Distinct SNP combinations confer susceptibility to urinary bladder cancer in smokers and non-smokers.

Recently, genome-wide association studies have identified and validated genetic variations associated with urinary bladder cancer (UBC). However, it is still unknown whether the high-risk alleles of several SNPs interact with one another, leading to an even higher disease risk. Additionally, there i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Holger Schwender, Silvia Selinski, Meinolf Blaszkewicz, Rosemarie Marchan, Katja Ickstadt, Klaus Golka, Jan G Hengstler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3527453?pdf=render
id doaj-d8e8428903814280b125c37c2b5f0964
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d8e8428903814280b125c37c2b5f09642020-11-25T01:11:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-01712e5188010.1371/journal.pone.0051880Distinct SNP combinations confer susceptibility to urinary bladder cancer in smokers and non-smokers.Holger SchwenderSilvia SelinskiMeinolf BlaszkewiczRosemarie MarchanKatja IckstadtKlaus GolkaJan G HengstlerRecently, genome-wide association studies have identified and validated genetic variations associated with urinary bladder cancer (UBC). However, it is still unknown whether the high-risk alleles of several SNPs interact with one another, leading to an even higher disease risk. Additionally, there is no information available on how the UBC risk due to these SNPs compare to the risk of cigarette smoking and to occupational exposure to urinary bladder carcinogens, and whether the same or different SNP combinations are relevant in smokers and non-smokers. To address these questions, we analyzed the genotypes of six SNPs, previously found to be associated with UBC, together with the GSTM1 deletion, in 1,595 UBC cases and 1,760 controls, stratified for smoking habits. We identified the strongest interactions of different orders and tested the stability of their effect by bootstrapping. We found that different SNP combinations were relevant in smokers and non-smokers. In smokers, polymorphisms involved in detoxification of cigarette smoke carcinogens were most relevant (GSTM1, rs11892031), in contrast to those in non-smokers with MYC and APOBEC3A near polymorphisms (rs9642880, rs1014971) being the most influential. Stable combinations of up to three high-risk alleles resulted in higher odds ratios (OR) than the individual SNPs, although the interaction effect was less than additive. The highest stable combination effects resulted in an OR of about 2.0, which is still lower than the ORs of cigarette smoking (here, current smokers' OR: 3.28) and comparable to occupational carcinogen exposure risks which, depending on the workplace, show mostly ORs up to 2.0.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3527453?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Holger Schwender
Silvia Selinski
Meinolf Blaszkewicz
Rosemarie Marchan
Katja Ickstadt
Klaus Golka
Jan G Hengstler
spellingShingle Holger Schwender
Silvia Selinski
Meinolf Blaszkewicz
Rosemarie Marchan
Katja Ickstadt
Klaus Golka
Jan G Hengstler
Distinct SNP combinations confer susceptibility to urinary bladder cancer in smokers and non-smokers.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Holger Schwender
Silvia Selinski
Meinolf Blaszkewicz
Rosemarie Marchan
Katja Ickstadt
Klaus Golka
Jan G Hengstler
author_sort Holger Schwender
title Distinct SNP combinations confer susceptibility to urinary bladder cancer in smokers and non-smokers.
title_short Distinct SNP combinations confer susceptibility to urinary bladder cancer in smokers and non-smokers.
title_full Distinct SNP combinations confer susceptibility to urinary bladder cancer in smokers and non-smokers.
title_fullStr Distinct SNP combinations confer susceptibility to urinary bladder cancer in smokers and non-smokers.
title_full_unstemmed Distinct SNP combinations confer susceptibility to urinary bladder cancer in smokers and non-smokers.
title_sort distinct snp combinations confer susceptibility to urinary bladder cancer in smokers and non-smokers.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Recently, genome-wide association studies have identified and validated genetic variations associated with urinary bladder cancer (UBC). However, it is still unknown whether the high-risk alleles of several SNPs interact with one another, leading to an even higher disease risk. Additionally, there is no information available on how the UBC risk due to these SNPs compare to the risk of cigarette smoking and to occupational exposure to urinary bladder carcinogens, and whether the same or different SNP combinations are relevant in smokers and non-smokers. To address these questions, we analyzed the genotypes of six SNPs, previously found to be associated with UBC, together with the GSTM1 deletion, in 1,595 UBC cases and 1,760 controls, stratified for smoking habits. We identified the strongest interactions of different orders and tested the stability of their effect by bootstrapping. We found that different SNP combinations were relevant in smokers and non-smokers. In smokers, polymorphisms involved in detoxification of cigarette smoke carcinogens were most relevant (GSTM1, rs11892031), in contrast to those in non-smokers with MYC and APOBEC3A near polymorphisms (rs9642880, rs1014971) being the most influential. Stable combinations of up to three high-risk alleles resulted in higher odds ratios (OR) than the individual SNPs, although the interaction effect was less than additive. The highest stable combination effects resulted in an OR of about 2.0, which is still lower than the ORs of cigarette smoking (here, current smokers' OR: 3.28) and comparable to occupational carcinogen exposure risks which, depending on the workplace, show mostly ORs up to 2.0.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3527453?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT holgerschwender distinctsnpcombinationsconfersusceptibilitytourinarybladdercancerinsmokersandnonsmokers
AT silviaselinski distinctsnpcombinationsconfersusceptibilitytourinarybladdercancerinsmokersandnonsmokers
AT meinolfblaszkewicz distinctsnpcombinationsconfersusceptibilitytourinarybladdercancerinsmokersandnonsmokers
AT rosemariemarchan distinctsnpcombinationsconfersusceptibilitytourinarybladdercancerinsmokersandnonsmokers
AT katjaickstadt distinctsnpcombinationsconfersusceptibilitytourinarybladdercancerinsmokersandnonsmokers
AT klausgolka distinctsnpcombinationsconfersusceptibilitytourinarybladdercancerinsmokersandnonsmokers
AT janghengstler distinctsnpcombinationsconfersusceptibilitytourinarybladdercancerinsmokersandnonsmokers
_version_ 1725168616048951296