Making Sense. On the Cluster significatio-intentio in Medieval and “Austrian” Philosophies

“Austrian” (or “Austro-German”) philosophy of language is characterized, among other things, by the following two features: (1) Problems of language are considered within the broader framework of an intentionality-based philosophy of mind—or, to put it more precisely, questions of meaning are consid...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laurent Cesalli, Claudio Majolino
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Université de Lille 2014-05-01
Series:Methodos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/4068
id doaj-d84121f83eda4f6e863f9b171c9b4f77
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d84121f83eda4f6e863f9b171c9b4f772020-11-25T01:30:48ZfraUniversité de LilleMethodos1769-73792014-05-011410.4000/methodos.4068Making Sense. On the Cluster significatio-intentio in Medieval and “Austrian” PhilosophiesLaurent CesalliClaudio Majolino“Austrian” (or “Austro-German”) philosophy of language is characterized, among other things, by the following two features: (1) Problems of language are considered within the broader framework of an intentionality-based philosophy of mind—or, to put it more precisely, questions of meaning are considered as involving a quite articulated theory of intentions; (2) several aspects of such an account are explicitly presented as inspired by or somehow already at work in the Medieval Scholastic tradition. In this study we follow the track indicated by these two features and use some “Austrian” reflections on the articulation between meanings and intentions as a “heuristic filter”, as it were, to shed a new and different light on some Medieval debates in philosophy of language on the relationship between significare and intendere. It will be roughly divided into three parts. We begin by singling out some distinctive tenets of the “Austrian” strategy aimed at describing the relationship between meaning and intentions (section I), and then turn to various Medieval texts from the 13th and 14th century dealing with the two related notions of significatio and intentio (section II). The upshot of our investigation is to show how, for both “Austrian” and Medieval philosophers of language (and beyond their differences), a proper understanding of linguistic meaning—in the twofold sense of words or sentences having a lexical content and utterances having a determinate pragmatic function—presupposes an account of what one could call the “agentive intentionality”, i.e. the complex intentionality proper to practical goal-directed human behaviours. Some final remarks about outcomes, meaning, scope and perspectives opened by the method applied will conclude the study (section III).http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/4068intentionintentionalitymeaninglanguageactionmind
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laurent Cesalli
Claudio Majolino
spellingShingle Laurent Cesalli
Claudio Majolino
Making Sense. On the Cluster significatio-intentio in Medieval and “Austrian” Philosophies
Methodos
intention
intentionality
meaning
language
action
mind
author_facet Laurent Cesalli
Claudio Majolino
author_sort Laurent Cesalli
title Making Sense. On the Cluster significatio-intentio in Medieval and “Austrian” Philosophies
title_short Making Sense. On the Cluster significatio-intentio in Medieval and “Austrian” Philosophies
title_full Making Sense. On the Cluster significatio-intentio in Medieval and “Austrian” Philosophies
title_fullStr Making Sense. On the Cluster significatio-intentio in Medieval and “Austrian” Philosophies
title_full_unstemmed Making Sense. On the Cluster significatio-intentio in Medieval and “Austrian” Philosophies
title_sort making sense. on the cluster significatio-intentio in medieval and “austrian” philosophies
publisher Université de Lille
series Methodos
issn 1769-7379
publishDate 2014-05-01
description “Austrian” (or “Austro-German”) philosophy of language is characterized, among other things, by the following two features: (1) Problems of language are considered within the broader framework of an intentionality-based philosophy of mind—or, to put it more precisely, questions of meaning are considered as involving a quite articulated theory of intentions; (2) several aspects of such an account are explicitly presented as inspired by or somehow already at work in the Medieval Scholastic tradition. In this study we follow the track indicated by these two features and use some “Austrian” reflections on the articulation between meanings and intentions as a “heuristic filter”, as it were, to shed a new and different light on some Medieval debates in philosophy of language on the relationship between significare and intendere. It will be roughly divided into three parts. We begin by singling out some distinctive tenets of the “Austrian” strategy aimed at describing the relationship between meaning and intentions (section I), and then turn to various Medieval texts from the 13th and 14th century dealing with the two related notions of significatio and intentio (section II). The upshot of our investigation is to show how, for both “Austrian” and Medieval philosophers of language (and beyond their differences), a proper understanding of linguistic meaning—in the twofold sense of words or sentences having a lexical content and utterances having a determinate pragmatic function—presupposes an account of what one could call the “agentive intentionality”, i.e. the complex intentionality proper to practical goal-directed human behaviours. Some final remarks about outcomes, meaning, scope and perspectives opened by the method applied will conclude the study (section III).
topic intention
intentionality
meaning
language
action
mind
url http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/4068
work_keys_str_mv AT laurentcesalli makingsenseontheclustersignificatiointentioinmedievalandaustrianphilosophies
AT claudiomajolino makingsenseontheclustersignificatiointentioinmedievalandaustrianphilosophies
_version_ 1725089790136680448