Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz Band
A spatial multiplexing (SM) array and a beamforming (BF) array with similar antenna size working at 28 GHz are designed and fabricated. In the SM array, a 4 × 4 MIMO system is realized with each port composed of a four-element subarray. In the BF array, the whole 16 elements are used to formulate a...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2017-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Antennas and Propagation |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7253623 |
id |
doaj-d847f835665f4a6584efddcfbf92ada4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d847f835665f4a6584efddcfbf92ada42020-11-24T23:14:31ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Antennas and Propagation1687-58691687-58772017-01-01201710.1155/2017/72536237253623Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz BandDazhi Piao0Xingning Jia1Xiaochuan Ma2Qingxin Guo3Zengrui Li4Department of Communication Engineering, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, ChinaDepartment of Communication Engineering, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, ChinaDepartment of Communication Engineering, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, ChinaDepartment of Communication Engineering, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, ChinaDepartment of Communication Engineering, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, ChinaA spatial multiplexing (SM) array and a beamforming (BF) array with similar antenna size working at 28 GHz are designed and fabricated. In the SM array, a 4 × 4 MIMO system is realized with each port composed of a four-element subarray. In the BF array, the whole 16 elements are used to formulate a high-gain array. The measured S-parameters are in agreement with the simulated results. For both arrays, the channel capacities are computed by the measured channel matrix and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in an office room. Results show that capacity of the SM system is larger than that of the BF system, although the gain of BF array is about 5 dB larger than that of the SM array. However, the capacity of the SM array depends heavily on SNR; specifically, for the 1 dBm transmit power, communication distance R=25 cm, the ergodic capacity of the SM system is 2.76 times that of the BF system, and if R=250 cm, the capacity gain is reduced to 1.45. Furthermore, compared with the BF array, the SM array has a more robust performance over antenna misalignment, because of the wider beamwidth.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7253623 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dazhi Piao Xingning Jia Xiaochuan Ma Qingxin Guo Zengrui Li |
spellingShingle |
Dazhi Piao Xingning Jia Xiaochuan Ma Qingxin Guo Zengrui Li Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz Band International Journal of Antennas and Propagation |
author_facet |
Dazhi Piao Xingning Jia Xiaochuan Ma Qingxin Guo Zengrui Li |
author_sort |
Dazhi Piao |
title |
Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz Band |
title_short |
Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz Band |
title_full |
Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz Band |
title_fullStr |
Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz Band |
title_full_unstemmed |
Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz Band |
title_sort |
measured performance comparisons between spatial multiplexing and beamforming arrays in the 28 ghz band |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation |
issn |
1687-5869 1687-5877 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
A spatial multiplexing (SM) array and a beamforming (BF) array with similar antenna size working at 28 GHz are designed and fabricated. In the SM array, a 4 × 4 MIMO system is realized with each port composed of a four-element subarray. In the BF array, the whole 16 elements are used to formulate a high-gain array. The measured S-parameters are in agreement with the simulated results. For both arrays, the channel capacities are computed by the measured channel matrix and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in an office room. Results show that capacity of the SM system is larger than that of the BF system, although the gain of BF array is about 5 dB larger than that of the SM array. However, the capacity of the SM array depends heavily on SNR; specifically, for the 1 dBm transmit power, communication distance R=25 cm, the ergodic capacity of the SM system is 2.76 times that of the BF system, and if R=250 cm, the capacity gain is reduced to 1.45. Furthermore, compared with the BF array, the SM array has a more robust performance over antenna misalignment, because of the wider beamwidth. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7253623 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dazhipiao measuredperformancecomparisonsbetweenspatialmultiplexingandbeamformingarraysinthe28ghzband AT xingningjia measuredperformancecomparisonsbetweenspatialmultiplexingandbeamformingarraysinthe28ghzband AT xiaochuanma measuredperformancecomparisonsbetweenspatialmultiplexingandbeamformingarraysinthe28ghzband AT qingxinguo measuredperformancecomparisonsbetweenspatialmultiplexingandbeamformingarraysinthe28ghzband AT zengruili measuredperformancecomparisonsbetweenspatialmultiplexingandbeamformingarraysinthe28ghzband |
_version_ |
1725593822654627840 |