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-03-01
Series:Diagnostic Pathology
Online Access:http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/7/1/30
id doaj-d9990a852ab3434b8de74bf4f8bfe054
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d9990a852ab3434b8de74bf4f8bfe0542020-11-25T00:23:57ZengBMCDiagnostic Pathology1746-15962012-03-01713010.1186/1746-1596-7-30Comparison of HemoCue<sup>® </sup>hemoglobin-meter and automated hematology analyzer in measurement of hemoglobin levels in pregnant women at Khartoum hospital, SudanAdam IshagAhmed SamahMahmoud Mahmoud HYassin Mohammed I<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Assessment of hemoglobin is one of the most reliable indicators for anemia, and is widely used to screen for anemia among pregnant women. The HemoCue<sup>® </sup>has been widely used for as a point-of-care device for hemoglobin estimation in health facilities. Previous studies showed contradictory results regarding the accuracy of HemoCue<sup>®</sup>.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This was a hospital-based cross sectional study carried- out among pregnant women at Khartoum hospital in Sudan to find out whether the measurement of hemoglobin concentration by HemoCue<sup>® </sup>using venous or capillary samples was comparable to that of the automated hematology analyzer as standard. Bland and Altman method was used to compare the measurements with an acceptable difference of ± 1.0 g/dl.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Among the 108 subjects in this study the mean (SD) level of hemoglobin level using HemoCue<sup>® </sup>venous sample, HemoCue<sup>® </sup>capillary sample and automated hematology analyzer were 12.70 (1.77), 12.87 (2.04) and 11.53 (1.63) g/dl, respectively. Although the correlations between the measurements were all significant there was no agreement between HemoCue<sup>® </sup>and automated hematology analyzer. The bias + SD (limits of agreement) for HemoCue<sup>® </sup>venous versus hematology analyzer was 1.17 ± 1.57 (-1.97, 4.31) g/dl, HemoCue<sup>® </sup>capillary versus hematology analyzer was 1.34 ± 1.85 (-2.36, 5.04) g/dl, and HemoCue<sup>® </sup>venous versus HemoCue<sup>® </sup>capillary samples was 017 ± 1.90 and (3.97-3.63) g/dl.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Hemoglobin concentration assessment by HemoCue<sup>® </sup>using either venous or capillary blood samples has shown unacceptable agreement with automated hematology analyzer.</p> <p>Virtual slides</p> <p>The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: <url>http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/8797022296725036</url></p> http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/7/1/30
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adam Ishag
Ahmed Samah
Mahmoud Mahmoud H
Yassin Mohammed I
spellingShingle Adam Ishag
Ahmed Samah
Mahmoud Mahmoud H
Yassin Mohammed I
Comparison of HemoCue<sup>® </sup>hemoglobin-meter and automated hematology analyzer in measurement of hemoglobin levels in pregnant women at Khartoum hospital, Sudan
Diagnostic Pathology
author_facet Adam Ishag
Ahmed Samah
Mahmoud Mahmoud H
Yassin Mohammed I
author_sort Adam Ishag
title Comparison of HemoCue<sup>® </sup>hemoglobin-meter and automated hematology analyzer in measurement of hemoglobin levels in pregnant women at Khartoum hospital, Sudan
title_short Comparison of HemoCue<sup>® </sup>hemoglobin-meter and automated hematology analyzer in measurement of hemoglobin levels in pregnant women at Khartoum hospital, Sudan
title_full Comparison of HemoCue<sup>® </sup>hemoglobin-meter and automated hematology analyzer in measurement of hemoglobin levels in pregnant women at Khartoum hospital, Sudan
title_fullStr Comparison of HemoCue<sup>® </sup>hemoglobin-meter and automated hematology analyzer in measurement of hemoglobin levels in pregnant women at Khartoum hospital, Sudan
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of HemoCue<sup>® </sup>hemoglobin-meter and automated hematology analyzer in measurement of hemoglobin levels in pregnant women at Khartoum hospital, Sudan
title_sort comparison of hemocue<sup>® </sup>hemoglobin-meter and automated hematology analyzer in measurement of hemoglobin levels in pregnant women at khartoum hospital, sudan
publisher BMC
series Diagnostic Pathology
issn 1746-1596
publishDate 2012-03-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Assessment of hemoglobin is one of the most reliable indicators for anemia, and is widely used to screen for anemia among pregnant women. The HemoCue<sup>® </sup>has been widely used for as a point-of-care device for hemoglobin estimation in health facilities. Previous studies showed contradictory results regarding the accuracy of HemoCue<sup>®</sup>.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This was a hospital-based cross sectional study carried- out among pregnant women at Khartoum hospital in Sudan to find out whether the measurement of hemoglobin concentration by HemoCue<sup>® </sup>using venous or capillary samples was comparable to that of the automated hematology analyzer as standard. Bland and Altman method was used to compare the measurements with an acceptable difference of ± 1.0 g/dl.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Among the 108 subjects in this study the mean (SD) level of hemoglobin level using HemoCue<sup>® </sup>venous sample, HemoCue<sup>® </sup>capillary sample and automated hematology analyzer were 12.70 (1.77), 12.87 (2.04) and 11.53 (1.63) g/dl, respectively. Although the correlations between the measurements were all significant there was no agreement between HemoCue<sup>® </sup>and automated hematology analyzer. The bias + SD (limits of agreement) for HemoCue<sup>® </sup>venous versus hematology analyzer was 1.17 ± 1.57 (-1.97, 4.31) g/dl, HemoCue<sup>® </sup>capillary versus hematology analyzer was 1.34 ± 1.85 (-2.36, 5.04) g/dl, and HemoCue<sup>® </sup>venous versus HemoCue<sup>® </sup>capillary samples was 017 ± 1.90 and (3.97-3.63) g/dl.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Hemoglobin concentration assessment by HemoCue<sup>® </sup>using either venous or capillary blood samples has shown unacceptable agreement with automated hematology analyzer.</p> <p>Virtual slides</p> <p>The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: <url>http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/8797022296725036</url></p>
url http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/7/1/30
work_keys_str_mv AT adamishag comparisonofhemocuesupsuphemoglobinmeterandautomatedhematologyanalyzerinmeasurementofhemoglobinlevelsinpregnantwomenatkhartoumhospitalsudan
AT ahmedsamah comparisonofhemocuesupsuphemoglobinmeterandautomatedhematologyanalyzerinmeasurementofhemoglobinlevelsinpregnantwomenatkhartoumhospitalsudan
AT mahmoudmahmoudh comparisonofhemocuesupsuphemoglobinmeterandautomatedhematologyanalyzerinmeasurementofhemoglobinlevelsinpregnantwomenatkhartoumhospitalsudan
AT yassinmohammedi comparisonofhemocuesupsuphemoglobinmeterandautomatedhematologyanalyzerinmeasurementofhemoglobinlevelsinpregnantwomenatkhartoumhospitalsudan
_version_ 1725354794933026816