Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery Procedures
In robot-assisted procedures, the surgeon controls the surgical instruments from a remote console, while visually monitoring the procedure through the endoscope. There is no haptic feedback available to the surgeon, which impedes the assessment of diseased tissue and the detection of hidden structur...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2020-3146 |
id |
doaj-d89ff041e0284a789f601a91573ffeb5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d89ff041e0284a789f601a91573ffeb52021-09-06T19:19:29ZengDe GruyterCurrent Directions in Biomedical Engineering2364-55042020-09-016357157410.1515/cdbme-2020-3146cdbme-2020-3146Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery ProceduresSchaufler Anna0Illanes Alfredo1Maldonado Ivan2Boese Axel3Croner Roland4Friebe Michael5Otto-von-Guericke Universität, Universitätsplatz 2,Magdeburg, GermanyOtto-von-Guericke Universität,Magdeburg, GermanyOtto-von-Guericke Universität,Magdeburg, GermanyOtto-von-Guericke Universität,Magdeburg, GermanyOtto-von-Guericke Universität,Magdeburg, GermanyOtto-von-Guericke Universität,Magdeburg, GermanyIn robot-assisted procedures, the surgeon controls the surgical instruments from a remote console, while visually monitoring the procedure through the endoscope. There is no haptic feedback available to the surgeon, which impedes the assessment of diseased tissue and the detection of hidden structures beneath the tissue, such as vessels. Only visual clues are available to the surgeon to control the force applied to the tissue by the instruments, which poses a risk for iatrogenic injuries. Additional information on haptic interactions of the employed instruments and the treated tissue that is provided to the surgeon during robotic surgery could compensate for this deficit. Acoustic emissions (AE) from the instrument/tissue interactions, transmitted by the instrument are a potential source of this information. AE can be recorded by audio sensors that do not have to be integrated into the instruments, but that can be modularly attached to the outside of the instruments shaft or enclosure. The location of the sensor on a robotic system is essential for the applicability of the concept in real situations. While the signal strength of the acoustic emissions decreases with distance from the point of interaction, an installation close to the patient would require sterilization measures. The aim of this work is to investigate whether it is feasible to install the audio sensor in non-sterile areas far away from the patient and still be able to receive useful AE signals. To determine whether signals can be recorded at different potential mounting locations, instrument/tissue interactions with different textures were simulated in an experimental setup. The results showed that meaningful and valuable AE can be recorded in the non-sterile area of a robotic surgical system despite the expected signal losses.https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2020-3146robotic-assisted surgeryacoustic emissionhaptic feedback |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Schaufler Anna Illanes Alfredo Maldonado Ivan Boese Axel Croner Roland Friebe Michael |
spellingShingle |
Schaufler Anna Illanes Alfredo Maldonado Ivan Boese Axel Croner Roland Friebe Michael Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery Procedures Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering robotic-assisted surgery acoustic emission haptic feedback |
author_facet |
Schaufler Anna Illanes Alfredo Maldonado Ivan Boese Axel Croner Roland Friebe Michael |
author_sort |
Schaufler Anna |
title |
Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery Procedures |
title_short |
Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery Procedures |
title_full |
Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery Procedures |
title_fullStr |
Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery Procedures |
title_full_unstemmed |
Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery Procedures |
title_sort |
surgical audio guidance: feasibility check for robotic surgery procedures |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering |
issn |
2364-5504 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
In robot-assisted procedures, the surgeon controls the surgical instruments from a remote console, while visually monitoring the procedure through the endoscope. There is no haptic feedback available to the surgeon, which impedes the assessment of diseased tissue and the detection of hidden structures beneath the tissue, such as vessels. Only visual clues are available to the surgeon to control the force applied to the tissue by the instruments, which poses a risk for iatrogenic injuries. Additional information on haptic interactions of the employed instruments and the treated tissue that is provided to the surgeon during robotic surgery could compensate for this deficit. Acoustic emissions (AE) from the instrument/tissue interactions, transmitted by the instrument are a potential source of this information. AE can be recorded by audio sensors that do not have to be integrated into the instruments, but that can be modularly attached to the outside of the instruments shaft or enclosure. The location of the sensor on a robotic system is essential for the applicability of the concept in real situations. While the signal strength of the acoustic emissions decreases with distance from the point of interaction, an installation close to the patient would require sterilization measures. The aim of this work is to investigate whether it is feasible to install the audio sensor in non-sterile areas far away from the patient and still be able to receive useful AE signals. To determine whether signals can be recorded at different potential mounting locations, instrument/tissue interactions with different textures were simulated in an experimental setup. The results showed that meaningful and valuable AE can be recorded in the non-sterile area of a robotic surgical system despite the expected signal losses. |
topic |
robotic-assisted surgery acoustic emission haptic feedback |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2020-3146 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT schaufleranna surgicalaudioguidancefeasibilitycheckforroboticsurgeryprocedures AT illanesalfredo surgicalaudioguidancefeasibilitycheckforroboticsurgeryprocedures AT maldonadoivan surgicalaudioguidancefeasibilitycheckforroboticsurgeryprocedures AT boeseaxel surgicalaudioguidancefeasibilitycheckforroboticsurgeryprocedures AT cronerroland surgicalaudioguidancefeasibilitycheckforroboticsurgeryprocedures AT friebemichael surgicalaudioguidancefeasibilitycheckforroboticsurgeryprocedures |
_version_ |
1717778547142033408 |