Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery Procedures

In robot-assisted procedures, the surgeon controls the surgical instruments from a remote console, while visually monitoring the procedure through the endoscope. There is no haptic feedback available to the surgeon, which impedes the assessment of diseased tissue and the detection of hidden structur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schaufler Anna, Illanes Alfredo, Maldonado Ivan, Boese Axel, Croner Roland, Friebe Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2020-09-01
Series:Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2020-3146
id doaj-d89ff041e0284a789f601a91573ffeb5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d89ff041e0284a789f601a91573ffeb52021-09-06T19:19:29ZengDe GruyterCurrent Directions in Biomedical Engineering2364-55042020-09-016357157410.1515/cdbme-2020-3146cdbme-2020-3146Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery ProceduresSchaufler Anna0Illanes Alfredo1Maldonado Ivan2Boese Axel3Croner Roland4Friebe Michael5Otto-von-Guericke Universität, Universitätsplatz 2,Magdeburg, GermanyOtto-von-Guericke Universität,Magdeburg, GermanyOtto-von-Guericke Universität,Magdeburg, GermanyOtto-von-Guericke Universität,Magdeburg, GermanyOtto-von-Guericke Universität,Magdeburg, GermanyOtto-von-Guericke Universität,Magdeburg, GermanyIn robot-assisted procedures, the surgeon controls the surgical instruments from a remote console, while visually monitoring the procedure through the endoscope. There is no haptic feedback available to the surgeon, which impedes the assessment of diseased tissue and the detection of hidden structures beneath the tissue, such as vessels. Only visual clues are available to the surgeon to control the force applied to the tissue by the instruments, which poses a risk for iatrogenic injuries. Additional information on haptic interactions of the employed instruments and the treated tissue that is provided to the surgeon during robotic surgery could compensate for this deficit. Acoustic emissions (AE) from the instrument/tissue interactions, transmitted by the instrument are a potential source of this information. AE can be recorded by audio sensors that do not have to be integrated into the instruments, but that can be modularly attached to the outside of the instruments shaft or enclosure. The location of the sensor on a robotic system is essential for the applicability of the concept in real situations. While the signal strength of the acoustic emissions decreases with distance from the point of interaction, an installation close to the patient would require sterilization measures. The aim of this work is to investigate whether it is feasible to install the audio sensor in non-sterile areas far away from the patient and still be able to receive useful AE signals. To determine whether signals can be recorded at different potential mounting locations, instrument/tissue interactions with different textures were simulated in an experimental setup. The results showed that meaningful and valuable AE can be recorded in the non-sterile area of a robotic surgical system despite the expected signal losses.https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2020-3146robotic-assisted surgeryacoustic emissionhaptic feedback
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Schaufler Anna
Illanes Alfredo
Maldonado Ivan
Boese Axel
Croner Roland
Friebe Michael
spellingShingle Schaufler Anna
Illanes Alfredo
Maldonado Ivan
Boese Axel
Croner Roland
Friebe Michael
Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery Procedures
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
robotic-assisted surgery
acoustic emission
haptic feedback
author_facet Schaufler Anna
Illanes Alfredo
Maldonado Ivan
Boese Axel
Croner Roland
Friebe Michael
author_sort Schaufler Anna
title Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery Procedures
title_short Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery Procedures
title_full Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery Procedures
title_fullStr Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery Procedures
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Audio Guidance: Feasibility Check for Robotic Surgery Procedures
title_sort surgical audio guidance: feasibility check for robotic surgery procedures
publisher De Gruyter
series Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
issn 2364-5504
publishDate 2020-09-01
description In robot-assisted procedures, the surgeon controls the surgical instruments from a remote console, while visually monitoring the procedure through the endoscope. There is no haptic feedback available to the surgeon, which impedes the assessment of diseased tissue and the detection of hidden structures beneath the tissue, such as vessels. Only visual clues are available to the surgeon to control the force applied to the tissue by the instruments, which poses a risk for iatrogenic injuries. Additional information on haptic interactions of the employed instruments and the treated tissue that is provided to the surgeon during robotic surgery could compensate for this deficit. Acoustic emissions (AE) from the instrument/tissue interactions, transmitted by the instrument are a potential source of this information. AE can be recorded by audio sensors that do not have to be integrated into the instruments, but that can be modularly attached to the outside of the instruments shaft or enclosure. The location of the sensor on a robotic system is essential for the applicability of the concept in real situations. While the signal strength of the acoustic emissions decreases with distance from the point of interaction, an installation close to the patient would require sterilization measures. The aim of this work is to investigate whether it is feasible to install the audio sensor in non-sterile areas far away from the patient and still be able to receive useful AE signals. To determine whether signals can be recorded at different potential mounting locations, instrument/tissue interactions with different textures were simulated in an experimental setup. The results showed that meaningful and valuable AE can be recorded in the non-sterile area of a robotic surgical system despite the expected signal losses.
topic robotic-assisted surgery
acoustic emission
haptic feedback
url https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2020-3146
work_keys_str_mv AT schaufleranna surgicalaudioguidancefeasibilitycheckforroboticsurgeryprocedures
AT illanesalfredo surgicalaudioguidancefeasibilitycheckforroboticsurgeryprocedures
AT maldonadoivan surgicalaudioguidancefeasibilitycheckforroboticsurgeryprocedures
AT boeseaxel surgicalaudioguidancefeasibilitycheckforroboticsurgeryprocedures
AT cronerroland surgicalaudioguidancefeasibilitycheckforroboticsurgeryprocedures
AT friebemichael surgicalaudioguidancefeasibilitycheckforroboticsurgeryprocedures
_version_ 1717778547142033408