Preface: Stuck in Motion? Capturing the Dialectics of Movement and Stasis in an Era of Containment

In this special section we rethink the role of movement and stasis in an age of globalization from an existential perspective. We suggest that this theoretical avenue is particularly well suited to move beyond the dualistic binaries that have haunted much writing on mobilities. Rather than fixating...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Annika Lems, Jelena Tošić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Suomen Antropologinen Seura (Finnish Anthropological Society) 2020-01-01
Series:Suomen Antropologi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.fi/suomenantropologi/article/view/77714
id doaj-d8c2af119b6f45519c9937ac20189b21
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d8c2af119b6f45519c9937ac20189b212020-11-25T01:57:46ZengSuomen Antropologinen Seura (Finnish Anthropological Society)Suomen Antropologi1799-89722020-01-01442319https://doi.org/10.30676/jfas.v44i2.77714Preface: Stuck in Motion? Capturing the Dialectics of Movement and Stasis in an Era of ContainmentAnnika Lems0Jelena Tošić 1Max Planck Institute for Social AnthropologyUniversity of St. GallenIn this special section we rethink the role of movement and stasis in an age of globalization from an existential perspective. We suggest that this theoretical avenue is particularly well suited to move beyond the dualistic binaries that have haunted much writing on mobilities. Rather than fixating movement and stasis into two opposite poles, this perspective allows us to productively work with the overlaps and paradoxes as they appear in the everyday, thereby carving out a dialectics of im/mobility. We argue that exploring the interplay of movement and stasis has become particularly important in the current global political climate, where the mobilities of people and groups deemed troublesome are violently cut short or obstructed in ways that keep them “stuck” in continuous loops of “motion”. By zooming in on the vectorial metaphors migrants and refugees seemingly stuck in immovable conditions deploy to make sense of their situations, we conceptualize both the existential orientation of migratory projects and the wider social and political coordinates impinging on these inner quests for (forward) movement and/or stillness.https://journal.fi/suomenantropologi/article/view/77714mobilityimmobilitymigrationexistential anthropologyexperiencecontainmentdialecticsethnographic theorydialogical writing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Annika Lems
Jelena Tošić
spellingShingle Annika Lems
Jelena Tošić
Preface: Stuck in Motion? Capturing the Dialectics of Movement and Stasis in an Era of Containment
Suomen Antropologi
mobility
immobility
migration
existential anthropology
experience
containment
dialectics
ethnographic theory
dialogical writing
author_facet Annika Lems
Jelena Tošić
author_sort Annika Lems
title Preface: Stuck in Motion? Capturing the Dialectics of Movement and Stasis in an Era of Containment
title_short Preface: Stuck in Motion? Capturing the Dialectics of Movement and Stasis in an Era of Containment
title_full Preface: Stuck in Motion? Capturing the Dialectics of Movement and Stasis in an Era of Containment
title_fullStr Preface: Stuck in Motion? Capturing the Dialectics of Movement and Stasis in an Era of Containment
title_full_unstemmed Preface: Stuck in Motion? Capturing the Dialectics of Movement and Stasis in an Era of Containment
title_sort preface: stuck in motion? capturing the dialectics of movement and stasis in an era of containment
publisher Suomen Antropologinen Seura (Finnish Anthropological Society)
series Suomen Antropologi
issn 1799-8972
publishDate 2020-01-01
description In this special section we rethink the role of movement and stasis in an age of globalization from an existential perspective. We suggest that this theoretical avenue is particularly well suited to move beyond the dualistic binaries that have haunted much writing on mobilities. Rather than fixating movement and stasis into two opposite poles, this perspective allows us to productively work with the overlaps and paradoxes as they appear in the everyday, thereby carving out a dialectics of im/mobility. We argue that exploring the interplay of movement and stasis has become particularly important in the current global political climate, where the mobilities of people and groups deemed troublesome are violently cut short or obstructed in ways that keep them “stuck” in continuous loops of “motion”. By zooming in on the vectorial metaphors migrants and refugees seemingly stuck in immovable conditions deploy to make sense of their situations, we conceptualize both the existential orientation of migratory projects and the wider social and political coordinates impinging on these inner quests for (forward) movement and/or stillness.
topic mobility
immobility
migration
existential anthropology
experience
containment
dialectics
ethnographic theory
dialogical writing
url https://journal.fi/suomenantropologi/article/view/77714
work_keys_str_mv AT annikalems prefacestuckinmotioncapturingthedialecticsofmovementandstasisinaneraofcontainment
AT jelenatosic prefacestuckinmotioncapturingthedialecticsofmovementandstasisinaneraofcontainment
_version_ 1724972581785698304