Efektivitas Penerapan Metode Diskusi dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik (PMR) Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Lampung Timur

The aims of this research are to know: (1) Which one more effective, learning using discussion with realistic mathematics  approach or a conventional learning. (2) Which one gives better mathematics learning achievement, student with personality types Sanguine or Phlegmatis. (3) Which one more effec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Desty Septianawati
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro 2014-12-01
Series:Jurnal Aksioma
Online Access:http://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/matematika/article/view/31
id doaj-d83291f9ae934292b77c02bfaa3ad354
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d83291f9ae934292b77c02bfaa3ad3542020-11-25T03:59:49ZindUniversitas Muhammadiyah MetroJurnal Aksioma2089-87032442-54192014-12-013210.24127/ajpm.v3i2.3125Efektivitas Penerapan Metode Diskusi dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik (PMR) Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Lampung TimurDesty SeptianawatiThe aims of this research are to know: (1) Which one more effective, learning using discussion with realistic mathematics  approach or a conventional learning. (2) Which one gives better mathematics learning achievement, student with personality types Sanguine or Phlegmatis. (3) Which one more effective for each personality typeof students, learning using discussion withPMR or a conventional learning.This research used quasi experimental method with its population included all of students of state junior high school in East Lampung Regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the samples was 202 students. The data collection technique were the document that was the last of examination theseven grade for initial capability data before the experiment, achievement tests for mathematics student achievement data, and questioner of personality types. The data was analyzed using analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows: (1) learning mathematics using discussion with PMR is more effective than learning mathematics usingdiscussion with conventional approach. (2) Students with personalitytypesof Sanguinenor Phlegmatis have the same mathematics achievement. (3) For each personality type of students, learning using discussion with PMR approach is more effective than learning mathematics the method of discussion withconventional approach.http://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/matematika/article/view/31
collection DOAJ
language Indonesian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Desty Septianawati
spellingShingle Desty Septianawati
Efektivitas Penerapan Metode Diskusi dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik (PMR) Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Lampung Timur
Jurnal Aksioma
author_facet Desty Septianawati
author_sort Desty Septianawati
title Efektivitas Penerapan Metode Diskusi dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik (PMR) Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Lampung Timur
title_short Efektivitas Penerapan Metode Diskusi dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik (PMR) Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Lampung Timur
title_full Efektivitas Penerapan Metode Diskusi dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik (PMR) Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Lampung Timur
title_fullStr Efektivitas Penerapan Metode Diskusi dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik (PMR) Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Lampung Timur
title_full_unstemmed Efektivitas Penerapan Metode Diskusi dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik (PMR) Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Lampung Timur
title_sort efektivitas penerapan metode diskusi dengan pendekatan matematika realistik (pmr) ditinjau dari tipe kepribadian siswa kelas viii smp negeri di kabupaten lampung timur
publisher Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro
series Jurnal Aksioma
issn 2089-8703
2442-5419
publishDate 2014-12-01
description The aims of this research are to know: (1) Which one more effective, learning using discussion with realistic mathematics  approach or a conventional learning. (2) Which one gives better mathematics learning achievement, student with personality types Sanguine or Phlegmatis. (3) Which one more effective for each personality typeof students, learning using discussion withPMR or a conventional learning.This research used quasi experimental method with its population included all of students of state junior high school in East Lampung Regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the samples was 202 students. The data collection technique were the document that was the last of examination theseven grade for initial capability data before the experiment, achievement tests for mathematics student achievement data, and questioner of personality types. The data was analyzed using analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows: (1) learning mathematics using discussion with PMR is more effective than learning mathematics usingdiscussion with conventional approach. (2) Students with personalitytypesof Sanguinenor Phlegmatis have the same mathematics achievement. (3) For each personality type of students, learning using discussion with PMR approach is more effective than learning mathematics the method of discussion withconventional approach.
url http://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/matematika/article/view/31
work_keys_str_mv AT destyseptianawati efektivitaspenerapanmetodediskusidenganpendekatanmatematikarealistikpmrditinjaudaritipekepribadiansiswakelasviiismpnegeridikabupatenlampungtimur
_version_ 1724452801838317568