A comparison of methods for calculating general practice level socioeconomic deprivation
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A measure of the socioeconomic deprivation experienced by the registered patient population of a general practice is of interest because it can be used to explore the association between deprivation and a wide range of other variable...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2006-07-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Health Geographics |
Online Access: | http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/5/1/29 |
id |
doaj-d90f5111d888466380fff6da2d34369a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d90f5111d888466380fff6da2d34369a2020-11-25T00:51:32ZengBMCInternational Journal of Health Geographics1476-072X2006-07-01512910.1186/1476-072X-5-29A comparison of methods for calculating general practice level socioeconomic deprivationPearson TimMaheswaran RaviStrong Mark<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A measure of the socioeconomic deprivation experienced by the registered patient population of a general practice is of interest because it can be used to explore the association between deprivation and a wide range of other variables measured at practice level. If patient level geographical data are available a population weighted mean area-based deprivation score can be calculated for each practice. In the absence of these data, an area-based deprivation score linked to the practice postcode can be used as an estimate of the socioeconomic deprivation of the practice population. This study explores the correlation between Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004 (IMD) scores linked to general practice postcodes (main surgery address alone and main surgery plus any branch surgeries), practice population weighted mean IMD scores, and practice level mortality (aged 1 to 75 years, all causes) for 38 practices in Rotherham UK.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Population weighted deprivation scores correlated with practice postcode based scores (main surgery only, Pearson r = 0.74, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.85; main plus branch surgeries, r = 0.79, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.89). All cause mortality aged 1 to 75 correlated with deprivation (main surgery postcode based measure, r = 0.50, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.71; main plus branch surgery based score, r = 0.55, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.74); population weighted measure, r = 0.66, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.81).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Practice postcode linked IMD scores provide a valid proxy for a population weighted measure in the absence of patient level data. However, by using them, the strength of association between mortality and deprivation may be underestimated.</p> http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/5/1/29 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pearson Tim Maheswaran Ravi Strong Mark |
spellingShingle |
Pearson Tim Maheswaran Ravi Strong Mark A comparison of methods for calculating general practice level socioeconomic deprivation International Journal of Health Geographics |
author_facet |
Pearson Tim Maheswaran Ravi Strong Mark |
author_sort |
Pearson Tim |
title |
A comparison of methods for calculating general practice level socioeconomic deprivation |
title_short |
A comparison of methods for calculating general practice level socioeconomic deprivation |
title_full |
A comparison of methods for calculating general practice level socioeconomic deprivation |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of methods for calculating general practice level socioeconomic deprivation |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of methods for calculating general practice level socioeconomic deprivation |
title_sort |
comparison of methods for calculating general practice level socioeconomic deprivation |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
International Journal of Health Geographics |
issn |
1476-072X |
publishDate |
2006-07-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A measure of the socioeconomic deprivation experienced by the registered patient population of a general practice is of interest because it can be used to explore the association between deprivation and a wide range of other variables measured at practice level. If patient level geographical data are available a population weighted mean area-based deprivation score can be calculated for each practice. In the absence of these data, an area-based deprivation score linked to the practice postcode can be used as an estimate of the socioeconomic deprivation of the practice population. This study explores the correlation between Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004 (IMD) scores linked to general practice postcodes (main surgery address alone and main surgery plus any branch surgeries), practice population weighted mean IMD scores, and practice level mortality (aged 1 to 75 years, all causes) for 38 practices in Rotherham UK.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Population weighted deprivation scores correlated with practice postcode based scores (main surgery only, Pearson r = 0.74, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.85; main plus branch surgeries, r = 0.79, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.89). All cause mortality aged 1 to 75 correlated with deprivation (main surgery postcode based measure, r = 0.50, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.71; main plus branch surgery based score, r = 0.55, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.74); population weighted measure, r = 0.66, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.81).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Practice postcode linked IMD scores provide a valid proxy for a population weighted measure in the absence of patient level data. However, by using them, the strength of association between mortality and deprivation may be underestimated.</p> |
url |
http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/5/1/29 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pearsontim acomparisonofmethodsforcalculatinggeneralpracticelevelsocioeconomicdeprivation AT maheswaranravi acomparisonofmethodsforcalculatinggeneralpracticelevelsocioeconomicdeprivation AT strongmark acomparisonofmethodsforcalculatinggeneralpracticelevelsocioeconomicdeprivation AT pearsontim comparisonofmethodsforcalculatinggeneralpracticelevelsocioeconomicdeprivation AT maheswaranravi comparisonofmethodsforcalculatinggeneralpracticelevelsocioeconomicdeprivation AT strongmark comparisonofmethodsforcalculatinggeneralpracticelevelsocioeconomicdeprivation |
_version_ |
1725245294213332992 |