Organisations as Computing Systems

Organisations are computing systems. The university’s sports centre is a computing system for managing sports teams and facilities. The tenure committee is a computing system for assigning tenure status. Despite an increasing number of publications in group ontology, the computational nature of orga...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Strohmaier David
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2021-03-01
Series:Journal of Social Ontology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0052
id doaj-d876ea4c6b5c4d99b26c793d6c638fd5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d876ea4c6b5c4d99b26c793d6c638fd52021-09-06T19:40:54ZengDe GruyterJournal of Social Ontology2196-96552196-96632021-03-016221123610.1515/jso-2020-0052Organisations as Computing SystemsStrohmaier David0Department of Computer Science and Technology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, Cambs., United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern IrelandOrganisations are computing systems. The university’s sports centre is a computing system for managing sports teams and facilities. The tenure committee is a computing system for assigning tenure status. Despite an increasing number of publications in group ontology, the computational nature of organisations has not been recognised. The present paper is the first in this debate to propose a theory of organisations as groups structured for computing. I begin by describing the current situation in group ontology and by spelling out the thesis in more detail. I then present the example of a sports centre to illustrate why one might intuitively think of organisations as computing systems. To substantiate the thesis, I introduce Piccinini’s restrictive analysis of physical computation. As I show, organisations meet all criteria for being computing systems. Organisations are structured groups with the function of manipulating medium-independent vehicles according to rules. Furthermore, I argue for the modal claim that this is a necessary feature of organisations. Having sketched the computational account of organisations, I compare it to other proposals in the literature.https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0052social ontologygroup agencyphilosophy of the social sciences
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Strohmaier David
spellingShingle Strohmaier David
Organisations as Computing Systems
Journal of Social Ontology
social ontology
group agency
philosophy of the social sciences
author_facet Strohmaier David
author_sort Strohmaier David
title Organisations as Computing Systems
title_short Organisations as Computing Systems
title_full Organisations as Computing Systems
title_fullStr Organisations as Computing Systems
title_full_unstemmed Organisations as Computing Systems
title_sort organisations as computing systems
publisher De Gruyter
series Journal of Social Ontology
issn 2196-9655
2196-9663
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Organisations are computing systems. The university’s sports centre is a computing system for managing sports teams and facilities. The tenure committee is a computing system for assigning tenure status. Despite an increasing number of publications in group ontology, the computational nature of organisations has not been recognised. The present paper is the first in this debate to propose a theory of organisations as groups structured for computing. I begin by describing the current situation in group ontology and by spelling out the thesis in more detail. I then present the example of a sports centre to illustrate why one might intuitively think of organisations as computing systems. To substantiate the thesis, I introduce Piccinini’s restrictive analysis of physical computation. As I show, organisations meet all criteria for being computing systems. Organisations are structured groups with the function of manipulating medium-independent vehicles according to rules. Furthermore, I argue for the modal claim that this is a necessary feature of organisations. Having sketched the computational account of organisations, I compare it to other proposals in the literature.
topic social ontology
group agency
philosophy of the social sciences
url https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0052
work_keys_str_mv AT strohmaierdavid organisationsascomputingsystems
_version_ 1717767492202397696