Spatial Motion Coordinates that Determine the Perceptual Dominance in Binocular Rivalry

It is known that moving stimuli perceptually dominate over static stimuli during binocular rivalry. Recent evidence shows that visual motions can be processed in spatiotopic, or object-based as well as retinotopic coordinates. Here we examined which spatial coordinate determines the motion dominance...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isamu Motoyoshi, Ryouhei Nakayama, Tsutomu Kusano, Takao Sato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-05-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1068/ic410
id doaj-d7f531fb381a4c758b58e3f192e72f3b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d7f531fb381a4c758b58e3f192e72f3b2020-11-25T03:42:55ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952011-05-01210.1068/ic41010.1068_ic410Spatial Motion Coordinates that Determine the Perceptual Dominance in Binocular RivalryIsamu Motoyoshi0Ryouhei Nakayama1Tsutomu Kusano2Takao Sato3Human and Information Science Lab, NTT CS Labs.Department of Psychology, The University of TokyoDepartment of Psychology, The University of TokyoDepartment of Psychology, The University of TokyoIt is known that moving stimuli perceptually dominate over static stimuli during binocular rivalry. Recent evidence shows that visual motions can be processed in spatiotopic, or object-based as well as retinotopic coordinates. Here we examined which spatial coordinate determines the motion dominance in binocular rivalry. Observers viewed a dichoptic pair of stimuli, each consisting of a fixation marker, a gray square background, and a diagonal grating (45 deg in one eye and 135 deg in the other). The observer judged which grating appeared dominant. Drifting gratings were dominant over static gratings when observers maintained stationary fixation. However, when they tracked the fixation marker that moved together with the drifting grating, the physically drifting but retinotopically stationary grating became dominant. When observers tracked fixation marker and stimulus background both moving together, the gratings that were physically stationary but moving in retinotopic and object-based coordinates were perceptually dominant. Subsequent quantitative analyses revealed that spatiotopic and object-based motions contribute equally with or even more than retinotopic motion. These results demonstrate a significant role of nonretinotopic motion signals in triggering the conscious awareness of visual stimuli.https://doi.org/10.1068/ic410
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Isamu Motoyoshi
Ryouhei Nakayama
Tsutomu Kusano
Takao Sato
spellingShingle Isamu Motoyoshi
Ryouhei Nakayama
Tsutomu Kusano
Takao Sato
Spatial Motion Coordinates that Determine the Perceptual Dominance in Binocular Rivalry
i-Perception
author_facet Isamu Motoyoshi
Ryouhei Nakayama
Tsutomu Kusano
Takao Sato
author_sort Isamu Motoyoshi
title Spatial Motion Coordinates that Determine the Perceptual Dominance in Binocular Rivalry
title_short Spatial Motion Coordinates that Determine the Perceptual Dominance in Binocular Rivalry
title_full Spatial Motion Coordinates that Determine the Perceptual Dominance in Binocular Rivalry
title_fullStr Spatial Motion Coordinates that Determine the Perceptual Dominance in Binocular Rivalry
title_full_unstemmed Spatial Motion Coordinates that Determine the Perceptual Dominance in Binocular Rivalry
title_sort spatial motion coordinates that determine the perceptual dominance in binocular rivalry
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2011-05-01
description It is known that moving stimuli perceptually dominate over static stimuli during binocular rivalry. Recent evidence shows that visual motions can be processed in spatiotopic, or object-based as well as retinotopic coordinates. Here we examined which spatial coordinate determines the motion dominance in binocular rivalry. Observers viewed a dichoptic pair of stimuli, each consisting of a fixation marker, a gray square background, and a diagonal grating (45 deg in one eye and 135 deg in the other). The observer judged which grating appeared dominant. Drifting gratings were dominant over static gratings when observers maintained stationary fixation. However, when they tracked the fixation marker that moved together with the drifting grating, the physically drifting but retinotopically stationary grating became dominant. When observers tracked fixation marker and stimulus background both moving together, the gratings that were physically stationary but moving in retinotopic and object-based coordinates were perceptually dominant. Subsequent quantitative analyses revealed that spatiotopic and object-based motions contribute equally with or even more than retinotopic motion. These results demonstrate a significant role of nonretinotopic motion signals in triggering the conscious awareness of visual stimuli.
url https://doi.org/10.1068/ic410
work_keys_str_mv AT isamumotoyoshi spatialmotioncoordinatesthatdeterminetheperceptualdominanceinbinocularrivalry
AT ryouheinakayama spatialmotioncoordinatesthatdeterminetheperceptualdominanceinbinocularrivalry
AT tsutomukusano spatialmotioncoordinatesthatdeterminetheperceptualdominanceinbinocularrivalry
AT takaosato spatialmotioncoordinatesthatdeterminetheperceptualdominanceinbinocularrivalry
_version_ 1724522534525730816