Going beyond "it depends:" the role of context in shaping participation in natural resource management

Public participation is increasingly advocated in natural resource management to meet a spectrum of instrumental to normative goals. However, the success of participation in achieving these goals is highly variable, depending on both societal and institutional contexts. Whether participation realise...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susan Baker, F. Stuart Chapin III
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2018-03-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss1/art20/
id doaj-d92e65889ba94e69af7f7416ecb9f84b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d92e65889ba94e69af7f7416ecb9f84b2020-11-24T22:10:45ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872018-03-012312010.5751/ES-09868-2301209868Going beyond "it depends:" the role of context in shaping participation in natural resource managementSusan Baker0F. Stuart Chapin III1Sustainable Places Research Institute and School of Social Sciences, Cardiff UniversityInstitute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska FairbanksPublic participation is increasingly advocated in natural resource management to meet a spectrum of instrumental to normative goals. However, the success of participation in achieving these goals is highly variable, depending on both societal and institutional contexts. Whether participation realises its benefits or succumbs to its pitfalls is shaped by dynamic interactions operating among three contextual dimensions: participatory rationales (instrumental to normative), institutional fit of different levels (types) of participation (information delivery to partnership to delegation), and social structures (such as cultural context, social capital, and power distribution). Some levels of participation may support the existing power hierarchy, others benefit organized stakeholder groups and special interests, and still others foster deliberative democratic outcomes. We argue that wise choice of levels of participation in particular contexts shapes the balance of participation's benefits and pitfalls.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss1/art20/deliberative democracyinequityinstitutional constraintsinstrumental valuesnormative valuesparticipationsocial structures
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Susan Baker
F. Stuart Chapin III
spellingShingle Susan Baker
F. Stuart Chapin III
Going beyond "it depends:" the role of context in shaping participation in natural resource management
Ecology and Society
deliberative democracy
inequity
institutional constraints
instrumental values
normative values
participation
social structures
author_facet Susan Baker
F. Stuart Chapin III
author_sort Susan Baker
title Going beyond "it depends:" the role of context in shaping participation in natural resource management
title_short Going beyond "it depends:" the role of context in shaping participation in natural resource management
title_full Going beyond "it depends:" the role of context in shaping participation in natural resource management
title_fullStr Going beyond "it depends:" the role of context in shaping participation in natural resource management
title_full_unstemmed Going beyond "it depends:" the role of context in shaping participation in natural resource management
title_sort going beyond "it depends:" the role of context in shaping participation in natural resource management
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Public participation is increasingly advocated in natural resource management to meet a spectrum of instrumental to normative goals. However, the success of participation in achieving these goals is highly variable, depending on both societal and institutional contexts. Whether participation realises its benefits or succumbs to its pitfalls is shaped by dynamic interactions operating among three contextual dimensions: participatory rationales (instrumental to normative), institutional fit of different levels (types) of participation (information delivery to partnership to delegation), and social structures (such as cultural context, social capital, and power distribution). Some levels of participation may support the existing power hierarchy, others benefit organized stakeholder groups and special interests, and still others foster deliberative democratic outcomes. We argue that wise choice of levels of participation in particular contexts shapes the balance of participation's benefits and pitfalls.
topic deliberative democracy
inequity
institutional constraints
instrumental values
normative values
participation
social structures
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss1/art20/
work_keys_str_mv AT susanbaker goingbeyonditdependstheroleofcontextinshapingparticipationinnaturalresourcemanagement
AT fstuartchapiniii goingbeyonditdependstheroleofcontextinshapingparticipationinnaturalresourcemanagement
_version_ 1716584853879652352