Comparison of clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfers using solid surface methodology with fresh blastocyst transfers

Objectives: The literature regarding clinical outcomes following day 5/6 vitrified warmed blastocysts transfer has been conflicting. We decided to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfer using a solid surface vitrification protocol with fresh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K Muthukumar, Mohan S Kamath, Ann M Mangalaraj, T K Aleyamma, Achamma Chandy, Korula George
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2013;volume=6;issue=1;spage=59;epage=64;aulast=Muthukumar
id doaj-d89ba2dcbccb4feea03d662e2e29f164
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d89ba2dcbccb4feea03d662e2e29f1642020-11-24T22:31:48ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Human Reproductive Sciences0974-12081998-47662013-01-0161596410.4103/0974-1208.112384Comparison of clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfers using solid surface methodology with fresh blastocyst transfersK MuthukumarMohan S KamathAnn M MangalarajT K AleyammaAchamma ChandyKorula GeorgeObjectives: The literature regarding clinical outcomes following day 5/6 vitrified warmed blastocysts transfer has been conflicting. We decided to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfer using a solid surface vitrification protocol with fresh blastocyst transfers. Settings: University teaching hospital. Study Design: A total of 249 women were retrospectively analyzed: 146 fresh day 5 blastocyst (group 1), 57 day 5 vitrified warmed blastocyst (group 2), and 46 vitrified warmed day 6 blastocyst (group 3) transfer cycles. Vitrification was done using solid surface methodology (non immersion protocol). The main outcomes were implantation rates, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rate per embryo transfer. Results: The baseline clinical characteristics were similar among all three groups. The implantation and clinical pregnancy rates following vitrified warmed day 6 blastocyst transfers (20.9% and 32.6%) were significantly lower as compared to day 5 fresh and vitrified warmed day 5 blastocyst transfers (40.3% and 56.1%, 36.3%, and 52.6%). However, there was no significant difference in the live birth rates across the three groups (group 1: 37.6%, group 2: 40.3%, and group 3: 28.2%). Conclusion: No statistically significant difference was observed in live birth rates between fresh day 5 blastocyst transfers and vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfers. Vitrification of blastocysts using solid surface methodology is an efficient method of cryopreservation.http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2013;volume=6;issue=1;spage=59;epage=64;aulast=MuthukumarBlastocystsolid surface methodologyvitrification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author K Muthukumar
Mohan S Kamath
Ann M Mangalaraj
T K Aleyamma
Achamma Chandy
Korula George
spellingShingle K Muthukumar
Mohan S Kamath
Ann M Mangalaraj
T K Aleyamma
Achamma Chandy
Korula George
Comparison of clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfers using solid surface methodology with fresh blastocyst transfers
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Blastocyst
solid surface methodology
vitrification
author_facet K Muthukumar
Mohan S Kamath
Ann M Mangalaraj
T K Aleyamma
Achamma Chandy
Korula George
author_sort K Muthukumar
title Comparison of clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfers using solid surface methodology with fresh blastocyst transfers
title_short Comparison of clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfers using solid surface methodology with fresh blastocyst transfers
title_full Comparison of clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfers using solid surface methodology with fresh blastocyst transfers
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfers using solid surface methodology with fresh blastocyst transfers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfers using solid surface methodology with fresh blastocyst transfers
title_sort comparison of clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfers using solid surface methodology with fresh blastocyst transfers
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
issn 0974-1208
1998-4766
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Objectives: The literature regarding clinical outcomes following day 5/6 vitrified warmed blastocysts transfer has been conflicting. We decided to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfer using a solid surface vitrification protocol with fresh blastocyst transfers. Settings: University teaching hospital. Study Design: A total of 249 women were retrospectively analyzed: 146 fresh day 5 blastocyst (group 1), 57 day 5 vitrified warmed blastocyst (group 2), and 46 vitrified warmed day 6 blastocyst (group 3) transfer cycles. Vitrification was done using solid surface methodology (non immersion protocol). The main outcomes were implantation rates, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rate per embryo transfer. Results: The baseline clinical characteristics were similar among all three groups. The implantation and clinical pregnancy rates following vitrified warmed day 6 blastocyst transfers (20.9% and 32.6%) were significantly lower as compared to day 5 fresh and vitrified warmed day 5 blastocyst transfers (40.3% and 56.1%, 36.3%, and 52.6%). However, there was no significant difference in the live birth rates across the three groups (group 1: 37.6%, group 2: 40.3%, and group 3: 28.2%). Conclusion: No statistically significant difference was observed in live birth rates between fresh day 5 blastocyst transfers and vitrified warmed day 5/6 blastocyst transfers. Vitrification of blastocysts using solid surface methodology is an efficient method of cryopreservation.
topic Blastocyst
solid surface methodology
vitrification
url http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2013;volume=6;issue=1;spage=59;epage=64;aulast=Muthukumar
work_keys_str_mv AT kmuthukumar comparisonofclinicaloutcomesfollowingvitrifiedwarmedday56blastocysttransfersusingsolidsurfacemethodologywithfreshblastocysttransfers
AT mohanskamath comparisonofclinicaloutcomesfollowingvitrifiedwarmedday56blastocysttransfersusingsolidsurfacemethodologywithfreshblastocysttransfers
AT annmmangalaraj comparisonofclinicaloutcomesfollowingvitrifiedwarmedday56blastocysttransfersusingsolidsurfacemethodologywithfreshblastocysttransfers
AT tkaleyamma comparisonofclinicaloutcomesfollowingvitrifiedwarmedday56blastocysttransfersusingsolidsurfacemethodologywithfreshblastocysttransfers
AT achammachandy comparisonofclinicaloutcomesfollowingvitrifiedwarmedday56blastocysttransfersusingsolidsurfacemethodologywithfreshblastocysttransfers
AT korulageorge comparisonofclinicaloutcomesfollowingvitrifiedwarmedday56blastocysttransfersusingsolidsurfacemethodologywithfreshblastocysttransfers
_version_ 1725736195176005632