Bioequivalence of twice-daily oral tacrolimus in transplant recipients: More evidence for consensus?
In this Perspective on the clinical trial by Rita Alloway and colleagues, Simon Ball explains the benefits to healthcare systems and individual patients of the bioequivalence established between generic and brand-name formulations of an immunosuppressive drug in transplant recipients.
Main Author: | Simon Ball |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-11-01
|
Series: | PLoS Medicine |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002429 |
Similar Items
-
Effects of Converting Tacrolimus Formulation from Twice-Daily to Once-Daily in Liver Transplantation Recipients
by: Ashok Thorat, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Cost-effectiveness of once-daily vs twice-daily tacrolimus among Hispanic and Black kidney transplant recipients
by: Grizzle, A.J, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Conversion from Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus Improves Graft Function but has no Influence on Proteinuria in Renal Transplant Recipients
by: Basic-Jukic Nikolina, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01) -
The Effect of Maintenance Treatment with Twice-Daily or Prolonged Once-Daily Tacrolimus Formulation on Visual Evoked Potentials in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients
by: Aureliusz Kolonko, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Bioequivalence between innovator and generic tacrolimus in liver and kidney transplant recipients: A randomized, crossover clinical trial.
by: Rita R Alloway, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)