Industry-supported meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses with non-profit or no support: Differences in methodological quality and conclusions
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Studies have shown that industry-sponsored meta-analyses of drugs lack scientific rigour and have biased conclusions. However, these studies have been restricted to certain medical specialities. We compared all industry-supported met...
Main Authors: | Faurschou Annesofie, Tendal Britta, Maric Katja L, Jørgensen Anders W, Gøtzsche Peter C |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2008-09-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/8/60 |
Similar Items
-
Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: systematic review with meta-analyses of trial data from clinical study reports
by: Lars Jørgensen, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Clinical effectiveness and safety of montelukast in asthma. What are the conclusions from clinical trials and meta-analyses?
by: Hon KLE, et al.
Published: (2014-06-01) -
Reporting and methodological quality of meta-analyses in urological literature
by: Leilei Xia, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Increasing retractions of meta-analyses publications for methodological flaw
by: Chia-Yun Chen, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01) -
How to interpret meta-analyses: A recipe for interpretation of the methodology used in the meta-analyses conducted on cardiovascular risk factors in Turkey
by: Mustafa Kılıçkap
Published: (2018-10-01)