Place, Capital Flows and Property Regimes: The Elites’ Former Houses in Beijing’s South Luogu Lane

Place is seen as a process whereby social and cultural forms are reproduced. This process is closely linked to capital flows, which are, in turn, shaped by changing property regimes. However, relatively little attention has been paid to the relationship between property regimes, capital flows and p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhifen Cheng, Shangyi Zhou, Stephen Young
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-12-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/1/398
id doaj-d8fde4f2801046af9fdc217c584d6ac8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d8fde4f2801046af9fdc217c584d6ac82020-11-24T21:25:06ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502014-12-017139842110.3390/su7010398su7010398Place, Capital Flows and Property Regimes: The Elites’ Former Houses in Beijing’s South Luogu LaneZhifen Cheng0Shangyi Zhou1Stephen Young2School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, ChinaSchool of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, ChinaDepartment of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 550 North Park Street, Madison, WI 53706, USAPlace is seen as a process whereby social and cultural forms are reproduced. This process is closely linked to capital flows, which are, in turn, shaped by changing property regimes. However, relatively little attention has been paid to the relationship between property regimes, capital flows and place-making. The goal of this paper is to highlight the role of changing property regimes in the production of place. Our research area is South Luogu Lane (SLL) in Central Beijing. We take elites’ former houses in SLL as the main unit of analysis in this study. From studying this changing landscape, we draw four main conclusions. First, the location of SSL was critical in enabling it to emerge as a high-status residential community near the imperial city. Second, historical patterns of capital accumulation influenced subsequent rounds of private investment into particular areas of SLL. Third, as laws relating to the ownership of land and real estate changed fundamentally in the early 1950s and again in the 1980s, the target and intensity of capital flows into housing in SLL changed too. Fourth, these changes in capital flow are linked to ongoing changes in the place image of SLL.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/1/398place-makingcapital flowsproperty regimeselites’ former housesBeijing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhifen Cheng
Shangyi Zhou
Stephen Young
spellingShingle Zhifen Cheng
Shangyi Zhou
Stephen Young
Place, Capital Flows and Property Regimes: The Elites’ Former Houses in Beijing’s South Luogu Lane
Sustainability
place-making
capital flows
property regimes
elites’ former houses
Beijing
author_facet Zhifen Cheng
Shangyi Zhou
Stephen Young
author_sort Zhifen Cheng
title Place, Capital Flows and Property Regimes: The Elites’ Former Houses in Beijing’s South Luogu Lane
title_short Place, Capital Flows and Property Regimes: The Elites’ Former Houses in Beijing’s South Luogu Lane
title_full Place, Capital Flows and Property Regimes: The Elites’ Former Houses in Beijing’s South Luogu Lane
title_fullStr Place, Capital Flows and Property Regimes: The Elites’ Former Houses in Beijing’s South Luogu Lane
title_full_unstemmed Place, Capital Flows and Property Regimes: The Elites’ Former Houses in Beijing’s South Luogu Lane
title_sort place, capital flows and property regimes: the elites’ former houses in beijing’s south luogu lane
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2014-12-01
description Place is seen as a process whereby social and cultural forms are reproduced. This process is closely linked to capital flows, which are, in turn, shaped by changing property regimes. However, relatively little attention has been paid to the relationship between property regimes, capital flows and place-making. The goal of this paper is to highlight the role of changing property regimes in the production of place. Our research area is South Luogu Lane (SLL) in Central Beijing. We take elites’ former houses in SLL as the main unit of analysis in this study. From studying this changing landscape, we draw four main conclusions. First, the location of SSL was critical in enabling it to emerge as a high-status residential community near the imperial city. Second, historical patterns of capital accumulation influenced subsequent rounds of private investment into particular areas of SLL. Third, as laws relating to the ownership of land and real estate changed fundamentally in the early 1950s and again in the 1980s, the target and intensity of capital flows into housing in SLL changed too. Fourth, these changes in capital flow are linked to ongoing changes in the place image of SLL.
topic place-making
capital flows
property regimes
elites’ former houses
Beijing
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/1/398
work_keys_str_mv AT zhifencheng placecapitalflowsandpropertyregimestheelitesformerhousesinbeijingssouthluogulane
AT shangyizhou placecapitalflowsandpropertyregimestheelitesformerhousesinbeijingssouthluogulane
AT stephenyoung placecapitalflowsandpropertyregimestheelitesformerhousesinbeijingssouthluogulane
_version_ 1725984928416399360