Evaluation of European air quality modelled by CAMx including the volatility basis set scheme

Four periods of EMEP (European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme) intensive measurement campaigns (June 2006, January 2007, September–October 2008 and February–March 2009) were modelled using the regional air quality model CAMx with VBS (volatility basis set) approach for the first time in Euro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Ciarelli, S. Aksoyoglu, M. Crippa, J.-L. Jimenez, E. Nemitz, K. Sellegri, M. Äijälä, S. Carbone, C. Mohr, C. O'Dowd, L. Poulain, U. Baltensperger, A. S. H. Prévôt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016-08-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/10313/2016/acp-16-10313-2016.pdf
id doaj-d8f783461b8a42c5860a783df712e836
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G. Ciarelli
S. Aksoyoglu
M. Crippa
M. Crippa
J.-L. Jimenez
J.-L. Jimenez
E. Nemitz
K. Sellegri
M. Äijälä
S. Carbone
S. Carbone
C. Mohr
C. O'Dowd
L. Poulain
U. Baltensperger
A. S. H. Prévôt
spellingShingle G. Ciarelli
S. Aksoyoglu
M. Crippa
M. Crippa
J.-L. Jimenez
J.-L. Jimenez
E. Nemitz
K. Sellegri
M. Äijälä
S. Carbone
S. Carbone
C. Mohr
C. O'Dowd
L. Poulain
U. Baltensperger
A. S. H. Prévôt
Evaluation of European air quality modelled by CAMx including the volatility basis set scheme
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet G. Ciarelli
S. Aksoyoglu
M. Crippa
M. Crippa
J.-L. Jimenez
J.-L. Jimenez
E. Nemitz
K. Sellegri
M. Äijälä
S. Carbone
S. Carbone
C. Mohr
C. O'Dowd
L. Poulain
U. Baltensperger
A. S. H. Prévôt
author_sort G. Ciarelli
title Evaluation of European air quality modelled by CAMx including the volatility basis set scheme
title_short Evaluation of European air quality modelled by CAMx including the volatility basis set scheme
title_full Evaluation of European air quality modelled by CAMx including the volatility basis set scheme
title_fullStr Evaluation of European air quality modelled by CAMx including the volatility basis set scheme
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of European air quality modelled by CAMx including the volatility basis set scheme
title_sort evaluation of european air quality modelled by camx including the volatility basis set scheme
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2016-08-01
description Four periods of EMEP (European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme) intensive measurement campaigns (June 2006, January 2007, September–October 2008 and February–March 2009) were modelled using the regional air quality model CAMx with VBS (volatility basis set) approach for the first time in Europe within the framework of the EURODELTA-III model intercomparison exercise. More detailed analysis and sensitivity tests were performed for the period of February–March 2009 and June 2006 to investigate the uncertainties in emissions as well as to improve the modelling of organic aerosol (OA). Model performance for selected gas phase species and PM<sub>2.5</sub> was evaluated using the European air quality database AirBase. Sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) and ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) were found to be overestimated for all the four periods, with O<sub>3</sub> having the largest mean bias during June 2006 and January–February 2007 periods (8.9 pbb and 12.3 ppb mean biases respectively). In contrast, nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) and carbon monoxide (CO) were found to be underestimated for all the four periods. CAMx reproduced both total concentrations and monthly variations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> for all the four periods with average biases ranging from −2.1 to 1.0 µg m<sup>−3</sup>. Comparisons with AMS (aerosol mass spectrometer) measurements at different sites in Europe during February–March 2009 showed that in general the model overpredicts the inorganic aerosol fraction and underpredicts the organic one, such that the good agreement for PM<sub>2.5</sub> is partly due to compensation of errors. The effect of the choice of VBS scheme on OA was investigated as well. Two sensitivity tests with volatility distributions based on previous chamber and ambient measurements data were performed. For February–March 2009 the chamber case reduced the total OA concentrations by about 42 % on average. In contrast, a test based on ambient measurement data increased OA concentrations by about 42 % for the same period bringing model and observations into better agreement. Comparison with the AMS data at the rural Swiss site Payerne in June 2006 shows no significant improvement in modelled OA concentration. Further sensitivity tests with increased biogenic and anthropogenic emissions suggest that OA in Payerne was affected by changes in emissions from residential heating during the February–March 2009 whereas it was more sensitive to biogenic precursors in June 2006.
