Minimum Variance Signal Selection for Aorta Radius Estimation Using Radar
This paper studies the optimum signal choice for the estimation of the aortic blood pressure via aorta radius, using a monostatic radar configuration. The method involves developing the Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for a simplified model. The CRLB for model parameters are compared with sim...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2010-01-01
|
Series: | EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/682037 |
id |
doaj-d9877cc2bb65432686dd13daf6cff4af |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d9877cc2bb65432686dd13daf6cff4af2020-11-25T00:26:09ZengSpringerOpenEURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing1687-61721687-61802010-01-01201010.1155/2010/682037Minimum Variance Signal Selection for Aorta Radius Estimation Using RadarLars Erik SolbergSvein-Erik HamranTor BergerIlangko BalasinghamThis paper studies the optimum signal choice for the estimation of the aortic blood pressure via aorta radius, using a monostatic radar configuration. The method involves developing the Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for a simplified model. The CRLB for model parameters are compared with simulation results using a grid-based approach for estimation. The CRLBs are within the 99% confidence intervals for all chosen parameter values. The CRLBs show an optimal region within an ellipsoid centered at 1 GHz center frequency and 1.25 GHz bandwidth with axes of 0.5 GHz and 1 GHz, respectively. Calculations show that emitted signal energy to received noise spectral density should exceed 1012 for a precision of approximately 0.1 mm for a large range of model parameters. This implies a minimum average power of 0.4 μW. These values are based on optimistic assumptions. Reflections, improved propagation model, true receiver noise, and parameter ranges should be considered in a practical implementation. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/682037 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lars Erik Solberg Svein-Erik Hamran Tor Berger Ilangko Balasingham |
spellingShingle |
Lars Erik Solberg Svein-Erik Hamran Tor Berger Ilangko Balasingham Minimum Variance Signal Selection for Aorta Radius Estimation Using Radar EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing |
author_facet |
Lars Erik Solberg Svein-Erik Hamran Tor Berger Ilangko Balasingham |
author_sort |
Lars Erik Solberg |
title |
Minimum Variance Signal Selection for Aorta Radius Estimation Using Radar |
title_short |
Minimum Variance Signal Selection for Aorta Radius Estimation Using Radar |
title_full |
Minimum Variance Signal Selection for Aorta Radius Estimation Using Radar |
title_fullStr |
Minimum Variance Signal Selection for Aorta Radius Estimation Using Radar |
title_full_unstemmed |
Minimum Variance Signal Selection for Aorta Radius Estimation Using Radar |
title_sort |
minimum variance signal selection for aorta radius estimation using radar |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing |
issn |
1687-6172 1687-6180 |
publishDate |
2010-01-01 |
description |
This paper studies the optimum signal choice for the estimation of the aortic blood pressure via aorta radius, using a monostatic radar configuration. The method involves developing the Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for a simplified model. The CRLB for model parameters are compared with simulation results using a grid-based approach for estimation. The CRLBs are within the 99% confidence intervals for all chosen parameter values. The CRLBs show an optimal region within an ellipsoid centered at 1 GHz center frequency and 1.25 GHz bandwidth with axes of 0.5 GHz and 1 GHz, respectively. Calculations show that emitted signal energy to received noise spectral density should exceed 1012 for a precision of approximately 0.1 mm for a large range of model parameters. This implies a minimum average power of 0.4 μW. These values are based on optimistic assumptions. Reflections, improved propagation model, true receiver noise, and parameter ranges should be considered in a practical implementation. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/682037 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT larseriksolberg minimumvariancesignalselectionforaortaradiusestimationusingradar AT sveinerikhamran minimumvariancesignalselectionforaortaradiusestimationusingradar AT torberger minimumvariancesignalselectionforaortaradiusestimationusingradar AT ilangkobalasingham minimumvariancesignalselectionforaortaradiusestimationusingradar |
_version_ |
1725345744233168896 |