Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects

Owing to financial constraints, it becomes imperative to rank major transport projects to determine implementation priorities and budget allocations. The central Government in Taiwan is using rankings derived from the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and direct subjective rankings to set funding pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheng-Wei Su, Min-Yuan Cheng, Feng-Bor Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2006-12-01
Series:Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://localhost/journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/8814
id doaj-d859efb2b2764dcf8f4dd2b67dc39de0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d859efb2b2764dcf8f4dd2b67dc39de02021-07-02T08:13:26ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityJournal of Civil Engineering and Management1392-37301822-36052006-12-0112410.3846/13923730.2006.9636405Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projectsCheng-Wei Su0Min-Yuan Cheng1Feng-Bor Lin2Dept of Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology. Deputy Chief, Division of Transportation Planning, Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communications, 240 Tunhwa N. Road, Taipei, TaiwanDept of Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 43, Keelung Road, Sec. 4, Taipei, TaiwanDept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York 13699, U.S.A. Owing to financial constraints, it becomes imperative to rank major transport projects to determine implementation priorities and budget allocations. The central Government in Taiwan is using rankings derived from the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and direct subjective rankings to set funding priorities. The current approach does not account for the variations in rankings for setting these priorities. Nor does it adequately consider the compatibility with the proposed projects and the national policies in transport infrastructure development. To address these problems, the Central Government has revised the method for project ranking. The revised method expands the matrix of the attributes and impacts that are to be evaluated. It also uses a Monte Carlo simulation analysis to help in determining the rank orders. A pilot study was conducted to assess the revised method. The study uses 25 major rail projects proposed in 2002 as a test bed. Pagrindinių susisiekimo projektų suskirstymo pagal rangus bÅ«das, remiantis modeliavimu Santrauka DÄ—l finansinių apribojimų pagrindiniai susisiekimo projektai turi bÅ«ti suskirstyti pagal rangus, nustatant įgyvendinimo prioritetus ir biudžeto paskirstymÄ…. Taivanio centrinÄ— vyriausybÄ— rangams nustatyti naudojasi analitiniu hierarchiniu procesu (AHP) ir tiesiogiai suteikia rangus prioritetinei finansavimo eilei. TaÄiau Å¡is metodas nÄ—ra adekvatus siÅ«lomų projektų ir nacionalinÄ—s susisiekimo infrastruktÅ«ros plÄ—tojimo politikos suderinamumui. Å iai problemai sprÄ™sti bÅ«tina peržiÅ«rÄ—ti projektų suskirstymo pagal rangus metodÄ…. Patikslintame metode iÅ¡plÄ—sta atributų matrica. Rangų sekai nustatyti taikomas Monte Karlo modeliavimo metodas. Patikslinto metodo analizei atlikta bandomoji studija. Kaip tyrimo objektai studijoje panaudoti 2002 m. pasiÅ«lyti 25 pagrindiniai geležinkelio projektai. Raktiniai žodžiai: analitinis hierarchinis procesas, Monte Karlo modeliavimas, projektų suskirstymas pagal rangus, geležinkelio projektai. First Published Online: 14 Oct 2010 http://localhost/journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/8814analytic hierarchy processMonte Carlo simulationproject rankingrail projects
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cheng-Wei Su
Min-Yuan Cheng
Feng-Bor Lin
spellingShingle Cheng-Wei Su
Min-Yuan Cheng
Feng-Bor Lin
Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects
Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
analytic hierarchy process
Monte Carlo simulation
project ranking
rail projects
author_facet Cheng-Wei Su
Min-Yuan Cheng
Feng-Bor Lin
author_sort Cheng-Wei Su
title Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects
title_short Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects
title_full Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects
title_fullStr Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects
title_full_unstemmed Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects
title_sort simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
series Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
issn 1392-3730
1822-3605
publishDate 2006-12-01
description Owing to financial constraints, it becomes imperative to rank major transport projects to determine implementation priorities and budget allocations. The central Government in Taiwan is using rankings derived from the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and direct subjective rankings to set funding priorities. The current approach does not account for the variations in rankings for setting these priorities. Nor does it adequately consider the compatibility with the proposed projects and the national policies in transport infrastructure development. To address these problems, the Central Government has revised the method for project ranking. The revised method expands the matrix of the attributes and impacts that are to be evaluated. It also uses a Monte Carlo simulation analysis to help in determining the rank orders. A pilot study was conducted to assess the revised method. The study uses 25 major rail projects proposed in 2002 as a test bed. Pagrindinių susisiekimo projektų suskirstymo pagal rangus bÅ«das, remiantis modeliavimu Santrauka DÄ—l finansinių apribojimų pagrindiniai susisiekimo projektai turi bÅ«ti suskirstyti pagal rangus, nustatant įgyvendinimo prioritetus ir biudžeto paskirstymÄ…. Taivanio centrinÄ— vyriausybÄ— rangams nustatyti naudojasi analitiniu hierarchiniu procesu (AHP) ir tiesiogiai suteikia rangus prioritetinei finansavimo eilei. TaÄiau Å¡is metodas nÄ—ra adekvatus siÅ«lomų projektų ir nacionalinÄ—s susisiekimo infrastruktÅ«ros plÄ—tojimo politikos suderinamumui. Å iai problemai sprÄ™sti bÅ«tina peržiÅ«rÄ—ti projektų suskirstymo pagal rangus metodÄ…. Patikslintame metode iÅ¡plÄ—sta atributų matrica. Rangų sekai nustatyti taikomas Monte Karlo modeliavimo metodas. Patikslinto metodo analizei atlikta bandomoji studija. Kaip tyrimo objektai studijoje panaudoti 2002 m. pasiÅ«lyti 25 pagrindiniai geležinkelio projektai. Raktiniai žodžiai: analitinis hierarchinis procesas, Monte Karlo modeliavimas, projektų suskirstymas pagal rangus, geležinkelio projektai. First Published Online: 14 Oct 2010
topic analytic hierarchy process
Monte Carlo simulation
project ranking
rail projects
url http://localhost/journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/8814
work_keys_str_mv AT chengweisu simulationaenhancedapproachforrankingmajortransportprojects
AT minyuancheng simulationaenhancedapproachforrankingmajortransportprojects
AT fengborlin simulationaenhancedapproachforrankingmajortransportprojects
_version_ 1721335045209194496