Neuro-interventions in review for cardiologists

In acute stroke, rapid administration of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) to stroke patients is the mainstay of treatment. Intravenous r-tPA improves functional outcomes when given within 4.5 h of ischemic stroke onset. Patients eligible for intravenous r-tPA should...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deepti Vibha, Sunil Kumar Verma, M V Padma, Atul Mathur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.j-pcs.org/article.asp?issn=2395-5414;year=2016;volume=2;issue=1;spage=13;epage=16;aulast=Vibha
id doaj-d7c09a9c69c7468481220cfff8a18a08
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d7c09a9c69c7468481220cfff8a18a082020-11-24T21:00:38ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences2395-54142454-28302016-01-0121131610.4103/2395-5414.182991Neuro-interventions in review for cardiologistsDeepti VibhaSunil Kumar VermaM V PadmaAtul MathurIn acute stroke, rapid administration of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) to stroke patients is the mainstay of treatment. Intravenous r-tPA improves functional outcomes when given within 4.5 h of ischemic stroke onset. Patients eligible for intravenous r-tPA should receive intravenous r-tPA even if endovascular treatments are being considered. Patients should receive endovascular therapy with a stent retriever if they meet appropriate criteria as per the American Heart Association guidelines. With the publication of results of the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial (CREST), there is evidence of no difference in the rate of late ipsilateral stroke after endarterectomy or stenting at 4 and 10 years. CREST provides the physician more options for the treatment of carotid stenosis and has shown that both carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting are effective and safe when performed by experienced operators, and when patients are chosen appropriately.http://www.j-pcs.org/article.asp?issn=2395-5414;year=2016;volume=2;issue=1;spage=13;epage=16;aulast=VibhaCarotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trialcarotid stenosisguidelines 2016reviewstroke
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Deepti Vibha
Sunil Kumar Verma
M V Padma
Atul Mathur
spellingShingle Deepti Vibha
Sunil Kumar Verma
M V Padma
Atul Mathur
Neuro-interventions in review for cardiologists
Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences
Carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial
carotid stenosis
guidelines 2016
review
stroke
author_facet Deepti Vibha
Sunil Kumar Verma
M V Padma
Atul Mathur
author_sort Deepti Vibha
title Neuro-interventions in review for cardiologists
title_short Neuro-interventions in review for cardiologists
title_full Neuro-interventions in review for cardiologists
title_fullStr Neuro-interventions in review for cardiologists
title_full_unstemmed Neuro-interventions in review for cardiologists
title_sort neuro-interventions in review for cardiologists
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences
issn 2395-5414
2454-2830
publishDate 2016-01-01
description In acute stroke, rapid administration of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) to stroke patients is the mainstay of treatment. Intravenous r-tPA improves functional outcomes when given within 4.5 h of ischemic stroke onset. Patients eligible for intravenous r-tPA should receive intravenous r-tPA even if endovascular treatments are being considered. Patients should receive endovascular therapy with a stent retriever if they meet appropriate criteria as per the American Heart Association guidelines. With the publication of results of the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial (CREST), there is evidence of no difference in the rate of late ipsilateral stroke after endarterectomy or stenting at 4 and 10 years. CREST provides the physician more options for the treatment of carotid stenosis and has shown that both carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting are effective and safe when performed by experienced operators, and when patients are chosen appropriately.
topic Carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial
carotid stenosis
guidelines 2016
review
stroke
url http://www.j-pcs.org/article.asp?issn=2395-5414;year=2016;volume=2;issue=1;spage=13;epage=16;aulast=Vibha
work_keys_str_mv AT deeptivibha neurointerventionsinreviewforcardiologists
AT sunilkumarverma neurointerventionsinreviewforcardiologists
AT mvpadma neurointerventionsinreviewforcardiologists
AT atulmathur neurointerventionsinreviewforcardiologists
_version_ 1716779102582603776