Strategic Use of Affiliative Vocalizations by Wild Female Baboons.

Although vocal production in non-human primates is highly constrained, individuals appear to have some control over whether to call or remain silent. We investigated how contextual factors affect the production of grunts given by wild female chacma baboons, Papio ursinus, during social interactions....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joan B Silk, Robert M Seyfarth, Dorothy L Cheney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5081171?pdf=render
id doaj-d93db5327fd74bf8a7df03b9f446d593
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d93db5327fd74bf8a7df03b9f446d5932020-11-25T01:01:40ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-011110e016397810.1371/journal.pone.0163978Strategic Use of Affiliative Vocalizations by Wild Female Baboons.Joan B SilkRobert M SeyfarthDorothy L CheneyAlthough vocal production in non-human primates is highly constrained, individuals appear to have some control over whether to call or remain silent. We investigated how contextual factors affect the production of grunts given by wild female chacma baboons, Papio ursinus, during social interactions. Females grunted as they approached other adult females 28% of the time. Supporting previous research, females were much more likely to grunt to mothers with young infants than to females without infants. Grunts also significantly increased the likelihood of affiliative interactions among all partners. Notably, however, grunts did not simply mirror existing social bonds. Instead, they appeared to perform a very different function: namely, to serve as signals of benign intent between partners whose relationship is not necessarily close or predictable. Females were less likely to grunt to their mothers or adult daughters-the individuals with whom they shared the closest and least aggressive bonds-than to other females. In contrast, patterns of grunting between sisters were similar to those between nonkin, perhaps reflecting sisters' more ambivalent relationships. Females grunted at higher rates to lower-ranking, than to higher-ranking, females, supporting the hypothesis that grunts do not simply signal the signaler's level of arousal or anxiety about receiving aggression, but instead function as signals of benign intent. Taken together, results suggest that the grunts given by female baboons serve to reduce uncertainty about the likely outcome of an interaction between partners whose relationship is not predictably affiliative. Despite their limited vocal repertoire, baboons appear to be skilled at modifying call production in different social contexts and for different audiences.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5081171?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joan B Silk
Robert M Seyfarth
Dorothy L Cheney
spellingShingle Joan B Silk
Robert M Seyfarth
Dorothy L Cheney
Strategic Use of Affiliative Vocalizations by Wild Female Baboons.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Joan B Silk
Robert M Seyfarth
Dorothy L Cheney
author_sort Joan B Silk
title Strategic Use of Affiliative Vocalizations by Wild Female Baboons.
title_short Strategic Use of Affiliative Vocalizations by Wild Female Baboons.
title_full Strategic Use of Affiliative Vocalizations by Wild Female Baboons.
title_fullStr Strategic Use of Affiliative Vocalizations by Wild Female Baboons.
title_full_unstemmed Strategic Use of Affiliative Vocalizations by Wild Female Baboons.
title_sort strategic use of affiliative vocalizations by wild female baboons.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Although vocal production in non-human primates is highly constrained, individuals appear to have some control over whether to call or remain silent. We investigated how contextual factors affect the production of grunts given by wild female chacma baboons, Papio ursinus, during social interactions. Females grunted as they approached other adult females 28% of the time. Supporting previous research, females were much more likely to grunt to mothers with young infants than to females without infants. Grunts also significantly increased the likelihood of affiliative interactions among all partners. Notably, however, grunts did not simply mirror existing social bonds. Instead, they appeared to perform a very different function: namely, to serve as signals of benign intent between partners whose relationship is not necessarily close or predictable. Females were less likely to grunt to their mothers or adult daughters-the individuals with whom they shared the closest and least aggressive bonds-than to other females. In contrast, patterns of grunting between sisters were similar to those between nonkin, perhaps reflecting sisters' more ambivalent relationships. Females grunted at higher rates to lower-ranking, than to higher-ranking, females, supporting the hypothesis that grunts do not simply signal the signaler's level of arousal or anxiety about receiving aggression, but instead function as signals of benign intent. Taken together, results suggest that the grunts given by female baboons serve to reduce uncertainty about the likely outcome of an interaction between partners whose relationship is not predictably affiliative. Despite their limited vocal repertoire, baboons appear to be skilled at modifying call production in different social contexts and for different audiences.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5081171?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT joanbsilk strategicuseofaffiliativevocalizationsbywildfemalebaboons
AT robertmseyfarth strategicuseofaffiliativevocalizationsbywildfemalebaboons
AT dorothylcheney strategicuseofaffiliativevocalizationsbywildfemalebaboons
_version_ 1725207961609961472