Filtering across spatial scales: phylogeny, biogeography and community structure in bumble bees.

Despite the expansion of phylogenetic community analysis to understand community assembly, few studies have used these methods on mobile organisms and it has been suggested the local scales that are typically considered may be too small to represent the community as perceived by organisms with high...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandra N Harmon-Threatt, David D Ackerly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3609857?pdf=render
id doaj-d811cbad83aa4bb6a11d244375974fc9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d811cbad83aa4bb6a11d244375974fc92020-11-24T20:40:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0183e6044610.1371/journal.pone.0060446Filtering across spatial scales: phylogeny, biogeography and community structure in bumble bees.Alexandra N Harmon-ThreattDavid D AckerlyDespite the expansion of phylogenetic community analysis to understand community assembly, few studies have used these methods on mobile organisms and it has been suggested the local scales that are typically considered may be too small to represent the community as perceived by organisms with high mobility. Mobility is believed to allow species to mediate competitive interactions quickly and thus highly mobile species may appear randomly assembled in local communities. At larger scales, however, biogeographical processes could cause communities to be either phylogenetically clustered or even. Using phylogenetic community analysis we examined patterns of relatedness and trait similarity in communities of bumble bees (Bombus) across spatial scales comparing: local communities to regional pools, regional communities to continental pools and the continental community to a global species pool. Species composition and data on tongue lengths, a key foraging trait, were used to test patterns of relatedness and trait similarity across scales. Although expected to exhibit limiting similarity, local communities were clustered both phenotypically and phylogenetically. Larger spatial scales were also found to have more phylogenetic clustering but less trait clustering. While patterns of relatedness in mobile species have previously been suggested to exhibit less structure in local communities and to be less clustered than immobile species, we suggest that mobility may actually allow communities to have more similar species that can simply limit direct competition through mobility.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3609857?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexandra N Harmon-Threatt
David D Ackerly
spellingShingle Alexandra N Harmon-Threatt
David D Ackerly
Filtering across spatial scales: phylogeny, biogeography and community structure in bumble bees.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Alexandra N Harmon-Threatt
David D Ackerly
author_sort Alexandra N Harmon-Threatt
title Filtering across spatial scales: phylogeny, biogeography and community structure in bumble bees.
title_short Filtering across spatial scales: phylogeny, biogeography and community structure in bumble bees.
title_full Filtering across spatial scales: phylogeny, biogeography and community structure in bumble bees.
title_fullStr Filtering across spatial scales: phylogeny, biogeography and community structure in bumble bees.
title_full_unstemmed Filtering across spatial scales: phylogeny, biogeography and community structure in bumble bees.
title_sort filtering across spatial scales: phylogeny, biogeography and community structure in bumble bees.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Despite the expansion of phylogenetic community analysis to understand community assembly, few studies have used these methods on mobile organisms and it has been suggested the local scales that are typically considered may be too small to represent the community as perceived by organisms with high mobility. Mobility is believed to allow species to mediate competitive interactions quickly and thus highly mobile species may appear randomly assembled in local communities. At larger scales, however, biogeographical processes could cause communities to be either phylogenetically clustered or even. Using phylogenetic community analysis we examined patterns of relatedness and trait similarity in communities of bumble bees (Bombus) across spatial scales comparing: local communities to regional pools, regional communities to continental pools and the continental community to a global species pool. Species composition and data on tongue lengths, a key foraging trait, were used to test patterns of relatedness and trait similarity across scales. Although expected to exhibit limiting similarity, local communities were clustered both phenotypically and phylogenetically. Larger spatial scales were also found to have more phylogenetic clustering but less trait clustering. While patterns of relatedness in mobile species have previously been suggested to exhibit less structure in local communities and to be less clustered than immobile species, we suggest that mobility may actually allow communities to have more similar species that can simply limit direct competition through mobility.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3609857?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandranharmonthreatt filteringacrossspatialscalesphylogenybiogeographyandcommunitystructureinbumblebees
AT daviddackerly filteringacrossspatialscalesphylogenybiogeographyandcommunitystructureinbumblebees
_version_ 1716827311409463296