Land Surface Temperature Differences within Local Climate Zones, Based on Two Central European Cities

The main factors influencing the spatiotemporal variability of urban climate are quite widely recognized, including, for example, the thermal properties of materials used for surfaces and buildings, the mass, height and layout of the buildings themselves and patterns of land use. However, the roles...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jan Geletič, Michal Lehnert, Petr Dobrovolný
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-09-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/10/788
id doaj-d914881e0527465ca9f1d02a1f6c7a77
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d914881e0527465ca9f1d02a1f6c7a772020-11-25T01:05:13ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922016-09-0181078810.3390/rs8100788rs8100788Land Surface Temperature Differences within Local Climate Zones, Based on Two Central European CitiesJan Geletič0Michal Lehnert1Petr Dobrovolný2Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University Brno, Kotlářská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, 17. listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech RepublicDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University Brno, Kotlářská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech RepublicThe main factors influencing the spatiotemporal variability of urban climate are quite widely recognized, including, for example, the thermal properties of materials used for surfaces and buildings, the mass, height and layout of the buildings themselves and patterns of land use. However, the roles played by particular factors vary from city to city with respect to differences in geographical location, overall size, number of inhabitants and more. In urban climatology, the concept of “local climate zones” (LCZs) has emerged over the past decade to address this heterogeneity. In this contribution, a new GIS-based method is used for LCZ delimitation in Prague and Brno, the two largest cities in the Czech Republic, while land surface temperatures (LSTs) derived from LANDSAT and ASTER satellite data are employed for exploring the extent to which LCZ classes discriminate with respect to LSTs. It has been suggested that correctly-delineated LCZs should demonstrate the features typical of LST variability, and thus, typical surface temperatures should differ significantly among most LCZs. Zones representing heavy industry (LCZ 10), dense low-rise buildings (LCZ 3) and compact mid-rise buildings (LCZ 2) were identified as the warmest in both cities, while bodies of water (LCZ G) and densely-forested areas (LCZ A) made up the coolest zones. ANOVA and subsequent multiple comparison tests demonstrated that significant temperature differences between the various LCZs prevail. The results of testing were similar for both study areas (89.3% and 91.7% significant LST differences for Brno and Prague, respectively). LSTs computed from LANDSAT differentiated better between LCZs, compared with ASTER. LCZ 8 (large low-rise buildings), LCZ 10 (heavy industry) and LCZ D (low plants) are well-differentiated zones in terms of their surface temperatures. In contrast, LCZ 2 (compact mid-rise), LCZ 4 (open high-rise) and LCZ 9 (sparsely built-up) are less distinguishable in both areas analyzed. Factors such as seasonality and thermal anisotropy remain a challenge for future research into LST differences.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/10/788land surface temperaturelocal climate zonesASTERLANDSATanalysis of variancePragueBrnoCzech Republic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jan Geletič
Michal Lehnert
Petr Dobrovolný
spellingShingle Jan Geletič
Michal Lehnert
Petr Dobrovolný
Land Surface Temperature Differences within Local Climate Zones, Based on Two Central European Cities
Remote Sensing
land surface temperature
local climate zones
ASTER
LANDSAT
analysis of variance
Prague
Brno
Czech Republic
author_facet Jan Geletič
Michal Lehnert
Petr Dobrovolný
author_sort Jan Geletič
title Land Surface Temperature Differences within Local Climate Zones, Based on Two Central European Cities
title_short Land Surface Temperature Differences within Local Climate Zones, Based on Two Central European Cities
title_full Land Surface Temperature Differences within Local Climate Zones, Based on Two Central European Cities
title_fullStr Land Surface Temperature Differences within Local Climate Zones, Based on Two Central European Cities
title_full_unstemmed Land Surface Temperature Differences within Local Climate Zones, Based on Two Central European Cities
title_sort land surface temperature differences within local climate zones, based on two central european cities
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2016-09-01
description The main factors influencing the spatiotemporal variability of urban climate are quite widely recognized, including, for example, the thermal properties of materials used for surfaces and buildings, the mass, height and layout of the buildings themselves and patterns of land use. However, the roles played by particular factors vary from city to city with respect to differences in geographical location, overall size, number of inhabitants and more. In urban climatology, the concept of “local climate zones” (LCZs) has emerged over the past decade to address this heterogeneity. In this contribution, a new GIS-based method is used for LCZ delimitation in Prague and Brno, the two largest cities in the Czech Republic, while land surface temperatures (LSTs) derived from LANDSAT and ASTER satellite data are employed for exploring the extent to which LCZ classes discriminate with respect to LSTs. It has been suggested that correctly-delineated LCZs should demonstrate the features typical of LST variability, and thus, typical surface temperatures should differ significantly among most LCZs. Zones representing heavy industry (LCZ 10), dense low-rise buildings (LCZ 3) and compact mid-rise buildings (LCZ 2) were identified as the warmest in both cities, while bodies of water (LCZ G) and densely-forested areas (LCZ A) made up the coolest zones. ANOVA and subsequent multiple comparison tests demonstrated that significant temperature differences between the various LCZs prevail. The results of testing were similar for both study areas (89.3% and 91.7% significant LST differences for Brno and Prague, respectively). LSTs computed from LANDSAT differentiated better between LCZs, compared with ASTER. LCZ 8 (large low-rise buildings), LCZ 10 (heavy industry) and LCZ D (low plants) are well-differentiated zones in terms of their surface temperatures. In contrast, LCZ 2 (compact mid-rise), LCZ 4 (open high-rise) and LCZ 9 (sparsely built-up) are less distinguishable in both areas analyzed. Factors such as seasonality and thermal anisotropy remain a challenge for future research into LST differences.
topic land surface temperature
local climate zones
ASTER
LANDSAT
analysis of variance
Prague
Brno
Czech Republic
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/10/788
work_keys_str_mv AT jangeletic landsurfacetemperaturedifferenceswithinlocalclimatezonesbasedontwocentraleuropeancities
AT michallehnert landsurfacetemperaturedifferenceswithinlocalclimatezonesbasedontwocentraleuropeancities
AT petrdobrovolny landsurfacetemperaturedifferenceswithinlocalclimatezonesbasedontwocentraleuropeancities
_version_ 1725195499562074112