Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz Band

A spatial multiplexing (SM) array and a beamforming (BF) array with similar antenna size working at 28 GHz are designed and fabricated. In the SM array, a 4 × 4 MIMO system is realized with each port composed of a four-element subarray. In the BF array, the whole 16 elements are used to formulate a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dazhi Piao, Xingning Jia, Xiaochuan Ma, Qingxin Guo, Zengrui Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2017-01-01
Series:International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7253623
id doaj-d847f835665f4a6584efddcfbf92ada4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d847f835665f4a6584efddcfbf92ada42020-11-24T23:14:31ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Antennas and Propagation1687-58691687-58772017-01-01201710.1155/2017/72536237253623Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz BandDazhi Piao0Xingning Jia1Xiaochuan Ma2Qingxin Guo3Zengrui Li4Department of Communication Engineering, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, ChinaDepartment of Communication Engineering, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, ChinaDepartment of Communication Engineering, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, ChinaDepartment of Communication Engineering, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, ChinaDepartment of Communication Engineering, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, ChinaA spatial multiplexing (SM) array and a beamforming (BF) array with similar antenna size working at 28 GHz are designed and fabricated. In the SM array, a 4 × 4 MIMO system is realized with each port composed of a four-element subarray. In the BF array, the whole 16 elements are used to formulate a high-gain array. The measured S-parameters are in agreement with the simulated results. For both arrays, the channel capacities are computed by the measured channel matrix and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in an office room. Results show that capacity of the SM system is larger than that of the BF system, although the gain of BF array is about 5 dB larger than that of the SM array. However, the capacity of the SM array depends heavily on SNR; specifically, for the 1 dBm transmit power, communication distance R=25 cm, the ergodic capacity of the SM system is 2.76 times that of the BF system, and if R=250 cm, the capacity gain is reduced to 1.45. Furthermore, compared with the BF array, the SM array has a more robust performance over antenna misalignment, because of the wider beamwidth.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7253623
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dazhi Piao
Xingning Jia
Xiaochuan Ma
Qingxin Guo
Zengrui Li
spellingShingle Dazhi Piao
Xingning Jia
Xiaochuan Ma
Qingxin Guo
Zengrui Li
Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz Band
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
author_facet Dazhi Piao
Xingning Jia
Xiaochuan Ma
Qingxin Guo
Zengrui Li
author_sort Dazhi Piao
title Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz Band
title_short Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz Band
title_full Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz Band
title_fullStr Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz Band
title_full_unstemmed Measured Performance Comparisons between Spatial Multiplexing and Beamforming Arrays in the 28 GHz Band
title_sort measured performance comparisons between spatial multiplexing and beamforming arrays in the 28 ghz band
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
issn 1687-5869
1687-5877
publishDate 2017-01-01
description A spatial multiplexing (SM) array and a beamforming (BF) array with similar antenna size working at 28 GHz are designed and fabricated. In the SM array, a 4 × 4 MIMO system is realized with each port composed of a four-element subarray. In the BF array, the whole 16 elements are used to formulate a high-gain array. The measured S-parameters are in agreement with the simulated results. For both arrays, the channel capacities are computed by the measured channel matrix and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in an office room. Results show that capacity of the SM system is larger than that of the BF system, although the gain of BF array is about 5 dB larger than that of the SM array. However, the capacity of the SM array depends heavily on SNR; specifically, for the 1 dBm transmit power, communication distance R=25 cm, the ergodic capacity of the SM system is 2.76 times that of the BF system, and if R=250 cm, the capacity gain is reduced to 1.45. Furthermore, compared with the BF array, the SM array has a more robust performance over antenna misalignment, because of the wider beamwidth.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7253623
work_keys_str_mv AT dazhipiao measuredperformancecomparisonsbetweenspatialmultiplexingandbeamformingarraysinthe28ghzband
AT xingningjia measuredperformancecomparisonsbetweenspatialmultiplexingandbeamformingarraysinthe28ghzband
AT xiaochuanma measuredperformancecomparisonsbetweenspatialmultiplexingandbeamformingarraysinthe28ghzband
AT qingxinguo measuredperformancecomparisonsbetweenspatialmultiplexingandbeamformingarraysinthe28ghzband
AT zengruili measuredperformancecomparisonsbetweenspatialmultiplexingandbeamformingarraysinthe28ghzband
_version_ 1725593822654627840