Object individuation by iconic content: How is numerosity represented in iconic representation?

• Main Author: Athanasios Raftopoulos
• Format: Article
• Language: deu
• Published: Mimesis Edizioni, Milano 2020-04-01
• Series: Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia
• Subjects: early vision; analog representation; object individuation; arithmetic cognition; cardinality of sets
• Online Access: https://www.rifp.it/ojs/index.php/rifp/article/view/rifp.2020.0003/1010
• ISSN: 2039-4667; 2239-2629

Fodor argues that perceptual representations are a subset of iconic representations, which are distinguished from symbolic/discursive representations. Iconic representations are nonconceptual (NCC) and they do not support the abilities afforded by concepts. Iconic representations, for example, cannot support object individuation. If someone thinks that perception or some of its parts has imagistic NCC, they face the following dilemma. Either they will have to accept that this NCC does not allow for object individuation, but it represents instead conglomerations of properties and at some stage of visual processing it must interface with cognition and its conceptual capacities for the visual objects to be individuated. Or, they will have to hold that the imagistic, NCC of (or, a stage of) perception, allows for object individuation. I opt for the second thesis because I think there is strong empirical evidence that objects are individuated during early vision. I also think that early vision individuates objects by means of, what I had previously called nonconceptual perceptual demonstrative reference. I argue, first, why Fodor’s view that iconic NCC does not enable object individuation is false. I also argue, contra Fodor, that early vision allows the perception of the cardinality of sets of objects.