Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background The role of somatosensory feedback in motor performance has been warranted in the literature. Although sensorimotor deficits are common after stroke, current rehabilitation approaches primarily focus on restoring upper limb motor ability. Evidence for integrative sensorimotor reh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nele De Bruyn, Bea Essers, Liselot Thijs, Annick Van Gils, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, Sarah Meyer, Kaat Alaerts, Geert Verheyden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-04-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2609-4
id doaj-d8f2641a73d047dd8cd30e6e6e483e82
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d8f2641a73d047dd8cd30e6e6e483e822020-11-24T23:34:47ZengBMCTrials1745-62152018-04-0119111010.1186/s13063-018-2609-4Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trialNele De Bruyn0Bea Essers1Liselot Thijs2Annick Van Gils3Lisa Tedesco Triccas4Sarah Meyer5Kaat Alaerts6Geert Verheyden7KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation SciencesKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation SciencesKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation SciencesKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation SciencesKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation SciencesKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation SciencesKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation SciencesKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation SciencesAbstract Background The role of somatosensory feedback in motor performance has been warranted in the literature. Although sensorimotor deficits are common after stroke, current rehabilitation approaches primarily focus on restoring upper limb motor ability. Evidence for integrative sensorimotor rehabilitation approaches is scarce, as is knowledge about neural correlates of somatosensory impairments after stroke and the effect of rehabilitation on brain connectivity level. Therefore, we aim to investigate changes in sensorimotor function and brain connectivity following a sensorimotor therapy program compared to an attention-matched motor therapy program for the upper limb after stroke. Methods An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Sixty inpatient rehabilitation patients up to eight weeks after stroke will be included. Patients will be randomized to either an experimental group receiving sensorimotor therapy or a control group receiving attention-matched motor therapy for the upper limb, with both groups receiving conventional therapy. Thus, all patients will receive extra therapy, a total of 16 1-h sessions over four weeks. Patients will be assessed at baseline, after four weeks of training, and after four weeks of follow-up. Primary outcome measure is the Action Research Arm Test. Secondary outcome measures will consist of somatosensory, motor and cognitive assessments, and a standardized resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol. Discussion The integration of sensory and motor rehabilitation into one therapy model might provide the added value of this therapy to improve sensorimotor performance post stroke. Insight in the behavioral and brain connectivity changes post therapy will lead to a better understanding of working mechanisms of therapy and will provide new knowledge for patient-tailored therapy approaches. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03236376. Registered on 8 August 2017.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2609-4StrokeUpper limbSensorimotor functionRandomized controlled trialFunctional connectivity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nele De Bruyn
Bea Essers
Liselot Thijs
Annick Van Gils
Lisa Tedesco Triccas
Sarah Meyer
Kaat Alaerts
Geert Verheyden
spellingShingle Nele De Bruyn
Bea Essers
Liselot Thijs
Annick Van Gils
Lisa Tedesco Triccas
Sarah Meyer
Kaat Alaerts
Geert Verheyden
Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial
Trials
Stroke
Upper limb
Sensorimotor function
Randomized controlled trial
Functional connectivity
author_facet Nele De Bruyn
Bea Essers
Liselot Thijs
Annick Van Gils
Lisa Tedesco Triccas
Sarah Meyer
Kaat Alaerts
Geert Verheyden
author_sort Nele De Bruyn
title Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial
title_short Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial
title_full Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial
title_sort does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? protocol of a phase ii randomized controlled trial
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Abstract Background The role of somatosensory feedback in motor performance has been warranted in the literature. Although sensorimotor deficits are common after stroke, current rehabilitation approaches primarily focus on restoring upper limb motor ability. Evidence for integrative sensorimotor rehabilitation approaches is scarce, as is knowledge about neural correlates of somatosensory impairments after stroke and the effect of rehabilitation on brain connectivity level. Therefore, we aim to investigate changes in sensorimotor function and brain connectivity following a sensorimotor therapy program compared to an attention-matched motor therapy program for the upper limb after stroke. Methods An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Sixty inpatient rehabilitation patients up to eight weeks after stroke will be included. Patients will be randomized to either an experimental group receiving sensorimotor therapy or a control group receiving attention-matched motor therapy for the upper limb, with both groups receiving conventional therapy. Thus, all patients will receive extra therapy, a total of 16 1-h sessions over four weeks. Patients will be assessed at baseline, after four weeks of training, and after four weeks of follow-up. Primary outcome measure is the Action Research Arm Test. Secondary outcome measures will consist of somatosensory, motor and cognitive assessments, and a standardized resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol. Discussion The integration of sensory and motor rehabilitation into one therapy model might provide the added value of this therapy to improve sensorimotor performance post stroke. Insight in the behavioral and brain connectivity changes post therapy will lead to a better understanding of working mechanisms of therapy and will provide new knowledge for patient-tailored therapy approaches. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03236376. Registered on 8 August 2017.
topic Stroke
Upper limb
Sensorimotor function
Randomized controlled trial
Functional connectivity
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2609-4
work_keys_str_mv AT neledebruyn doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT beaessers doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liselotthijs doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT annickvangils doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lisatedescotriccas doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sarahmeyer doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kaatalaerts doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT geertverheyden doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1725527670241886208