Optimal concentration of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as an irrigation solution additive to reduce infection rates in rat models of contaminated wound

Aims: In wound irrigation, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is more efficacious than normal saline (NS) in removing bacteria from a contaminated wound. However, the optimal EDTA concentration remains unknown for different animal wound models. Methods: The cell toxicity of different concen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junqing Lin, Tao Gao, Haifeng Wei, Hongyi Zhu, Xianyou Zheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021-01-01
Series:Bone & Joint Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2046-3758.101.BJR-2020-0338.R1
id doaj-d99264b8d22e4fb28bedd83c12e3178f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d99264b8d22e4fb28bedd83c12e3178f2021-01-29T14:14:34ZengThe British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint SurgeryBone & Joint Research2046-37582021-01-01101687610.1302/2046-3758.101.BJR-2020-0338.R1Optimal concentration of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as an irrigation solution additive to reduce infection rates in rat models of contaminated woundJunqing Lin0Tao Gao1Haifeng Wei2Hongyi Zhu3Xianyou Zheng4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaAims: In wound irrigation, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is more efficacious than normal saline (NS) in removing bacteria from a contaminated wound. However, the optimal EDTA concentration remains unknown for different animal wound models. Methods: The cell toxicity of different concentrations of EDTA dissolved in NS (EDTA-NS) was assessed by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8). Various concentrations of EDTA-NS irrigation solution were compared in three female Sprague-Dawley rat models: 1) a skin defect; 2) a bone exposed; and 3) a wound with an intra-articular implant. All three models were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli. EDTA was dissolved at a concentration of 0 (as control), 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 50, and 100 mM in sterile NS. Samples were collected from the wounds and cultured. The bacterial culture-positive rate (colony formation) and infection rate (pus formation) of each treatment group were compared after irrigation and debridement. Results: Cell viability intervened below 10 mM concentrations of EDTA-NS showed no cytotoxicity. Concentrations of 1, 2, and 5 mM EDTA-NS had lower rates of infection and positive cultures for S. aureus and E. coli compared with other concentrations in the skin defect model. For the bone exposed model, 0.5, 1, and 2 mM EDTA-NS had lower rates of infection and positive cultures. For intra-articular implant models 10 and 50 mM, EDTA-NS had the lowest rates of infection and positive cultures. Conclusion: The concentrations of EDTA-NS below 10 mM are safe for irrigation. The optimal concentration of EDTA-NS varies by type of wound after experimental inoculation of three types of wound.https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2046-3758.101.BJR-2020-0338.R1antibacterial agentstherapeutic irrigationsurgical wound infection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Junqing Lin
Tao Gao
Haifeng Wei
Hongyi Zhu
Xianyou Zheng
spellingShingle Junqing Lin
Tao Gao
Haifeng Wei
Hongyi Zhu
Xianyou Zheng
Optimal concentration of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as an irrigation solution additive to reduce infection rates in rat models of contaminated wound
Bone & Joint Research
antibacterial agents
therapeutic irrigation
surgical wound infection
author_facet Junqing Lin
Tao Gao
Haifeng Wei
Hongyi Zhu
Xianyou Zheng
author_sort Junqing Lin
title Optimal concentration of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as an irrigation solution additive to reduce infection rates in rat models of contaminated wound
title_short Optimal concentration of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as an irrigation solution additive to reduce infection rates in rat models of contaminated wound
title_full Optimal concentration of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as an irrigation solution additive to reduce infection rates in rat models of contaminated wound
title_fullStr Optimal concentration of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as an irrigation solution additive to reduce infection rates in rat models of contaminated wound
title_full_unstemmed Optimal concentration of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as an irrigation solution additive to reduce infection rates in rat models of contaminated wound
title_sort optimal concentration of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as an irrigation solution additive to reduce infection rates in rat models of contaminated wound
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
series Bone & Joint Research
issn 2046-3758
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Aims: In wound irrigation, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is more efficacious than normal saline (NS) in removing bacteria from a contaminated wound. However, the optimal EDTA concentration remains unknown for different animal wound models. Methods: The cell toxicity of different concentrations of EDTA dissolved in NS (EDTA-NS) was assessed by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8). Various concentrations of EDTA-NS irrigation solution were compared in three female Sprague-Dawley rat models: 1) a skin defect; 2) a bone exposed; and 3) a wound with an intra-articular implant. All three models were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli. EDTA was dissolved at a concentration of 0 (as control), 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 50, and 100 mM in sterile NS. Samples were collected from the wounds and cultured. The bacterial culture-positive rate (colony formation) and infection rate (pus formation) of each treatment group were compared after irrigation and debridement. Results: Cell viability intervened below 10 mM concentrations of EDTA-NS showed no cytotoxicity. Concentrations of 1, 2, and 5 mM EDTA-NS had lower rates of infection and positive cultures for S. aureus and E. coli compared with other concentrations in the skin defect model. For the bone exposed model, 0.5, 1, and 2 mM EDTA-NS had lower rates of infection and positive cultures. For intra-articular implant models 10 and 50 mM, EDTA-NS had the lowest rates of infection and positive cultures. Conclusion: The concentrations of EDTA-NS below 10 mM are safe for irrigation. The optimal concentration of EDTA-NS varies by type of wound after experimental inoculation of three types of wound.
topic antibacterial agents
therapeutic irrigation
surgical wound infection
url https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2046-3758.101.BJR-2020-0338.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT junqinglin optimalconcentrationofethylenediaminetetraaceticacidasanirrigationsolutionadditivetoreduceinfectionratesinratmodelsofcontaminatedwound
AT taogao optimalconcentrationofethylenediaminetetraaceticacidasanirrigationsolutionadditivetoreduceinfectionratesinratmodelsofcontaminatedwound
AT haifengwei optimalconcentrationofethylenediaminetetraaceticacidasanirrigationsolutionadditivetoreduceinfectionratesinratmodelsofcontaminatedwound
AT hongyizhu optimalconcentrationofethylenediaminetetraaceticacidasanirrigationsolutionadditivetoreduceinfectionratesinratmodelsofcontaminatedwound
AT xianyouzheng optimalconcentrationofethylenediaminetetraaceticacidasanirrigationsolutionadditivetoreduceinfectionratesinratmodelsofcontaminatedwound
_version_ 1724318835969884160