Predicting language recovery in post-stroke aphasia using behavior and functional MRI

Abstract Language outcomes after speech and language therapy in post-stroke aphasia are challenging to predict. This study examines behavioral language measures and resting state fMRI (rsfMRI) as predictors of treatment outcome. Fifty-seven patients with chronic aphasia were recruited and treated fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Iorga, James Higgins, David Caplan, Richard Zinbarg, Swathi Kiran, Cynthia K. Thompson, Brenda Rapp, Todd B. Parrish
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-04-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88022-z
id doaj-d95d3d16dffb4fdcb0c47894a9bcf118
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d95d3d16dffb4fdcb0c47894a9bcf1182021-04-25T11:34:58ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-04-0111111210.1038/s41598-021-88022-zPredicting language recovery in post-stroke aphasia using behavior and functional MRIMichael Iorga0James Higgins1David Caplan2Richard Zinbarg3Swathi Kiran4Cynthia K. Thompson5Brenda Rapp6Todd B. Parrish7Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern UniversityCenter for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern UniversityCenter for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern UniversityCenter for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern UniversityCenter for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern UniversityCenter for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern UniversityCenter for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern UniversityCenter for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern UniversityAbstract Language outcomes after speech and language therapy in post-stroke aphasia are challenging to predict. This study examines behavioral language measures and resting state fMRI (rsfMRI) as predictors of treatment outcome. Fifty-seven patients with chronic aphasia were recruited and treated for one of three aphasia impairments: anomia, agrammatism, or dysgraphia. Treatment effect was measured by performance on a treatment-specific language measure, assessed before and after three months of language therapy. Each patient also underwent an additional 27 language assessments and a rsfMRI scan at baseline. Patient scans were decomposed into 20 components by group independent component analysis, and the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) was calculated for each component time series. Post-treatment performance was modelled with elastic net regression, using pre-treatment performance and either behavioral language measures or fALFF imaging predictors. Analysis showed strong performance for behavioral measures in anomia (R2 = 0.948, n = 28) and for fALFF predictors in agrammatism (R2 = 0.876, n = 11) and dysgraphia (R2 = 0.822, n = 18). Models of language outcomes after treatment trained using rsfMRI features may outperform models trained using behavioral language measures in some patient populations. This suggests that rsfMRI may have prognostic value for aphasia therapy outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88022-z
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Iorga
James Higgins
David Caplan
Richard Zinbarg
Swathi Kiran
Cynthia K. Thompson
Brenda Rapp
Todd B. Parrish
spellingShingle Michael Iorga
James Higgins
David Caplan
Richard Zinbarg
Swathi Kiran
Cynthia K. Thompson
Brenda Rapp
Todd B. Parrish
Predicting language recovery in post-stroke aphasia using behavior and functional MRI
Scientific Reports
author_facet Michael Iorga
James Higgins
David Caplan
Richard Zinbarg
Swathi Kiran
Cynthia K. Thompson
Brenda Rapp
Todd B. Parrish
author_sort Michael Iorga
title Predicting language recovery in post-stroke aphasia using behavior and functional MRI
title_short Predicting language recovery in post-stroke aphasia using behavior and functional MRI
title_full Predicting language recovery in post-stroke aphasia using behavior and functional MRI
title_fullStr Predicting language recovery in post-stroke aphasia using behavior and functional MRI
title_full_unstemmed Predicting language recovery in post-stroke aphasia using behavior and functional MRI
title_sort predicting language recovery in post-stroke aphasia using behavior and functional mri
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Abstract Language outcomes after speech and language therapy in post-stroke aphasia are challenging to predict. This study examines behavioral language measures and resting state fMRI (rsfMRI) as predictors of treatment outcome. Fifty-seven patients with chronic aphasia were recruited and treated for one of three aphasia impairments: anomia, agrammatism, or dysgraphia. Treatment effect was measured by performance on a treatment-specific language measure, assessed before and after three months of language therapy. Each patient also underwent an additional 27 language assessments and a rsfMRI scan at baseline. Patient scans were decomposed into 20 components by group independent component analysis, and the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) was calculated for each component time series. Post-treatment performance was modelled with elastic net regression, using pre-treatment performance and either behavioral language measures or fALFF imaging predictors. Analysis showed strong performance for behavioral measures in anomia (R2 = 0.948, n = 28) and for fALFF predictors in agrammatism (R2 = 0.876, n = 11) and dysgraphia (R2 = 0.822, n = 18). Models of language outcomes after treatment trained using rsfMRI features may outperform models trained using behavioral language measures in some patient populations. This suggests that rsfMRI may have prognostic value for aphasia therapy outcomes.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88022-z
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeliorga predictinglanguagerecoveryinpoststrokeaphasiausingbehaviorandfunctionalmri
AT jameshiggins predictinglanguagerecoveryinpoststrokeaphasiausingbehaviorandfunctionalmri
AT davidcaplan predictinglanguagerecoveryinpoststrokeaphasiausingbehaviorandfunctionalmri
AT richardzinbarg predictinglanguagerecoveryinpoststrokeaphasiausingbehaviorandfunctionalmri
AT swathikiran predictinglanguagerecoveryinpoststrokeaphasiausingbehaviorandfunctionalmri
AT cynthiakthompson predictinglanguagerecoveryinpoststrokeaphasiausingbehaviorandfunctionalmri
AT brendarapp predictinglanguagerecoveryinpoststrokeaphasiausingbehaviorandfunctionalmri
AT toddbparrish predictinglanguagerecoveryinpoststrokeaphasiausingbehaviorandfunctionalmri
_version_ 1721509619440812032