Identification and Assessment of Human Errors in Car Driving Using Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis Method

Introduction: Road accidents are among the major problems of road transportation in Iran. There are four factors involved in road accidents, including human, road, vehicle, and environment. Among these, human (driver) error has an important role in 70-90% of the accidents. Therefore, the present stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zahra Najafi, Shirazeh Arghami
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Hamadan University of Medical Sciences 2018-11-01
Series:Muhandisī-i bihdāsht-i ḥirfah/ī
Subjects:
Online Access:http://johe.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-460-en.pdf
id doaj-d8f47f0b70c843fc9e7de43d2ea50185
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d8f47f0b70c843fc9e7de43d2ea501852020-11-25T01:07:40ZfasHamadan University of Medical SciencesMuhandisī-i bihdāsht-i ḥirfah/ī2383-33782383-33782018-11-0153637510.21859/johe.5.3.63Identification and Assessment of Human Errors in Car Driving Using Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis MethodZahra Najafi0Shirazeh Arghami1MSc, Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Public Health, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, IranAssociate Professor, Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Public Health, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, IranIntroduction: Road accidents are among the major problems of road transportation in Iran. There are four factors involved in road accidents, including human, road, vehicle, and environment. Among these, human (driver) error has an important role in 70-90% of the accidents. Therefore, the present study was aimed at identifying and examining driver errors using the Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis Method. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional design was used to examine a specific scenario involving driving tasks. First, using the Hierarchical task analysis, the driving tasks for the scenario were analyzed. Then, using the primary and broad CREAM techniques, possible driver controls and cognitive errors were determined for the tasks. Results: Analysis of the scenario using the primary CREAM technique revealed nine diver tasks, including wearing a seat-belt, controlling the indicators, acceleration changing, direction changing, adjusting the distance, stopping the car, turning off the car, unbuckling the seat belt, and the light type of tactical control. Then, using the broad CREAM technique, the execution (71.87%), observation (18.75), and Interpretation (9.38%) errors were determined. Conclusion: Using the primary technique, four cases of performance-reducing conditions were identified. In General, according to the broad CREAM technique, 32 driver errors were identified. The most common cognitive errors included execution and observation errors. It can be concluded that based on the proposed controls, the risk of human error can be reduced for the analyzed subtasks.http://johe.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-460-en.pdfCREAM TechniqueDriverHuman ErrorPerformance ReliabilityRoad Traffic Safety
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zahra Najafi
Shirazeh Arghami
spellingShingle Zahra Najafi
Shirazeh Arghami
Identification and Assessment of Human Errors in Car Driving Using Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis Method
Muhandisī-i bihdāsht-i ḥirfah/ī
CREAM Technique
Driver
Human Error
Performance Reliability
Road Traffic Safety
author_facet Zahra Najafi
Shirazeh Arghami
author_sort Zahra Najafi
title Identification and Assessment of Human Errors in Car Driving Using Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis Method
title_short Identification and Assessment of Human Errors in Car Driving Using Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis Method
title_full Identification and Assessment of Human Errors in Car Driving Using Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis Method
title_fullStr Identification and Assessment of Human Errors in Car Driving Using Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis Method
title_full_unstemmed Identification and Assessment of Human Errors in Car Driving Using Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis Method
title_sort identification and assessment of human errors in car driving using cognitive reliability error analysis method
publisher Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
series Muhandisī-i bihdāsht-i ḥirfah/ī
issn 2383-3378
2383-3378
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Introduction: Road accidents are among the major problems of road transportation in Iran. There are four factors involved in road accidents, including human, road, vehicle, and environment. Among these, human (driver) error has an important role in 70-90% of the accidents. Therefore, the present study was aimed at identifying and examining driver errors using the Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis Method. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional design was used to examine a specific scenario involving driving tasks. First, using the Hierarchical task analysis, the driving tasks for the scenario were analyzed. Then, using the primary and broad CREAM techniques, possible driver controls and cognitive errors were determined for the tasks. Results: Analysis of the scenario using the primary CREAM technique revealed nine diver tasks, including wearing a seat-belt, controlling the indicators, acceleration changing, direction changing, adjusting the distance, stopping the car, turning off the car, unbuckling the seat belt, and the light type of tactical control. Then, using the broad CREAM technique, the execution (71.87%), observation (18.75), and Interpretation (9.38%) errors were determined. Conclusion: Using the primary technique, four cases of performance-reducing conditions were identified. In General, according to the broad CREAM technique, 32 driver errors were identified. The most common cognitive errors included execution and observation errors. It can be concluded that based on the proposed controls, the risk of human error can be reduced for the analyzed subtasks.
topic CREAM Technique
Driver
Human Error
Performance Reliability
Road Traffic Safety
url http://johe.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-460-en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zahranajafi identificationandassessmentofhumanerrorsincardrivingusingcognitivereliabilityerroranalysismethod
AT shirazeharghami identificationandassessmentofhumanerrorsincardrivingusingcognitivereliabilityerroranalysismethod
_version_ 1725186045759193088