Transitioning to Sustainable Administrative Gatekeeping in Access to Social Grants for South African Adult Persons with Disabilities

This article explores the efficiency in the administration of social grants for adult persons with disabilities (PWDs) in the Northern Cape province of South Africa. The focus, in particular, is on explaining why, despite a gatekeeping element, adult PWDs presenting with the same medical condition,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mangalane du Toit, Liezel Lues
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3597
id doaj-d829d0ff31204c8bbe7b34e6a4d0a809
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d829d0ff31204c8bbe7b34e6a4d0a8092021-03-25T00:02:27ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-03-01133597359710.3390/su13073597Transitioning to Sustainable Administrative Gatekeeping in Access to Social Grants for South African Adult Persons with DisabilitiesMangalane du Toit0Liezel Lues1Department of Public Administration and Management, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South AfricaDepartment of Public Administration and Management, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South AfricaThis article explores the efficiency in the administration of social grants for adult persons with disabilities (PWDs) in the Northern Cape province of South Africa. The focus, in particular, is on explaining why, despite a gatekeeping element, adult PWDs presenting with the same medical condition, with mild or no verifiable impairment, keep returning and are allowed through the system, only to be rejected again, citing the same reasons as before. Administrative gatekeeping, as illustrated in the 2011 Social Grants Disability Management Model, does not extend beyond (i) verifying the correctness of supporting documents and (ii) checking documented proof of medical history to ascertain that applicants of social grants for adult PWDs are not booked for medical assessments within three months of their last assessment. This points to a weakness in the system, as the screening officials cannot turn away applicants of social grants for adult PWDs for any other reason once the documents are verified as correct. Here, we report the findings from responses to structured telephone interviews and structured face-to-face interviews with applicants of social grants for adult PWDs who are residents of the Northern Cape province of South Africa. We conclude that socio-economic circumstances, rather than impairment, are the main drivers for adult PWDs to keep on applying for social grants for adult PWDs and we offer some strategies for addressing this predicament to contribute to a sustainable and an efficient, effective, and economical administration process.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3597sustainableadministrative gatekeepingsocial grants for adult persons with disabilitiesSouth Africa2011 social grants disability management model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mangalane du Toit
Liezel Lues
spellingShingle Mangalane du Toit
Liezel Lues
Transitioning to Sustainable Administrative Gatekeeping in Access to Social Grants for South African Adult Persons with Disabilities
Sustainability
sustainable
administrative gatekeeping
social grants for adult persons with disabilities
South Africa
2011 social grants disability management model
author_facet Mangalane du Toit
Liezel Lues
author_sort Mangalane du Toit
title Transitioning to Sustainable Administrative Gatekeeping in Access to Social Grants for South African Adult Persons with Disabilities
title_short Transitioning to Sustainable Administrative Gatekeeping in Access to Social Grants for South African Adult Persons with Disabilities
title_full Transitioning to Sustainable Administrative Gatekeeping in Access to Social Grants for South African Adult Persons with Disabilities
title_fullStr Transitioning to Sustainable Administrative Gatekeeping in Access to Social Grants for South African Adult Persons with Disabilities
title_full_unstemmed Transitioning to Sustainable Administrative Gatekeeping in Access to Social Grants for South African Adult Persons with Disabilities
title_sort transitioning to sustainable administrative gatekeeping in access to social grants for south african adult persons with disabilities
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-03-01
description This article explores the efficiency in the administration of social grants for adult persons with disabilities (PWDs) in the Northern Cape province of South Africa. The focus, in particular, is on explaining why, despite a gatekeeping element, adult PWDs presenting with the same medical condition, with mild or no verifiable impairment, keep returning and are allowed through the system, only to be rejected again, citing the same reasons as before. Administrative gatekeeping, as illustrated in the 2011 Social Grants Disability Management Model, does not extend beyond (i) verifying the correctness of supporting documents and (ii) checking documented proof of medical history to ascertain that applicants of social grants for adult PWDs are not booked for medical assessments within three months of their last assessment. This points to a weakness in the system, as the screening officials cannot turn away applicants of social grants for adult PWDs for any other reason once the documents are verified as correct. Here, we report the findings from responses to structured telephone interviews and structured face-to-face interviews with applicants of social grants for adult PWDs who are residents of the Northern Cape province of South Africa. We conclude that socio-economic circumstances, rather than impairment, are the main drivers for adult PWDs to keep on applying for social grants for adult PWDs and we offer some strategies for addressing this predicament to contribute to a sustainable and an efficient, effective, and economical administration process.
topic sustainable
administrative gatekeeping
social grants for adult persons with disabilities
South Africa
2011 social grants disability management model
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3597
work_keys_str_mv AT mangalanedutoit transitioningtosustainableadministrativegatekeepinginaccesstosocialgrantsforsouthafricanadultpersonswithdisabilities
AT liezellues transitioningtosustainableadministrativegatekeepinginaccesstosocialgrantsforsouthafricanadultpersonswithdisabilities
_version_ 1724204241045684224