Cooperation and Security: Examining the Political Discourse on Natural Gas Transit in Ukraine and Slovakia
The COVID-19 pandemic appeared in the midst of developing the European Green Deal, the most ambitious project to decarbonise the EU’s economy to date. Among other issues, the project highlighted the challenges connected to the long-term role of natural gas as a fossil fuel in the European economy. M...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/22/5969 |
id |
doaj-d8ae1ed72f284003bb701d8143e288b0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d8ae1ed72f284003bb701d8143e288b02020-11-25T04:03:51ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-11-01135969596910.3390/en13225969Cooperation and Security: Examining the Political Discourse on Natural Gas Transit in Ukraine and SlovakiaKateryna Yakovenko0Matúš Mišík1Department of Political Science, Comenius University in Bratislava, Gondova ulica 2, 81102 Bratislava, SlovakiaDepartment of Political Science, Comenius University in Bratislava, Gondova ulica 2, 81102 Bratislava, SlovakiaThe COVID-19 pandemic appeared in the midst of developing the European Green Deal, the most ambitious project to decarbonise the EU’s economy to date. Among other issues, the project highlighted the challenges connected to the long-term role of natural gas as a fossil fuel in the European economy. Moreover, the changes to the gas architecture caused by the development of new import infrastructure (especially Nord Stream and its extension, which is currently under construction) put additional pressure on the transit countries, mainly of which are linked to the Brotherhood pipeline. These have been strong supporters of natural gas utilisation and harsh critics of new pipelines that circumvent their territories, as they consider energy transit to be an important part of their energy sectors. This research examines the political discourse on gas transit in Slovakia and Ukraine in order to identify the main arguments connected to these positions. The paper examines a total of 233 textual units from both countries for the period 2014–2018. It concludes that, while Ukraine sees transit predominantly through the lens of cooperation with the EU and other actors, the Slovak political discourse considers gas transit in terms of energy security and the availability of gas for the national economy.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/22/5969European Uniondecarbonisationdiscoursenatural gasSlovakiatransit |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kateryna Yakovenko Matúš Mišík |
spellingShingle |
Kateryna Yakovenko Matúš Mišík Cooperation and Security: Examining the Political Discourse on Natural Gas Transit in Ukraine and Slovakia Energies European Union decarbonisation discourse natural gas Slovakia transit |
author_facet |
Kateryna Yakovenko Matúš Mišík |
author_sort |
Kateryna Yakovenko |
title |
Cooperation and Security: Examining the Political Discourse on Natural Gas Transit in Ukraine and Slovakia |
title_short |
Cooperation and Security: Examining the Political Discourse on Natural Gas Transit in Ukraine and Slovakia |
title_full |
Cooperation and Security: Examining the Political Discourse on Natural Gas Transit in Ukraine and Slovakia |
title_fullStr |
Cooperation and Security: Examining the Political Discourse on Natural Gas Transit in Ukraine and Slovakia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cooperation and Security: Examining the Political Discourse on Natural Gas Transit in Ukraine and Slovakia |
title_sort |
cooperation and security: examining the political discourse on natural gas transit in ukraine and slovakia |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Energies |
issn |
1996-1073 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
The COVID-19 pandemic appeared in the midst of developing the European Green Deal, the most ambitious project to decarbonise the EU’s economy to date. Among other issues, the project highlighted the challenges connected to the long-term role of natural gas as a fossil fuel in the European economy. Moreover, the changes to the gas architecture caused by the development of new import infrastructure (especially Nord Stream and its extension, which is currently under construction) put additional pressure on the transit countries, mainly of which are linked to the Brotherhood pipeline. These have been strong supporters of natural gas utilisation and harsh critics of new pipelines that circumvent their territories, as they consider energy transit to be an important part of their energy sectors. This research examines the political discourse on gas transit in Slovakia and Ukraine in order to identify the main arguments connected to these positions. The paper examines a total of 233 textual units from both countries for the period 2014–2018. It concludes that, while Ukraine sees transit predominantly through the lens of cooperation with the EU and other actors, the Slovak political discourse considers gas transit in terms of energy security and the availability of gas for the national economy. |
topic |
European Union decarbonisation discourse natural gas Slovakia transit |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/22/5969 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT katerynayakovenko cooperationandsecurityexaminingthepoliticaldiscourseonnaturalgastransitinukraineandslovakia AT matusmisik cooperationandsecurityexaminingthepoliticaldiscourseonnaturalgastransitinukraineandslovakia |
_version_ |
1724439028122517504 |