Can we determine whether physical limitations are more prevalent in the US than in countries with comparable life expectancy?

We evaluate the variability in estimates of self-reported physical limitations by age across four nationally representative surveys in the US. We consider its implications for determining whether, as previous literature suggests, the US estimates reveal limitations at an earlier age than in three co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dana A. Glei, Noreen Goldman, Carol D. Ryff, Maxine Weinstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-12-01
Series:SSM: Population Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827317300770
id doaj-d96b5c8097d24bbebbd331fd5f3406dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d96b5c8097d24bbebbd331fd5f3406dd2020-11-24T22:10:29ZengElsevierSSM: Population Health2352-82732017-12-013C80881310.1016/j.ssmph.2017.07.008Can we determine whether physical limitations are more prevalent in the US than in countries with comparable life expectancy?Dana A. Glei0Noreen Goldman1Carol D. Ryff2Maxine Weinstein3Center for Population and Health, Georgetown University, Mailing address: 5985 San Aleso Court, Santa Rosa, CA 95409-3912, USA Office of Population Research and Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, 243 Wallace Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544-2091, USADepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1300 University Avenue, 2245 MSC, Madison, WI 53706, USACenter for Population and Health, Georgetown University, 312 Healy Hall, 37th & O Streets, NW, Washington, DC 20057-1197, USAWe evaluate the variability in estimates of self-reported physical limitations by age across four nationally representative surveys in the US. We consider its implications for determining whether, as previous literature suggests, the US estimates reveal limitations at an earlier age than in three countries with similar life expectancy: England, Taiwan, and Costa Rica. Based on cross-sectional data from seven population-based surveys, we use local mean smoothing to plot self-reported limitations by age for each of four physical tasks for each survey, stratified by sex. We find substantial variation in the estimates in the US across four nationally-representative surveys. For example, one US survey suggests that American women experience a walking limitation 15 years earlier than their Costa Rican counterparts, while another US survey implies that Americans have a 4-year advantage. Differences in mode of survey may account for higher prevalence of limitations in the one survey that used a self-administered mail-in questionnaire than in the other surveys that used in-person or telephone interviews. Yet, even among US surveys that used the same mode, there is still so much variability in estimates that we cannot conclude whether Americans have better or worse function than their counterparts in the other countries. Seemingly minor differences in question wording and response categories may account for the remaining inconsistency. If minor differences in question wording can result in such extensive variation in the estimates within a given population, then lack of comparability is likely to be an even greater problem when examining results across countries that do not share the same language or culture. Despite the potential utility of self-reported physical function within a survey sample, our findings imply that absolute estimates of population-level prevalence of self-reported physical limitations are unlikely to be strictly comparable across countries—or even across surveys within the same population.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827317300770Survey dataSelf-reportComparativePhysical functionPhysical limitationsUnited States
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dana A. Glei
Noreen Goldman
Carol D. Ryff
Maxine Weinstein
spellingShingle Dana A. Glei
Noreen Goldman
Carol D. Ryff
Maxine Weinstein
Can we determine whether physical limitations are more prevalent in the US than in countries with comparable life expectancy?
SSM: Population Health
Survey data
Self-report
Comparative
Physical function
Physical limitations
United States
author_facet Dana A. Glei
Noreen Goldman
Carol D. Ryff
Maxine Weinstein
author_sort Dana A. Glei
title Can we determine whether physical limitations are more prevalent in the US than in countries with comparable life expectancy?
title_short Can we determine whether physical limitations are more prevalent in the US than in countries with comparable life expectancy?
title_full Can we determine whether physical limitations are more prevalent in the US than in countries with comparable life expectancy?
title_fullStr Can we determine whether physical limitations are more prevalent in the US than in countries with comparable life expectancy?
title_full_unstemmed Can we determine whether physical limitations are more prevalent in the US than in countries with comparable life expectancy?
title_sort can we determine whether physical limitations are more prevalent in the us than in countries with comparable life expectancy?
publisher Elsevier
series SSM: Population Health
issn 2352-8273
publishDate 2017-12-01
description We evaluate the variability in estimates of self-reported physical limitations by age across four nationally representative surveys in the US. We consider its implications for determining whether, as previous literature suggests, the US estimates reveal limitations at an earlier age than in three countries with similar life expectancy: England, Taiwan, and Costa Rica. Based on cross-sectional data from seven population-based surveys, we use local mean smoothing to plot self-reported limitations by age for each of four physical tasks for each survey, stratified by sex. We find substantial variation in the estimates in the US across four nationally-representative surveys. For example, one US survey suggests that American women experience a walking limitation 15 years earlier than their Costa Rican counterparts, while another US survey implies that Americans have a 4-year advantage. Differences in mode of survey may account for higher prevalence of limitations in the one survey that used a self-administered mail-in questionnaire than in the other surveys that used in-person or telephone interviews. Yet, even among US surveys that used the same mode, there is still so much variability in estimates that we cannot conclude whether Americans have better or worse function than their counterparts in the other countries. Seemingly minor differences in question wording and response categories may account for the remaining inconsistency. If minor differences in question wording can result in such extensive variation in the estimates within a given population, then lack of comparability is likely to be an even greater problem when examining results across countries that do not share the same language or culture. Despite the potential utility of self-reported physical function within a survey sample, our findings imply that absolute estimates of population-level prevalence of self-reported physical limitations are unlikely to be strictly comparable across countries—or even across surveys within the same population.
topic Survey data
Self-report
Comparative
Physical function
Physical limitations
United States
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827317300770
work_keys_str_mv AT danaaglei canwedeterminewhetherphysicallimitationsaremoreprevalentintheusthanincountrieswithcomparablelifeexpectancy
AT noreengoldman canwedeterminewhetherphysicallimitationsaremoreprevalentintheusthanincountrieswithcomparablelifeexpectancy
AT caroldryff canwedeterminewhetherphysicallimitationsaremoreprevalentintheusthanincountrieswithcomparablelifeexpectancy
AT maxineweinstein canwedeterminewhetherphysicallimitationsaremoreprevalentintheusthanincountrieswithcomparablelifeexpectancy
_version_ 1725807845367087104