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/10313/2016/acp-16-10313-2016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gciarelli evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
AT saksoyoglu evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
AT mcrippa evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
AT mcrippa evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
AT jljimenez evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
AT jljimenez evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
AT enemitz evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
AT ksellegri evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
AT maijala evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
AT scarbone evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
AT scarbone evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
AT cmohr evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
AT codowd evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
AT lpoulain evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
AT ubaltensperger evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
AT ashprevot evaluationofeuropeanairqualitymodelledbycamxincludingthevolatilitybasissetscheme
_version_ 1725540810007511040
spelling doaj-d8f783461b8a42c5860a783df712e8362020-11-24T23:30:41ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242016-08-0116103131033210.5194/acp-16-10313-2016Evaluation of European air quality modelled by CAMx including the volatility basis set schemeG. Ciarelli0S. Aksoyoglu1M. Crippa2M. Crippa3J.-L. Jimenez4J.-L. Jimenez5E. Nemitz6K. Sellegri7M. Äijälä8S. Carbone9S. Carbone10C. Mohr11C. O'Dowd12L. Poulain13U. Baltensperger14A. S. H. Prévôt15Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, 5232 Villigen PSI, SwitzerlandPaul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, 5232 Villigen PSI, SwitzerlandPaul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerlandnow at: European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES), Via Fermi, 2749, 21027 Ispra, ItalyCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USADepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USACentre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0QB, UKLaboratoire de Météorologie Physique CNRS UMR6016, Observatoire de Physique du Globe de Clermont-Ferrand, Université Blaise Pascal, 63171 Aubière, FranceUniversity of Helsinki, Department of Physics, Helsinki, FinlandAtmospheric Composition Research, Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, 00101 Helsinki, Finlandnow at: Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, Rua do Matão Travessa R, 187, 05508-090 São Paulo, S.P., BrazilKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, GermanySchool of Physics and Centre for Climate & Air Pollution Studies, Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, IrelandLeibniz-Institute for Tropospheric Research (TROPOS), Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, GermanyPaul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, 5232 Villigen PSI, SwitzerlandPaul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, 5232 Villigen PSI, SwitzerlandFour periods of EMEP (European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme) intensive measurement campaigns (June 2006, January 2007, September–October 2008 and February–March 2009) were modelled using the regional air quality model CAMx with VBS (volatility basis set) approach for the first time in Europe within the framework of the EURODELTA-III model intercomparison exercise. More detailed analysis and sensitivity tests were performed for the period of February–March 2009 and June 2006 to investigate the uncertainties in emissions as well as to improve the modelling of organic aerosol (OA). Model performance for selected gas phase species and PM<sub>2.5</sub> was evaluated using the European air quality database AirBase. Sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) and ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) were found to be overestimated for all the four periods, with O<sub>3</sub> having the largest mean bias during June 2006 and January–February 2007 periods (8.9 pbb and 12.3 ppb mean biases respectively). In contrast, nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) and carbon monoxide (CO) were found to be underestimated for all the four periods. CAMx reproduced both total concentrations and monthly variations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> for all the four periods with average biases ranging from −2.1 to 1.0 µg m<sup>−3</sup>. Comparisons with AMS (aerosol mass spectrometer) measurements at different sites in Europe during February–March 2009 showed that in general the model overpredicts the inorganic aerosol fraction and underpredicts the organic one, such that the good agreement for PM<sub>2.5</sub> is partly due to compensation of errors. The effect of the choice of VBS scheme on OA was investigated as well. Two sensitivity tests with volatility distributions based on previous chamber and ambient measurements data were performed. For February–March 2009 the chamber case reduced the total OA concentrations by about 42 % on average. In contrast, a test based on ambient measurement data increased OA concentrations by about 42 % for the same period bringing model and observations into better agreement. Comparison with the AMS data at the rural Swiss site Payerne in June 2006 shows no significant improvement in modelled OA concentration. Further sensitivity tests with increased biogenic and anthropogenic emissions suggest that OA in Payerne was affected by changes in emissions from residential heating during the February–March 2009 whereas it was more sensitive to biogenic precursors in June 2006.https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/10313/2016/acp-16-10313-2016.pdf