An Analysis of Crohn’s Disease Activity Indices from a Registry of Patients in Eastern Pennsylvania

The objectives of this report were to compare Crohn’s disease patients’ assessment of disease activity and its effect on their well-being to their physician’s assessment of the disease activity and the patient’s well-being; and to use existing Crohn’s disease indices in comparing the severity of Cro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: JF Reed, Linda A Faust
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 1991-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1991/190289
id doaj-d95baa5bb0c646b5a19d050c9190ab3c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d95baa5bb0c646b5a19d050c9190ab3c2020-11-24T23:25:47ZengHindawi LimitedCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology0835-79001991-01-015619920810.1155/1991/190289An Analysis of Crohn’s Disease Activity Indices from a Registry of Patients in Eastern PennsylvaniaJF Reed0Linda A Faust1The Allentown Hospital – Lehigh Valley Hospital Center, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USAThe Allentown Hospital – Lehigh Valley Hospital Center, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USAThe objectives of this report were to compare Crohn’s disease patients’ assessment of disease activity and its effect on their well-being to their physician’s assessment of the disease activity and the patient’s well-being; and to use existing Crohn’s disease indices in comparing the severity of Crohn’s disease across various indices. The indices included in this study were the National Cooperative Crohn’s Disease Study index, the Harvey and Bradshaw Index, the Oxford Index, the Modified Organisation Mondiale de Gastroentérologie Index, the Cape Town Index, the Bristol Index, and the St Marks Index. The comparison of Crohn’s disease patient self-evaluation and physician evaluation of the patient indicates a significant agreement between patient and physician assessment of disease activity (Χ2 41.68, P=0.00001). Cohen’s weighted kappa, a chance-corrected coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, was also used to evaluate the quality of agreement between physician and patient assessment of well-being. The weighted kappa (0.2322, P=0.0002) indicates a significant level of agreement.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1991/190289
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author JF Reed
Linda A Faust
spellingShingle JF Reed
Linda A Faust
An Analysis of Crohn’s Disease Activity Indices from a Registry of Patients in Eastern Pennsylvania
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
author_facet JF Reed
Linda A Faust
author_sort JF Reed
title An Analysis of Crohn’s Disease Activity Indices from a Registry of Patients in Eastern Pennsylvania
title_short An Analysis of Crohn’s Disease Activity Indices from a Registry of Patients in Eastern Pennsylvania
title_full An Analysis of Crohn’s Disease Activity Indices from a Registry of Patients in Eastern Pennsylvania
title_fullStr An Analysis of Crohn’s Disease Activity Indices from a Registry of Patients in Eastern Pennsylvania
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of Crohn’s Disease Activity Indices from a Registry of Patients in Eastern Pennsylvania
title_sort analysis of crohn’s disease activity indices from a registry of patients in eastern pennsylvania
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
issn 0835-7900
publishDate 1991-01-01
description The objectives of this report were to compare Crohn’s disease patients’ assessment of disease activity and its effect on their well-being to their physician’s assessment of the disease activity and the patient’s well-being; and to use existing Crohn’s disease indices in comparing the severity of Crohn’s disease across various indices. The indices included in this study were the National Cooperative Crohn’s Disease Study index, the Harvey and Bradshaw Index, the Oxford Index, the Modified Organisation Mondiale de Gastroentérologie Index, the Cape Town Index, the Bristol Index, and the St Marks Index. The comparison of Crohn’s disease patient self-evaluation and physician evaluation of the patient indicates a significant agreement between patient and physician assessment of disease activity (Χ2 41.68, P=0.00001). Cohen’s weighted kappa, a chance-corrected coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, was also used to evaluate the quality of agreement between physician and patient assessment of well-being. The weighted kappa (0.2322, P=0.0002) indicates a significant level of agreement.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1991/190289
work_keys_str_mv AT jfreed ananalysisofcrohnsdiseaseactivityindicesfromaregistryofpatientsineasternpennsylvania
AT lindaafaust ananalysisofcrohnsdiseaseactivityindicesfromaregistryofpatientsineasternpennsylvania
AT jfreed analysisofcrohnsdiseaseactivityindicesfromaregistryofpatientsineasternpennsylvania
AT lindaafaust analysisofcrohnsdiseaseactivityindicesfromaregistryofpatientsineasternpennsylvania
_version_ 1725556044104466432