Cytokeratin positivity in myxopapillary ependymoma – a potential diagnostic pitfall

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Myxopapillary ependymomas (MPE) occur in the filum terminale of the spinal cord, but also present in extra-spinal locations such as subcutaneous tissue and brain. They are slow growing grade I gliomas. Areas of solid growth pattern w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sur Monalisa, Hussein Sundus A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-10-01
Series:Diagnostic Pathology
Online Access:http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/3/1/40
id doaj-d95da68b7c5c4b0e892634d579e0babb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d95da68b7c5c4b0e892634d579e0babb2020-11-25T00:24:48ZengBMCDiagnostic Pathology1746-15962008-10-01314010.1186/1746-1596-3-40Cytokeratin positivity in myxopapillary ependymoma – a potential diagnostic pitfallSur MonalisaHussein Sundus A<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Myxopapillary ependymomas (MPE) occur in the filum terminale of the spinal cord, but also present in extra-spinal locations such as subcutaneous tissue and brain. They are slow growing grade I gliomas. Areas of solid growth pattern with aggregates of cells with "epithelioid morphology" seen in MPE can mimic metastatic carcinoma. The presence of occasional cells with clear cytoplasm and morphology can resemble Chordoma. Diagnosis can be missed due to these morphological similarities, which could affect patient management and hence, long term survival.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We describe two cases of MPE with cytokeratin (AE1 AE3, CAM 5.2, Cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20) expression.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>MPE can be positive for Cytokeratins (CAM 5.2, AE1 AE3, CK7) and focally for EMA, which could be misdiagnosed as metastatic carcinoma. In cases demonstrating epithelioid and clear cell morphology, the diagnosis of MPE should be made in conjunction with histology, proper immunohistochemical profile which includes co-expression of GFAP, S-100 protein and epithelial markers, radiologic findings and site. It is important to be aware of the cytokeratin profile in MPE to avoid erroneous diagnosis with other tumour entities.</p> http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/3/1/40
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sur Monalisa
Hussein Sundus A
spellingShingle Sur Monalisa
Hussein Sundus A
Cytokeratin positivity in myxopapillary ependymoma – a potential diagnostic pitfall
Diagnostic Pathology
author_facet Sur Monalisa
Hussein Sundus A
author_sort Sur Monalisa
title Cytokeratin positivity in myxopapillary ependymoma – a potential diagnostic pitfall
title_short Cytokeratin positivity in myxopapillary ependymoma – a potential diagnostic pitfall
title_full Cytokeratin positivity in myxopapillary ependymoma – a potential diagnostic pitfall
title_fullStr Cytokeratin positivity in myxopapillary ependymoma – a potential diagnostic pitfall
title_full_unstemmed Cytokeratin positivity in myxopapillary ependymoma – a potential diagnostic pitfall
title_sort cytokeratin positivity in myxopapillary ependymoma – a potential diagnostic pitfall
publisher BMC
series Diagnostic Pathology
issn 1746-1596
publishDate 2008-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Myxopapillary ependymomas (MPE) occur in the filum terminale of the spinal cord, but also present in extra-spinal locations such as subcutaneous tissue and brain. They are slow growing grade I gliomas. Areas of solid growth pattern with aggregates of cells with "epithelioid morphology" seen in MPE can mimic metastatic carcinoma. The presence of occasional cells with clear cytoplasm and morphology can resemble Chordoma. Diagnosis can be missed due to these morphological similarities, which could affect patient management and hence, long term survival.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We describe two cases of MPE with cytokeratin (AE1 AE3, CAM 5.2, Cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20) expression.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>MPE can be positive for Cytokeratins (CAM 5.2, AE1 AE3, CK7) and focally for EMA, which could be misdiagnosed as metastatic carcinoma. In cases demonstrating epithelioid and clear cell morphology, the diagnosis of MPE should be made in conjunction with histology, proper immunohistochemical profile which includes co-expression of GFAP, S-100 protein and epithelial markers, radiologic findings and site. It is important to be aware of the cytokeratin profile in MPE to avoid erroneous diagnosis with other tumour entities.</p>
url http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/3/1/40
work_keys_str_mv AT surmonalisa cytokeratinpositivityinmyxopapillaryependymomaapotentialdiagnosticpitfall
AT husseinsundusa cytokeratinpositivityinmyxopapillaryependymomaapotentialdiagnosticpitfall
_version_ 1725351609223872512