Adjacency and Area Explain Species Bioregional Shifts in Neotropical Palms

Environmental and geographical variables are known drivers of community assembly, however their influence on phylogenetic structure and phylogenetic beta diversity of lineages within different bioregions is not well-understood. Using Neotropical palms as a model, we investigate how environmental and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cintia G. Freitas, Christine D. Bacon, Advaldo C. Souza-Neto, Rosane G. Collevatti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2019.00055/full
id doaj-d98c67b20aa443839d34d02a43b42ca9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d98c67b20aa443839d34d02a43b42ca92020-11-24T20:40:43ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2019-02-011010.3389/fpls.2019.00055385827Adjacency and Area Explain Species Bioregional Shifts in Neotropical PalmsCintia G. Freitas0Christine D. Bacon1Christine D. Bacon2Christine D. Bacon3Advaldo C. Souza-Neto4Rosane G. Collevatti5Laboratório de Genética & Biodiversidade, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, BrazilLaboratório de Genética & Biodiversidade, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, BrazilDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenGothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Gothenburg, SwedenLaboratório de Genética & Biodiversidade, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, BrazilLaboratório de Genética & Biodiversidade, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, BrazilEnvironmental and geographical variables are known drivers of community assembly, however their influence on phylogenetic structure and phylogenetic beta diversity of lineages within different bioregions is not well-understood. Using Neotropical palms as a model, we investigate how environmental and geographical variables affect the assembly of lineages into bioregions across an evolutionary time scale. We also determine lineage shifts between tropical (TRF) and non-tropical (non-TRF) forests. Our results identify that distance and area explain phylogenetic dissimilarity among bioregions. Lineages in smaller bioregions are a subset of larger bioregions and contribute significantly to the nestedness component of phylogenetic dissimilarity, here interpreted as evidence for a bioregional shift. We found a significant tendency of habitat shifts occurring preferentially between TRF and non-TRF bioregions (31 shifts) than from non-TRF to TRF (24) or from TRF to TRF (11) and non-TRF to non-TRF (9). Our results also present cases where low dissimilarity is found between TRF and non-TRF bioregions. Most bioregions showed phylogenetic clustering and larger bioregions tended to be more clustered than smaller ones, with a higher species turnover component of phylogenetic dissimilarity. However, phylogenetic structure did not differ between TRF and non-TRF bioregions and diversification rates were higher in only two lineages, Attaleinae and Bactridinae, which are widespread and overabundant in both TRF and non-TRF bioregions. Area and distance significantly affected Neotropical palm community assembly and contributed more than environmental variables. Despite palms being emblematic humid forest elements, we found multiple shifts from humid to dry bioregions, showing that palms are also important components of these environments.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2019.00055/fullarecaceaecommunity phylogeneticsgeographical variablesphylogenetic nestednessphylogenetic turnover
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cintia G. Freitas
Christine D. Bacon
Christine D. Bacon
Christine D. Bacon
Advaldo C. Souza-Neto
Rosane G. Collevatti
spellingShingle Cintia G. Freitas
Christine D. Bacon
Christine D. Bacon
Christine D. Bacon
Advaldo C. Souza-Neto
Rosane G. Collevatti
Adjacency and Area Explain Species Bioregional Shifts in Neotropical Palms
Frontiers in Plant Science
arecaceae
community phylogenetics
geographical variables
phylogenetic nestedness
phylogenetic turnover
author_facet Cintia G. Freitas
Christine D. Bacon
Christine D. Bacon
Christine D. Bacon
Advaldo C. Souza-Neto
Rosane G. Collevatti
author_sort Cintia G. Freitas
title Adjacency and Area Explain Species Bioregional Shifts in Neotropical Palms
title_short Adjacency and Area Explain Species Bioregional Shifts in Neotropical Palms
title_full Adjacency and Area Explain Species Bioregional Shifts in Neotropical Palms
title_fullStr Adjacency and Area Explain Species Bioregional Shifts in Neotropical Palms
title_full_unstemmed Adjacency and Area Explain Species Bioregional Shifts in Neotropical Palms
title_sort adjacency and area explain species bioregional shifts in neotropical palms
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Plant Science
issn 1664-462X
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Environmental and geographical variables are known drivers of community assembly, however their influence on phylogenetic structure and phylogenetic beta diversity of lineages within different bioregions is not well-understood. Using Neotropical palms as a model, we investigate how environmental and geographical variables affect the assembly of lineages into bioregions across an evolutionary time scale. We also determine lineage shifts between tropical (TRF) and non-tropical (non-TRF) forests. Our results identify that distance and area explain phylogenetic dissimilarity among bioregions. Lineages in smaller bioregions are a subset of larger bioregions and contribute significantly to the nestedness component of phylogenetic dissimilarity, here interpreted as evidence for a bioregional shift. We found a significant tendency of habitat shifts occurring preferentially between TRF and non-TRF bioregions (31 shifts) than from non-TRF to TRF (24) or from TRF to TRF (11) and non-TRF to non-TRF (9). Our results also present cases where low dissimilarity is found between TRF and non-TRF bioregions. Most bioregions showed phylogenetic clustering and larger bioregions tended to be more clustered than smaller ones, with a higher species turnover component of phylogenetic dissimilarity. However, phylogenetic structure did not differ between TRF and non-TRF bioregions and diversification rates were higher in only two lineages, Attaleinae and Bactridinae, which are widespread and overabundant in both TRF and non-TRF bioregions. Area and distance significantly affected Neotropical palm community assembly and contributed more than environmental variables. Despite palms being emblematic humid forest elements, we found multiple shifts from humid to dry bioregions, showing that palms are also important components of these environments.
topic arecaceae
community phylogenetics
geographical variables
phylogenetic nestedness
phylogenetic turnover
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2019.00055/full
work_keys_str_mv AT cintiagfreitas adjacencyandareaexplainspeciesbioregionalshiftsinneotropicalpalms
AT christinedbacon adjacencyandareaexplainspeciesbioregionalshiftsinneotropicalpalms
AT christinedbacon adjacencyandareaexplainspeciesbioregionalshiftsinneotropicalpalms
AT christinedbacon adjacencyandareaexplainspeciesbioregionalshiftsinneotropicalpalms
AT advaldocsouzaneto adjacencyandareaexplainspeciesbioregionalshiftsinneotropicalpalms
AT rosanegcollevatti adjacencyandareaexplainspeciesbioregionalshiftsinneotropicalpalms
_version_ 1716825907319013376