Arctic freshwater fluxes: sources, tracer budgets and inconsistencies
<p>The net rate of freshwater input to the Arctic Ocean has been calculated in the past by two methods: directly, as the sum of precipitation, evaporation and runoff, an approach hindered by sparsity of measurements, and by the ice and ocean budget method, where the net surface freshwater flu...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2019-08-01
|
| Series: | The Cryosphere |
| Online Access: | https://www.the-cryosphere.net/13/2111/2019/tc-13-2111-2019.pdf |
| Summary: | <p>The net rate of freshwater input to the Arctic Ocean has been calculated in the past by two methods: directly, as the sum of precipitation, evaporation and runoff, an approach hindered by sparsity of measurements, and by the ice and ocean budget method, where the net surface freshwater flux within a defined boundary is calculated from the rate of dilution of salinity, comparing ocean inflows with ice and ocean outflows. Here a third method is introduced, the geochemical method, as a modification of the budget method. A standard approach uses geochemical tracers (salinity, oxygen isotopes, inorganic nutrients) to compute “source fractions” that quantify a water parcel's constituent proportions of seawater, freshwater of meteoric origin, and either sea ice melt or brine (from the freezing-out of sea ice). The geochemical method combines the source fractions with the boundary velocity field of the budget method to quantify the net flux derived from each source. Here it is shown that the geochemical method generates an Arctic Ocean surface freshwater flux, which is also the meteoric source flux, of <span class="inline-formula">200±44</span> <span class="inline-formula">mSv</span> (<span class="inline-formula">1 Sv=10<sup>6</sup></span> m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>3</sup></span> s<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>), statistically indistinguishable from the budget method's <span class="inline-formula">187±44</span> <span class="inline-formula">mSv</span>, so that two different approaches to surface freshwater flux calculation are reconciled. The freshwater export rate of sea ice (<span class="inline-formula">40±14</span> <span class="inline-formula">mSv</span>) is similar to the brine export flux, due to the “freshwater deficit” left by the freezing-out of sea ice (<span class="inline-formula">60±50</span> <span class="inline-formula">mSv</span>). Inorganic nutrients are used to define Atlantic and Pacific seawater categories, and the results show significant non-conservation, whereby Atlantic seawater is effectively “converted” into Pacific seawater. This is hypothesized to be a consequence of denitrification within the Arctic Ocean, a process likely becoming more important with seasonal sea ice retreat. While inorganic nutrients may now be delivering ambiguous results on seawater origins, they may prove useful to quantify the Arctic Ocean's net denitrification rate. End point degeneracy is also discussed: multiple property definitions that lie along the same “mixing line” generate confused results.</p> |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1994-0416 1994-0424 |