Experiences of responsible gambling tools among non-problem gamblers: A survey of active customers of an online gambling platform

Introduction: Responsible gambling (RG) tools, aiming at helping gamblers to avoid gambling-related harms, are common in online gambling platforms. Gambling industry, policy makers, and researchers have warned that RG tools can potentially disturb recreational gamblers, channeling them to less prote...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ekaterina Ivanova, Jonas Rafi, Philip Lindner, Per Carlbring
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-06-01
Series:Addictive Behaviors Reports
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853218301731
id doaj-d927a5bb73264aa9abd88b07b7ecd2da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d927a5bb73264aa9abd88b07b7ecd2da2020-11-25T01:37:17ZengElsevierAddictive Behaviors Reports2352-85322019-06-019Experiences of responsible gambling tools among non-problem gamblers: A survey of active customers of an online gambling platformEkaterina Ivanova0Jonas Rafi1Philip Lindner2Per Carlbring3Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; Corresponding author.Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; Centre for Dependency Disorders, Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Friskvårdsvägen 4, floor 2, S:t Göran, 112 81 Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, DenmarkIntroduction: Responsible gambling (RG) tools, aiming at helping gamblers to avoid gambling-related harms, are common in online gambling platforms. Gambling industry, policy makers, and researchers have warned that RG tools can potentially disturb recreational gamblers, channeling them to less protective operators. No evidence exists to support these concerns, and they can hinder the development of effective RG tools. The current study aimed to investigate the recreational gamblers' experiences of RG tools. Methods: A total of 10,200 active customers of an online gambling service were invited to complete an online survey and rate their overall reactions, attitudes, disturbance and irritation towards RG tools, as well as their inclination to abandon a gambling service due to overexposure to RG tools. N = 1223 surveys were completed. Results: Non-problem gamblers had positive experiences of RG tools. Moderate-risk gamblers had more positive overall reaction and less irritation to previous experiences of RG tools compared to non-problem gamblers. Problem gamblers had least positive attitudes, most disturbance and most irritation towards RG pictures. Non-problem gamblers had lowest rates of having abandoned a service because of perceived overexposure to RG tools (5.2% compared to 25.9% of problem gamblers), with a significant between-group difference (OR [95% CI] = 7.17 [3.61–14.23], p < .001). Conclusions: Non-problem gamblers were not particularly disturbed by RG tools and were not at risk of abandoning online gambling services because of overexposure to RG tools. The study found no grounds for limiting the design and implementation of RG tools due to fears of disturbing recreational gamblers. Keywords: Recreational gamblers, Problem gambling, Responsible gambling, Attitudes, Online gambling, Consumer protectionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853218301731
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ekaterina Ivanova
Jonas Rafi
Philip Lindner
Per Carlbring
spellingShingle Ekaterina Ivanova
Jonas Rafi
Philip Lindner
Per Carlbring
Experiences of responsible gambling tools among non-problem gamblers: A survey of active customers of an online gambling platform
Addictive Behaviors Reports
author_facet Ekaterina Ivanova
Jonas Rafi
Philip Lindner
Per Carlbring
author_sort Ekaterina Ivanova
title Experiences of responsible gambling tools among non-problem gamblers: A survey of active customers of an online gambling platform
title_short Experiences of responsible gambling tools among non-problem gamblers: A survey of active customers of an online gambling platform
title_full Experiences of responsible gambling tools among non-problem gamblers: A survey of active customers of an online gambling platform
title_fullStr Experiences of responsible gambling tools among non-problem gamblers: A survey of active customers of an online gambling platform
title_full_unstemmed Experiences of responsible gambling tools among non-problem gamblers: A survey of active customers of an online gambling platform
title_sort experiences of responsible gambling tools among non-problem gamblers: a survey of active customers of an online gambling platform
publisher Elsevier
series Addictive Behaviors Reports
issn 2352-8532
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Introduction: Responsible gambling (RG) tools, aiming at helping gamblers to avoid gambling-related harms, are common in online gambling platforms. Gambling industry, policy makers, and researchers have warned that RG tools can potentially disturb recreational gamblers, channeling them to less protective operators. No evidence exists to support these concerns, and they can hinder the development of effective RG tools. The current study aimed to investigate the recreational gamblers' experiences of RG tools. Methods: A total of 10,200 active customers of an online gambling service were invited to complete an online survey and rate their overall reactions, attitudes, disturbance and irritation towards RG tools, as well as their inclination to abandon a gambling service due to overexposure to RG tools. N = 1223 surveys were completed. Results: Non-problem gamblers had positive experiences of RG tools. Moderate-risk gamblers had more positive overall reaction and less irritation to previous experiences of RG tools compared to non-problem gamblers. Problem gamblers had least positive attitudes, most disturbance and most irritation towards RG pictures. Non-problem gamblers had lowest rates of having abandoned a service because of perceived overexposure to RG tools (5.2% compared to 25.9% of problem gamblers), with a significant between-group difference (OR [95% CI] = 7.17 [3.61–14.23], p < .001). Conclusions: Non-problem gamblers were not particularly disturbed by RG tools and were not at risk of abandoning online gambling services because of overexposure to RG tools. The study found no grounds for limiting the design and implementation of RG tools due to fears of disturbing recreational gamblers. Keywords: Recreational gamblers, Problem gambling, Responsible gambling, Attitudes, Online gambling, Consumer protection
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853218301731
work_keys_str_mv AT ekaterinaivanova experiencesofresponsiblegamblingtoolsamongnonproblemgamblersasurveyofactivecustomersofanonlinegamblingplatform
AT jonasrafi experiencesofresponsiblegamblingtoolsamongnonproblemgamblersasurveyofactivecustomersofanonlinegamblingplatform
AT philiplindner experiencesofresponsiblegamblingtoolsamongnonproblemgamblersasurveyofactivecustomersofanonlinegamblingplatform
AT percarlbring experiencesofresponsiblegamblingtoolsamongnonproblemgamblersasurveyofactivecustomersofanonlinegamblingplatform
_version_ 1725058533520572416