Honey bee success predicted by landscape composition in Ohio, USA

Foraging honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) can routinely travel as far as several kilometers from their hive in the process of collecting nectar and pollen from floral patches within the surrounding landscape. Since the availability of floral resources at the landscape scale is a function of landscape...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: DB Sponsler, RM Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2015-03-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/838.pdf
id doaj-d8404f76c87f459abdcf73f9383f8eab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d8404f76c87f459abdcf73f9383f8eab2020-11-24T23:02:50ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592015-03-013e83810.7717/peerj.838838Honey bee success predicted by landscape composition in Ohio, USADB Sponsler0RM Johnson1Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, USADepartment of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, USAForaging honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) can routinely travel as far as several kilometers from their hive in the process of collecting nectar and pollen from floral patches within the surrounding landscape. Since the availability of floral resources at the landscape scale is a function of landscape composition, apiculturists have long recognized that landscape composition is a critical determinant of honey bee colony success. Nevertheless, very few studies present quantitative data relating colony success metrics to local landscape composition. We employed a beekeeper survey in conjunction with GIS-based landscape analysis to model colony success as a function of landscape composition in the State of Ohio, USA, a region characterized by intensive cropland, urban development, deciduous forest, and grassland. We found that colony food accumulation and wax production were positively related to cropland and negatively related to forest and grassland, a pattern that may be driven by the abundance of dandelion and clovers in agricultural areas compared to forest or mature grassland. Colony food accumulation was also negatively correlated with urban land cover in sites dominated by urban and agricultural land use, which does not support the popular opinion that the urban environment is more favorable to honey bees than cropland.https://peerj.com/articles/838.pdfApiculturePollinatorCitizen-scienceUrban beekeepingLandscape ecology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author DB Sponsler
RM Johnson
spellingShingle DB Sponsler
RM Johnson
Honey bee success predicted by landscape composition in Ohio, USA
PeerJ
Apiculture
Pollinator
Citizen-science
Urban beekeeping
Landscape ecology
author_facet DB Sponsler
RM Johnson
author_sort DB Sponsler
title Honey bee success predicted by landscape composition in Ohio, USA
title_short Honey bee success predicted by landscape composition in Ohio, USA
title_full Honey bee success predicted by landscape composition in Ohio, USA
title_fullStr Honey bee success predicted by landscape composition in Ohio, USA
title_full_unstemmed Honey bee success predicted by landscape composition in Ohio, USA
title_sort honey bee success predicted by landscape composition in ohio, usa
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2015-03-01
description Foraging honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) can routinely travel as far as several kilometers from their hive in the process of collecting nectar and pollen from floral patches within the surrounding landscape. Since the availability of floral resources at the landscape scale is a function of landscape composition, apiculturists have long recognized that landscape composition is a critical determinant of honey bee colony success. Nevertheless, very few studies present quantitative data relating colony success metrics to local landscape composition. We employed a beekeeper survey in conjunction with GIS-based landscape analysis to model colony success as a function of landscape composition in the State of Ohio, USA, a region characterized by intensive cropland, urban development, deciduous forest, and grassland. We found that colony food accumulation and wax production were positively related to cropland and negatively related to forest and grassland, a pattern that may be driven by the abundance of dandelion and clovers in agricultural areas compared to forest or mature grassland. Colony food accumulation was also negatively correlated with urban land cover in sites dominated by urban and agricultural land use, which does not support the popular opinion that the urban environment is more favorable to honey bees than cropland.
topic Apiculture
Pollinator
Citizen-science
Urban beekeeping
Landscape ecology
url https://peerj.com/articles/838.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dbsponsler honeybeesuccesspredictedbylandscapecompositioninohiousa
AT rmjohnson honeybeesuccesspredictedbylandscapecompositioninohiousa
_version_ 1725634892724699136