The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Quantitative Studies

The study summarizes the research literature on the effect of testing on student achievement, which comprises several hundred studies conducted from the early 20th century to the present day. Only quantitative studies are listed here (N studies = 177; N effects = 640). Mean effect sizes range from a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richard P. Phelps
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nonpartisan Education Group 2011-01-01
Series:Nonpartisan Education Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Resources/QuantitativeList.htm
id doaj-d813eb36505a4bbb9344eeb5e3a03ce4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d813eb36505a4bbb9344eeb5e3a03ce42021-07-02T06:48:07ZengNonpartisan Education GroupNonpartisan Education Review2150-64772011-01-0172125The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Quantitative StudiesRichard P. PhelpsThe study summarizes the research literature on the effect of testing on student achievement, which comprises several hundred studies conducted from the early 20th century to the present day. Only quantitative studies are listed here (N studies = 177; N effects = 640). Mean effect sizes range from a moderate d ˜ 0.55 to a fairly large d ˜ 0.88 depending on the way effects are aggregated or effect sizes are adjusted for study artifacts. Testing with feedback produces the strongest positive effect on achievement. Adding stakes or testing with greater frequency also strongly and positively affects achievement. The evidence from a century’s worth of quantitative studies shows the effect of testing on achievement to be moderately to strongly positive.Smaller-scale studies, however, tend to produce stronger effects than do large-scale studies. Those who judge the effect of testing on achievement exclusively from large-sample multivariate studies deprive themselves of the most focused, clear, and precise evidence. Some prominent researchers in economics and education, for example, have claimed that no studies of “test-based accountability” had been conducted before theirs in the early 2000s. But, this list includes 24 studies completed before 2000 whose primary focus was to measure the effect of “test-based accountability.” A few dozen more pre-2000 studies also measured the effect of test-based accountability although such was not their primary focus. Include qualitative and program evaluation studies of test-based accountability, and the count of pre-2000 studies rises into the hundreds. http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Resources/QuantitativeList.htmeducationpolicymeta-analysisresearch summarytestingeffect size
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard P. Phelps
spellingShingle Richard P. Phelps
The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Quantitative Studies
Nonpartisan Education Review
education
policy
meta-analysis
research summary
testing
effect size
author_facet Richard P. Phelps
author_sort Richard P. Phelps
title The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Quantitative Studies
title_short The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Quantitative Studies
title_full The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Quantitative Studies
title_fullStr The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Quantitative Studies
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Quantitative Studies
title_sort effect of testing on achievement: meta-analyses and research summary, 1910–2010. source list, effect sizes, and references for quantitative studies
publisher Nonpartisan Education Group
series Nonpartisan Education Review
issn 2150-6477
publishDate 2011-01-01
description The study summarizes the research literature on the effect of testing on student achievement, which comprises several hundred studies conducted from the early 20th century to the present day. Only quantitative studies are listed here (N studies = 177; N effects = 640). Mean effect sizes range from a moderate d ˜ 0.55 to a fairly large d ˜ 0.88 depending on the way effects are aggregated or effect sizes are adjusted for study artifacts. Testing with feedback produces the strongest positive effect on achievement. Adding stakes or testing with greater frequency also strongly and positively affects achievement. The evidence from a century’s worth of quantitative studies shows the effect of testing on achievement to be moderately to strongly positive.Smaller-scale studies, however, tend to produce stronger effects than do large-scale studies. Those who judge the effect of testing on achievement exclusively from large-sample multivariate studies deprive themselves of the most focused, clear, and precise evidence. Some prominent researchers in economics and education, for example, have claimed that no studies of “test-based accountability” had been conducted before theirs in the early 2000s. But, this list includes 24 studies completed before 2000 whose primary focus was to measure the effect of “test-based accountability.” A few dozen more pre-2000 studies also measured the effect of test-based accountability although such was not their primary focus. Include qualitative and program evaluation studies of test-based accountability, and the count of pre-2000 studies rises into the hundreds.
topic education
policy
meta-analysis
research summary
testing
effect size
url http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Resources/QuantitativeList.htm
work_keys_str_mv AT richardpphelps theeffectoftestingonachievementmetaanalysesandresearchsummary19102010sourcelisteffectsizesandreferencesforquantitativestudies
AT richardpphelps effectoftestingonachievementmetaanalysesandresearchsummary19102010sourcelisteffectsizesandreferencesforquantitativestudies
_version_ 1721336856595922944