The assessment of annual rainfall field by applying different interpolation methods in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Abstract An accurate analysis of spatial rainfall distribution is of great importance for managing watershed water resources, in addition to giving support to meteorological studies and agricultural planning. This work compares the performance of two interpolation methods: Inverse distance weighted...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer
2021-06-01
|
Series: | SN Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04679-1 |
id |
doaj-d8eece6447584f27904b06929f3eae83 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d8eece6447584f27904b06929f3eae832021-06-06T11:21:26ZengSpringerSN Applied Sciences2523-39632523-39712021-06-013711710.1007/s42452-021-04679-1The assessment of annual rainfall field by applying different interpolation methods in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, BrazilDenis Rafael Silveira Ananias0Gilberto Rodrigues Liska1Luiz Alberto Beijo2Geraldo José Rodrigues Liska3Fortunato Silva de Menezes4Federal University of PampaDepartment of Agroindustrial Technology and Rural Socioeconomics, Federal University of São CarlosDepartment of Statistics, Federal University of AlfenasFederal University of AlfenasDepartment of Physics, Federal University of LavrasAbstract An accurate analysis of spatial rainfall distribution is of great importance for managing watershed water resources, in addition to giving support to meteorological studies and agricultural planning. This work compares the performance of two interpolation methods: Inverse distance weighted (IDW) and Kriging, in the analysis of annual rainfall spatial distribution. We use annual rainfall data for the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) from 1961 to 2017. To determine which proportion of the sample results in more accurate rainfall distribution maps, we use a certain amount of points close to the estimated point. We use mean squared error (MSE), coefficient of determination (R 2), root mean squared error (RMSE) and modified Willmott's concordance index (md). We conduct random fields simulations study, and the performance of the geostatistics and classic methods for the exposed case was evaluated in terms of precision and accuracy obtained by Monte Carlo simulation to support the results. The results indicate that the co-ordinary Kriging interpolator showed better goodness of fit, assuming altitude as a covariate. We concluded that the geostatistical method of Kriging using nine closer points (50% of nearest neighbors) was the one that better represented annual rainfall spatial distribution in the state of Rio Grande do Sul.https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04679-1Environmental planningCross-validationGeostatisticsInverse distance weightedOrdinary Kriging |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Denis Rafael Silveira Ananias Gilberto Rodrigues Liska Luiz Alberto Beijo Geraldo José Rodrigues Liska Fortunato Silva de Menezes |
spellingShingle |
Denis Rafael Silveira Ananias Gilberto Rodrigues Liska Luiz Alberto Beijo Geraldo José Rodrigues Liska Fortunato Silva de Menezes The assessment of annual rainfall field by applying different interpolation methods in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil SN Applied Sciences Environmental planning Cross-validation Geostatistics Inverse distance weighted Ordinary Kriging |
author_facet |
Denis Rafael Silveira Ananias Gilberto Rodrigues Liska Luiz Alberto Beijo Geraldo José Rodrigues Liska Fortunato Silva de Menezes |
author_sort |
Denis Rafael Silveira Ananias |
title |
The assessment of annual rainfall field by applying different interpolation methods in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
title_short |
The assessment of annual rainfall field by applying different interpolation methods in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
title_full |
The assessment of annual rainfall field by applying different interpolation methods in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
title_fullStr |
The assessment of annual rainfall field by applying different interpolation methods in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
The assessment of annual rainfall field by applying different interpolation methods in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
title_sort |
assessment of annual rainfall field by applying different interpolation methods in the state of rio grande do sul, brazil |
publisher |
Springer |
series |
SN Applied Sciences |
issn |
2523-3963 2523-3971 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Abstract An accurate analysis of spatial rainfall distribution is of great importance for managing watershed water resources, in addition to giving support to meteorological studies and agricultural planning. This work compares the performance of two interpolation methods: Inverse distance weighted (IDW) and Kriging, in the analysis of annual rainfall spatial distribution. We use annual rainfall data for the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) from 1961 to 2017. To determine which proportion of the sample results in more accurate rainfall distribution maps, we use a certain amount of points close to the estimated point. We use mean squared error (MSE), coefficient of determination (R 2), root mean squared error (RMSE) and modified Willmott's concordance index (md). We conduct random fields simulations study, and the performance of the geostatistics and classic methods for the exposed case was evaluated in terms of precision and accuracy obtained by Monte Carlo simulation to support the results. The results indicate that the co-ordinary Kriging interpolator showed better goodness of fit, assuming altitude as a covariate. We concluded that the geostatistical method of Kriging using nine closer points (50% of nearest neighbors) was the one that better represented annual rainfall spatial distribution in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. |
topic |
Environmental planning Cross-validation Geostatistics Inverse distance weighted Ordinary Kriging |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04679-1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT denisrafaelsilveiraananias theassessmentofannualrainfallfieldbyapplyingdifferentinterpolationmethodsinthestateofriograndedosulbrazil AT gilbertorodriguesliska theassessmentofannualrainfallfieldbyapplyingdifferentinterpolationmethodsinthestateofriograndedosulbrazil AT luizalbertobeijo theassessmentofannualrainfallfieldbyapplyingdifferentinterpolationmethodsinthestateofriograndedosulbrazil AT geraldojoserodriguesliska theassessmentofannualrainfallfieldbyapplyingdifferentinterpolationmethodsinthestateofriograndedosulbrazil AT fortunatosilvademenezes theassessmentofannualrainfallfieldbyapplyingdifferentinterpolationmethodsinthestateofriograndedosulbrazil AT denisrafaelsilveiraananias assessmentofannualrainfallfieldbyapplyingdifferentinterpolationmethodsinthestateofriograndedosulbrazil AT gilbertorodriguesliska assessmentofannualrainfallfieldbyapplyingdifferentinterpolationmethodsinthestateofriograndedosulbrazil AT luizalbertobeijo assessmentofannualrainfallfieldbyapplyingdifferentinterpolationmethodsinthestateofriograndedosulbrazil AT geraldojoserodriguesliska assessmentofannualrainfallfieldbyapplyingdifferentinterpolationmethodsinthestateofriograndedosulbrazil AT fortunatosilvademenezes assessmentofannualrainfallfieldbyapplyingdifferentinterpolationmethodsinthestateofriograndedosulbrazil |
_version_ |
1721394134155001856 |