A comparative evaluation of skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes with skeletal anchored and conventional facemask protraction therapy
Objective: To cephalometrically evaluate and compare the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue changes after maxillary protraction with skeletally anchored and conventional facemask. Methods: The data for the study were collected from the pre- and post-treatment records of patients of maxillary...
Main Authors: | Tulika Tripathi, Priyank Rai, Navneet Singh, Shilpa Kalra |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Orthodontic Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jorthodsci.org/article.asp?issn=2278-0203;year=2016;volume=5;issue=3;spage=92;epage=99;aulast=Tripathi |
Similar Items
-
Early Class III treatment with Hybrid-Hyrax -Facemask in comparison to Hybrid-Hyrax-Mentoplate – skeletal and dental outcomes
by: Jan H. Willmann, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Correction of skeletal Class III in a growing male patient by reverse pull facemask
by: P Kapoor, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01) -
Maxillary protraction with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask versus skeletal anchorage with mini-implants in class III patients: a non-randomized clinical trial
by: Ricardo Alves de Souza, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
A finite element analysis of the effects of different skeletal protraction and expansion methods used in class III malocclusion treatment
by: Serhat Ozdemir, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Effect of protraction facemask on the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review
by: Xinqi Huang, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)