Organisations as Computing Systems
Organisations are computing systems. The university’s sports centre is a computing system for managing sports teams and facilities. The tenure committee is a computing system for assigning tenure status. Despite an increasing number of publications in group ontology, the computational nature of orga...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Social Ontology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0052 |
id |
doaj-d876ea4c6b5c4d99b26c793d6c638fd5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d876ea4c6b5c4d99b26c793d6c638fd52021-09-06T19:40:54ZengDe GruyterJournal of Social Ontology2196-96552196-96632021-03-016221123610.1515/jso-2020-0052Organisations as Computing SystemsStrohmaier David0Department of Computer Science and Technology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, Cambs., United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern IrelandOrganisations are computing systems. The university’s sports centre is a computing system for managing sports teams and facilities. The tenure committee is a computing system for assigning tenure status. Despite an increasing number of publications in group ontology, the computational nature of organisations has not been recognised. The present paper is the first in this debate to propose a theory of organisations as groups structured for computing. I begin by describing the current situation in group ontology and by spelling out the thesis in more detail. I then present the example of a sports centre to illustrate why one might intuitively think of organisations as computing systems. To substantiate the thesis, I introduce Piccinini’s restrictive analysis of physical computation. As I show, organisations meet all criteria for being computing systems. Organisations are structured groups with the function of manipulating medium-independent vehicles according to rules. Furthermore, I argue for the modal claim that this is a necessary feature of organisations. Having sketched the computational account of organisations, I compare it to other proposals in the literature.https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0052social ontologygroup agencyphilosophy of the social sciences |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Strohmaier David |
spellingShingle |
Strohmaier David Organisations as Computing Systems Journal of Social Ontology social ontology group agency philosophy of the social sciences |
author_facet |
Strohmaier David |
author_sort |
Strohmaier David |
title |
Organisations as Computing Systems |
title_short |
Organisations as Computing Systems |
title_full |
Organisations as Computing Systems |
title_fullStr |
Organisations as Computing Systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Organisations as Computing Systems |
title_sort |
organisations as computing systems |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Journal of Social Ontology |
issn |
2196-9655 2196-9663 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Organisations are computing systems. The university’s sports centre is a computing system for managing sports teams and facilities. The tenure committee is a computing system for assigning tenure status. Despite an increasing number of publications in group ontology, the computational nature of organisations has not been recognised. The present paper is the first in this debate to propose a theory of organisations as groups structured for computing. I begin by describing the current situation in group ontology and by spelling out the thesis in more detail. I then present the example of a sports centre to illustrate why one might intuitively think of organisations as computing systems. To substantiate the thesis, I introduce Piccinini’s restrictive analysis of physical computation. As I show, organisations meet all criteria for being computing systems. Organisations are structured groups with the function of manipulating medium-independent vehicles according to rules. Furthermore, I argue for the modal claim that this is a necessary feature of organisations. Having sketched the computational account of organisations, I compare it to other proposals in the literature. |
topic |
social ontology group agency philosophy of the social sciences |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0052 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT strohmaierdavid organisationsascomputingsystems |
_version_ |
1717767492202397696 |