Effect of Applying Techniques and Polymer Content on Strength and Drying Shrinkage of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete

The purposes of this study were to evaluate compressive strength, flexural strength, and drying shrinkage of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) applying different techniques and varying polymer content. Two groups of specimens were classified applying the techniques: sprayed and premixed methods...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ianleng Ratthanan, Leelawat Thatchavee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713803006
id doaj-d86ee760d18e4385b7bcb90f05afdab4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d86ee760d18e4385b7bcb90f05afdab42021-02-02T02:46:07ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2017-01-011380300610.1051/matecconf/201713803006matecconf_eacef2017_03006Effect of Applying Techniques and Polymer Content on Strength and Drying Shrinkage of Glass Fiber Reinforced ConcreteIanleng RatthananLeelawat ThatchaveeThe purposes of this study were to evaluate compressive strength, flexural strength, and drying shrinkage of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) applying different techniques and varying polymer content. Two groups of specimens were classified applying the techniques: sprayed and premixed methods. AR-Glass was used with fiber content of 3 to 4% by volume. GFRC was mixed and applied different techniques with proportions of Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SBR) content of 0%, 3%, 6%, and 9% by weight of cement. Compressive and flexural strength tests were performed at 1 and 28 days. Drying shrinkage tests were measured up to 98 days. The results obtained showed that increasing the SBR content showed a lower compressive strength of GFRC for both sprayed and premixed techniques. In the other hand, 28-day flexural strength results of GFRC for both premixed and sprayed techniques were found to increase with increasing SBR content. The GFRC mixes using sprayed technique exhibited flexural strength higher than the corresponding mixes using premixed technique because of the two-dimensional layer of fiber alignment for the sprayed technique. Increasing the SBR content exhibited the lower drying shrinkage of GFRC. At the age of 98 days, the drying shrinkage of GFRC using 9% SBR content was about 40% lower than that of GFRC using 0% SBR content.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713803006
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ianleng Ratthanan
Leelawat Thatchavee
spellingShingle Ianleng Ratthanan
Leelawat Thatchavee
Effect of Applying Techniques and Polymer Content on Strength and Drying Shrinkage of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Ianleng Ratthanan
Leelawat Thatchavee
author_sort Ianleng Ratthanan
title Effect of Applying Techniques and Polymer Content on Strength and Drying Shrinkage of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete
title_short Effect of Applying Techniques and Polymer Content on Strength and Drying Shrinkage of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete
title_full Effect of Applying Techniques and Polymer Content on Strength and Drying Shrinkage of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete
title_fullStr Effect of Applying Techniques and Polymer Content on Strength and Drying Shrinkage of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Applying Techniques and Polymer Content on Strength and Drying Shrinkage of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete
title_sort effect of applying techniques and polymer content on strength and drying shrinkage of glass fiber reinforced concrete
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2017-01-01
description The purposes of this study were to evaluate compressive strength, flexural strength, and drying shrinkage of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) applying different techniques and varying polymer content. Two groups of specimens were classified applying the techniques: sprayed and premixed methods. AR-Glass was used with fiber content of 3 to 4% by volume. GFRC was mixed and applied different techniques with proportions of Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SBR) content of 0%, 3%, 6%, and 9% by weight of cement. Compressive and flexural strength tests were performed at 1 and 28 days. Drying shrinkage tests were measured up to 98 days. The results obtained showed that increasing the SBR content showed a lower compressive strength of GFRC for both sprayed and premixed techniques. In the other hand, 28-day flexural strength results of GFRC for both premixed and sprayed techniques were found to increase with increasing SBR content. The GFRC mixes using sprayed technique exhibited flexural strength higher than the corresponding mixes using premixed technique because of the two-dimensional layer of fiber alignment for the sprayed technique. Increasing the SBR content exhibited the lower drying shrinkage of GFRC. At the age of 98 days, the drying shrinkage of GFRC using 9% SBR content was about 40% lower than that of GFRC using 0% SBR content.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713803006
work_keys_str_mv AT ianlengratthanan effectofapplyingtechniquesandpolymercontentonstrengthanddryingshrinkageofglassfiberreinforcedconcrete
AT leelawatthatchavee effectofapplyingtechniquesandpolymercontentonstrengthanddryingshrinkageofglassfiberreinforcedconcrete
_version_ 1724309316707549184