Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects
Owing to financial constraints, it becomes imperative to rank major transport projects to determine implementation priorities and budget allocations. The central Government in Taiwan is using rankings derived from the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and direct subjective rankings to set funding pr...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
2006-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Civil Engineering and Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://localhost/journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/8814 |
id |
doaj-d859efb2b2764dcf8f4dd2b67dc39de0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d859efb2b2764dcf8f4dd2b67dc39de02021-07-02T08:13:26ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityJournal of Civil Engineering and Management1392-37301822-36052006-12-0112410.3846/13923730.2006.9636405Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projectsCheng-Wei Su0Min-Yuan Cheng1Feng-Bor Lin2Dept of Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology. Deputy Chief, Division of Transportation Planning, Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communications, 240 Tunhwa N. Road, Taipei, TaiwanDept of Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 43, Keelung Road, Sec. 4, Taipei, TaiwanDept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York 13699, U.S.A. Owing to financial constraints, it becomes imperative to rank major transport projects to determine implementation priorities and budget allocations. The central Government in Taiwan is using rankings derived from the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and direct subjective rankings to set funding priorities. The current approach does not account for the variations in rankings for setting these priorities. Nor does it adequately consider the compatibility with the proposed projects and the national policies in transport infrastructure development. To address these problems, the Central Government has revised the method for project ranking. The revised method expands the matrix of the attributes and impacts that are to be evaluated. It also uses a Monte Carlo simulation analysis to help in determining the rank orders. A pilot study was conducted to assess the revised method. The study uses 25 major rail projects proposed in 2002 as a test bed. Pagrindinių susisiekimo projektų suskirstymo pagal rangus bÅ«das, remiantis modeliavimu Santrauka DÄ—l finansinių apribojimų pagrindiniai susisiekimo projektai turi bÅ«ti suskirstyti pagal rangus, nustatant įgyvendinimo prioritetus ir biudžeto paskirstymÄ…. Taivanio centrinÄ— vyriausybÄ— rangams nustatyti naudojasi analitiniu hierarchiniu procesu (AHP) ir tiesiogiai suteikia rangus prioritetinei finansavimo eilei. TaÄiau Å¡is metodas nÄ—ra adekvatus siÅ«lomų projektų ir nacionalinÄ—s susisiekimo infrastruktÅ«ros plÄ—tojimo politikos suderinamumui. Å iai problemai sprÄ™sti bÅ«tina peržiÅ«rÄ—ti projektų suskirstymo pagal rangus metodÄ…. Patikslintame metode iÅ¡plÄ—sta atributų matrica. Rangų sekai nustatyti taikomas Monte Karlo modeliavimo metodas. Patikslinto metodo analizei atlikta bandomoji studija. Kaip tyrimo objektai studijoje panaudoti 2002 m. pasiÅ«lyti 25 pagrindiniai geležinkelio projektai. Raktiniai žodžiai: analitinis hierarchinis procesas, Monte Karlo modeliavimas, projektų suskirstymas pagal rangus, geležinkelio projektai. First Published Online: 14 Oct 2010 http://localhost/journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/8814analytic hierarchy processMonte Carlo simulationproject rankingrail projects |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cheng-Wei Su Min-Yuan Cheng Feng-Bor Lin |
spellingShingle |
Cheng-Wei Su Min-Yuan Cheng Feng-Bor Lin Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects Journal of Civil Engineering and Management analytic hierarchy process Monte Carlo simulation project ranking rail projects |
author_facet |
Cheng-Wei Su Min-Yuan Cheng Feng-Bor Lin |
author_sort |
Cheng-Wei Su |
title |
Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects |
title_short |
Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects |
title_full |
Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects |
title_fullStr |
Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects |
title_sort |
simulationâ€enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects |
publisher |
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University |
series |
Journal of Civil Engineering and Management |
issn |
1392-3730 1822-3605 |
publishDate |
2006-12-01 |
description |
Owing to financial constraints, it becomes imperative to rank major transport projects to determine implementation priorities and budget allocations. The central Government in Taiwan is using rankings derived from the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and direct subjective rankings to set funding priorities. The current approach does not account for the variations in rankings for setting these priorities. Nor does it adequately consider the compatibility with the proposed projects and the national policies in transport infrastructure development. To address these problems, the Central Government has revised the method for project ranking. The revised method expands the matrix of the attributes and impacts that are to be evaluated. It also uses a Monte Carlo simulation analysis to help in determining the rank orders. A pilot study was conducted to assess the revised method. The study uses 25 major rail projects proposed in 2002 as a test bed.
Pagrindinių susisiekimo projektų suskirstymo pagal rangus būdas, remiantis modeliavimu
Santrauka
DÄ—l finansinių apribojimų pagrindiniai susisiekimo projektai turi bÅ«ti suskirstyti pagal rangus, nustatant įgyvendinimo prioritetus ir biudžeto paskirstymÄ…. Taivanio centrinÄ— vyriausybÄ— rangams nustatyti naudojasi analitiniu hierarchiniu procesu (AHP) ir tiesiogiai suteikia rangus prioritetinei finansavimo eilei. TaÄiau Å¡is metodas nÄ—ra adekvatus siÅ«lomų projektų ir nacionalinÄ—s susisiekimo infrastruktÅ«ros plÄ—tojimo politikos suderinamumui. Å iai problemai sprÄ™sti bÅ«tina peržiÅ«rÄ—ti projektų suskirstymo pagal rangus metodÄ…. Patikslintame metode iÅ¡plÄ—sta atributų matrica. Rangų sekai nustatyti taikomas Monte Karlo modeliavimo metodas. Patikslinto metodo analizei atlikta bandomoji studija. Kaip tyrimo objektai studijoje panaudoti 2002 m. pasiÅ«lyti 25 pagrindiniai geležinkelio projektai.
Raktiniai žodžiai: analitinis hierarchinis procesas, Monte Karlo modeliavimas, projektų suskirstymas pagal rangus, geležinkelio projektai.
First Published Online: 14 Oct 2010
|
topic |
analytic hierarchy process Monte Carlo simulation project ranking rail projects |
url |
http://localhost/journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/8814 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chengweisu simulationaenhancedapproachforrankingmajortransportprojects AT minyuancheng simulationaenhancedapproachforrankingmajortransportprojects AT fengborlin simulationaenhancedapproachforrankingmajortransportprojects |
_version_ |
1721335045209194496 |